人类世与capitalloceno之间的生态archism:代谢中断、化石资本和生态制度

IF 0.8 Q3 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS
Á. Villegas
{"title":"人类世与capitalloceno之间的生态archism:代谢中断、化石资本和生态制度","authors":"Á. Villegas","doi":"10.7440/colombiaint108.2021.02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":". Objective/Context : The article focuses on the discussions on the Anthropocene and Capitalocene in eco-marxism, especially in the Metabolic Rift and World-Ecology schools. These entered into a conceptual confrontation on how this new state of the Earth System should be named, its characteristics, agents, 16 genesis and relationship with capitalism. Methodology : A critical reading of the recent bibliography on the concepts of Anthropocene and Capitalocene is made, especially that produced by eco-marxism. Conclusions : The main differences between the aforementioned schools are related to the beginning of the Anthropocene and the Capitalocene, which for the first would refer to the beginning of capitalism, while for the second it would refer to the Industrial Revolution, or the Great Acceleration; the relevance of the nature-society dichotomy has also been debated. It is also possible to identify several fundamental agreements on the central role of capital accumulation, the responsibility of capitalists in the process of global change, and the systemic character of the contemporary crisis of capitalism. Originality : The article makes a systematic review of one of the most important discussions of eco-marxism, a field of great relevance within Marxist theory at present. Although a few analogous reflections have been published, these are biased due to their ascription to one of the two competing schools.","PeriodicalId":35154,"journal":{"name":"Colombia Internacional","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"El ecomarxismo entre el Antropoceno y el Capitaloceno: rupturas metabólicas, capital fósil y régimen ecológico\",\"authors\":\"Á. Villegas\",\"doi\":\"10.7440/colombiaint108.2021.02\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\". Objective/Context : The article focuses on the discussions on the Anthropocene and Capitalocene in eco-marxism, especially in the Metabolic Rift and World-Ecology schools. These entered into a conceptual confrontation on how this new state of the Earth System should be named, its characteristics, agents, 16 genesis and relationship with capitalism. Methodology : A critical reading of the recent bibliography on the concepts of Anthropocene and Capitalocene is made, especially that produced by eco-marxism. Conclusions : The main differences between the aforementioned schools are related to the beginning of the Anthropocene and the Capitalocene, which for the first would refer to the beginning of capitalism, while for the second it would refer to the Industrial Revolution, or the Great Acceleration; the relevance of the nature-society dichotomy has also been debated. It is also possible to identify several fundamental agreements on the central role of capital accumulation, the responsibility of capitalists in the process of global change, and the systemic character of the contemporary crisis of capitalism. Originality : The article makes a systematic review of one of the most important discussions of eco-marxism, a field of great relevance within Marxist theory at present. Although a few analogous reflections have been published, these are biased due to their ascription to one of the two competing schools.\",\"PeriodicalId\":35154,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Colombia Internacional\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Colombia Internacional\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7440/colombiaint108.2021.02\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Colombia Internacional","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7440/colombiaint108.2021.02","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

。目的/背景:本文着重讨论生态马克思主义中的人类世和首都世,特别是代谢裂谷学派和世界生态学学派。这就地球系统的这种新状态应该如何命名、其特征、代理人、起源以及与资本主义的关系展开了概念上的对抗。方法论:对人类世和资本主义概念的最新参考文献,特别是生态马克思主义的参考文献进行了批判性解读。结论:上述学派之间的主要差异与人类世和资本主义的开始有关,前者指资本主义的开始,后者指工业革命或大加速;自然-社会二分法的相关性也一直存在争议。关于资本积累的核心作用、资本家在全球变化过程中的责任以及当代资本主义危机的系统性特征,也可以确定几个基本协议。原创性:本文系统地回顾了生态马克思主义最重要的讨论之一,这是当前马克思主义理论中一个非常重要的领域。尽管已经发表了一些类似的反思,但由于它们属于两个相互竞争的学校之一,这些反思是有偏见的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
El ecomarxismo entre el Antropoceno y el Capitaloceno: rupturas metabólicas, capital fósil y régimen ecológico
. Objective/Context : The article focuses on the discussions on the Anthropocene and Capitalocene in eco-marxism, especially in the Metabolic Rift and World-Ecology schools. These entered into a conceptual confrontation on how this new state of the Earth System should be named, its characteristics, agents, 16 genesis and relationship with capitalism. Methodology : A critical reading of the recent bibliography on the concepts of Anthropocene and Capitalocene is made, especially that produced by eco-marxism. Conclusions : The main differences between the aforementioned schools are related to the beginning of the Anthropocene and the Capitalocene, which for the first would refer to the beginning of capitalism, while for the second it would refer to the Industrial Revolution, or the Great Acceleration; the relevance of the nature-society dichotomy has also been debated. It is also possible to identify several fundamental agreements on the central role of capital accumulation, the responsibility of capitalists in the process of global change, and the systemic character of the contemporary crisis of capitalism. Originality : The article makes a systematic review of one of the most important discussions of eco-marxism, a field of great relevance within Marxist theory at present. Although a few analogous reflections have been published, these are biased due to their ascription to one of the two competing schools.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Colombia Internacional
Colombia Internacional Arts and Humanities-History
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
28
审稿时长
52 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信