COVID-19时代的就业不确定性:来自NIDS-CRAM和QLFS的证据

IF 1.3 4区 经济学 Q3 DEVELOPMENT STUDIES
Reza Che Daniels, Kim Ingle, Tim S. L. Brophy
{"title":"COVID-19时代的就业不确定性:来自NIDS-CRAM和QLFS的证据","authors":"Reza Che Daniels, Kim Ingle, Tim S. L. Brophy","doi":"10.1080/0376835X.2022.2089635","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This paper conducts an analysis of employment uncertainty in South Africa during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic, using NIDS-CRAM and five waves of Statistics SA's Quarterly Labour Force Survey (QLFS: 2020-Q1 to 2021-Q1). We find that much of the differences in estimates of labour force states including employment, unemployment and not economically active, are due to different initial conditions and different reference periods between the two surveys, as well as the way that uncertain job attachment is measured in the questionnaires. This leads to higher estimates of employment in NIDS-CRAM compared to the QLFS for both a pre-pandemic baseline and over the entire period investigated (February 2020 to March 2021). This implies the two data sources are not strictly comparable, but rather complementary when analysing different aspects of the labour force. We discuss the implications for labour market research based on these data sources.","PeriodicalId":51523,"journal":{"name":"Development Southern Africa","volume":"39 1","pages":"623 - 643"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Employment uncertainty in the era of COVID-19: Evidence from NIDS-CRAM and the QLFS\",\"authors\":\"Reza Che Daniels, Kim Ingle, Tim S. L. Brophy\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/0376835X.2022.2089635\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT This paper conducts an analysis of employment uncertainty in South Africa during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic, using NIDS-CRAM and five waves of Statistics SA's Quarterly Labour Force Survey (QLFS: 2020-Q1 to 2021-Q1). We find that much of the differences in estimates of labour force states including employment, unemployment and not economically active, are due to different initial conditions and different reference periods between the two surveys, as well as the way that uncertain job attachment is measured in the questionnaires. This leads to higher estimates of employment in NIDS-CRAM compared to the QLFS for both a pre-pandemic baseline and over the entire period investigated (February 2020 to March 2021). This implies the two data sources are not strictly comparable, but rather complementary when analysing different aspects of the labour force. We discuss the implications for labour market research based on these data sources.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51523,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Development Southern Africa\",\"volume\":\"39 1\",\"pages\":\"623 - 643\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Development Southern Africa\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/0376835X.2022.2089635\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Development Southern Africa","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0376835X.2022.2089635","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

摘要本文利用NIDS-CRAM和南非统计局的五波季度劳动力调查(QLFS:2020-Q1至2021-Q1),对新冠肺炎大流行第一年南非的就业不确定性进行了分析。我们发现,对劳动力状况(包括就业、失业和不从事经济活动)的估计存在很大差异,这是由于两项调查之间的初始条件和参考期不同,以及问卷中衡量不确定工作依恋的方式不同。这导致在疫情前的基线和整个调查期间(2020年2月至2021年3月),与QLFS相比,NIDS-CRAM的就业估计值更高。这意味着,在分析劳动力的不同方面时,这两个数据来源并非严格可比,而是互补的。我们讨论了基于这些数据来源对劳动力市场研究的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Employment uncertainty in the era of COVID-19: Evidence from NIDS-CRAM and the QLFS
ABSTRACT This paper conducts an analysis of employment uncertainty in South Africa during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic, using NIDS-CRAM and five waves of Statistics SA's Quarterly Labour Force Survey (QLFS: 2020-Q1 to 2021-Q1). We find that much of the differences in estimates of labour force states including employment, unemployment and not economically active, are due to different initial conditions and different reference periods between the two surveys, as well as the way that uncertain job attachment is measured in the questionnaires. This leads to higher estimates of employment in NIDS-CRAM compared to the QLFS for both a pre-pandemic baseline and over the entire period investigated (February 2020 to March 2021). This implies the two data sources are not strictly comparable, but rather complementary when analysing different aspects of the labour force. We discuss the implications for labour market research based on these data sources.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Development Southern Africa
Development Southern Africa DEVELOPMENT STUDIES-
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
7.10%
发文量
42
期刊介绍: The Development Southern Africa editorial team are pleased to announce that the journal has been accepted into the Thomson Reuters (formerly ISI) Social Science Citation Index. The journal will receive its first Impact Factor in 2010. Development Southern Africa offers a platform for expressing views and encouraging debate among development specialists, policy decision makers, scholars and students in the wider professional fraternity and especially in southern Africa. The journal publishes articles that reflect innovative thinking on key development challenges and policy issues facing South Africa and other countries in the southern African region.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信