Propertius 1.3中的认识论不公正

IF 0.2 3区历史学 N/A CLASSICS

ARETHUSA Pub Date : 2022-03-01 DOI:10.1353/are.2022.0006

Nick Ollivère

{"title":"Propertius 1.3中的认识论不公正","authors":"Nick Ollivère","doi":"10.1353/are.2022.0006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:In Propertius 1.3 we hear Cynthia speak for the first time, in direct speech, accusing Propertius of infidelity. It is a striking moment in elegy, barely to be repeated. In this paper I want to explore what the framework of epistemic injustice, part of the field of epistemology, could mean for a reading of this dramatic encounter. As elaborated by the philosopher Miranda Fricker, the theory provides radical new insights into how we conceive of the relationship between knowers, how we acquire and share our knowledge, and the prejudices and assumptions behind these interactions.","PeriodicalId":44750,"journal":{"name":"ARETHUSA","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Epistemic Injustice in Propertius 1.3\",\"authors\":\"Nick Ollivère\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/are.2022.0006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract:In Propertius 1.3 we hear Cynthia speak for the first time, in direct speech, accusing Propertius of infidelity. It is a striking moment in elegy, barely to be repeated. In this paper I want to explore what the framework of epistemic injustice, part of the field of epistemology, could mean for a reading of this dramatic encounter. As elaborated by the philosopher Miranda Fricker, the theory provides radical new insights into how we conceive of the relationship between knowers, how we acquire and share our knowledge, and the prejudices and assumptions behind these interactions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44750,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ARETHUSA\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ARETHUSA\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/are.2022.0006\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"N/A\",\"JCRName\":\"CLASSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ARETHUSA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/are.2022.0006","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"N/A","JCRName":"CLASSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:在《Propertius》1.3中，我们第一次听到辛西娅用直接引语指责Propertius不忠。这是一首悲歌中令人震惊的时刻，几乎无法重复。在本文中，我想探讨认识论不公正的框架，认识论领域的一部分，对于阅读这一戏剧性的遭遇可能意味着什么。正如哲学家米兰达·弗里克(Miranda Fricker)所阐述的那样，该理论为我们如何理解知者之间的关系、我们如何获取和分享知识以及这些互动背后的偏见和假设提供了全新的见解。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Epistemic Injustice in Propertius 1.3

Abstract:In Propertius 1.3 we hear Cynthia speak for the first time, in direct speech, accusing Propertius of infidelity. It is a striking moment in elegy, barely to be repeated. In this paper I want to explore what the framework of epistemic injustice, part of the field of epistemology, could mean for a reading of this dramatic encounter. As elaborated by the philosopher Miranda Fricker, the theory provides radical new insights into how we conceive of the relationship between knowers, how we acquire and share our knowledge, and the prejudices and assumptions behind these interactions.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

ARETHUSA CLASSICS-

CiteScore

0.30

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Arethusa is known for publishing original literary and cultural studies of the ancient world and of the field of classics that combine contemporary theoretical perspectives with more traditional approaches to literary and material evidence. Interdisciplinary in nature, this distinguished journal often features special thematic issues.