联合疗法治疗癌症的基本原理:独立作用、反应相关性、附带敏感性与协同作用

IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
E. Schmidt, Linda Z Sun, A. Palmer, Cong Chen
{"title":"联合疗法治疗癌症的基本原理:独立作用、反应相关性、附带敏感性与协同作用","authors":"E. Schmidt, Linda Z Sun, A. Palmer, Cong Chen","doi":"10.1146/annurev-cancerbio-061421-020411","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The principle of independent drug action proposes that responses to drug combinations result from responses to one or the other of two combining agents, but not both. Explorations of biological pathway interactions in signal transduction and immunobiology as synergy have not been connected to mathematical demonstrations of above–independent action activity, which would define pharmacologic synergy. We review independent action as the explanation for cancer drug combinations and find no evidence for pharmacologic synergy. Rather, a measure of correlation of response ( ρ) when positive can explain below–independent action results, and negative correlation can explain above–independent action results. Anticorrelated responses may be a mathematical demonstration of collateral sensitivity, which can achieve above–independent action activity. Inappropriate use of biological concepts of synergy may be contributing to high failure rates for immuno-oncology clinical trials, indicating a need for more rigorous applications of independent action to the development of cancer drug combination therapy. Expected final online publication date for the Annual Review of Cancer Biology, Volume 7 is April 2023. Please see http://www.annualreviews.org/page/journal/pubdates for revised estimates.","PeriodicalId":54233,"journal":{"name":"Annual Review of Cancer Biology-Series","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Rationales for Combining Therapies to Treat Cancer: Independent Action, Response Correlation, and Collateral Sensitivity Versus Synergy\",\"authors\":\"E. Schmidt, Linda Z Sun, A. Palmer, Cong Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.1146/annurev-cancerbio-061421-020411\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The principle of independent drug action proposes that responses to drug combinations result from responses to one or the other of two combining agents, but not both. Explorations of biological pathway interactions in signal transduction and immunobiology as synergy have not been connected to mathematical demonstrations of above–independent action activity, which would define pharmacologic synergy. We review independent action as the explanation for cancer drug combinations and find no evidence for pharmacologic synergy. Rather, a measure of correlation of response ( ρ) when positive can explain below–independent action results, and negative correlation can explain above–independent action results. Anticorrelated responses may be a mathematical demonstration of collateral sensitivity, which can achieve above–independent action activity. Inappropriate use of biological concepts of synergy may be contributing to high failure rates for immuno-oncology clinical trials, indicating a need for more rigorous applications of independent action to the development of cancer drug combination therapy. Expected final online publication date for the Annual Review of Cancer Biology, Volume 7 is April 2023. Please see http://www.annualreviews.org/page/journal/pubdates for revised estimates.\",\"PeriodicalId\":54233,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annual Review of Cancer Biology-Series\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annual Review of Cancer Biology-Series\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-cancerbio-061421-020411\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annual Review of Cancer Biology-Series","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-cancerbio-061421-020411","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

独立药物作用原理提出,对药物组合的反应是由对两种联合制剂中的一种或另一种的反应产生的,但不是两者都有。将信号转导和免疫生物学中的生物途径相互作用作为协同作用的探索尚未与上述独立作用活性的数学证明联系起来,后者将定义药理学协同作用。我们回顾了独立作用作为癌症药物组合的解释,没有发现药物协同作用的证据。相反,当反应的相关性(ρ)为正时,它可以解释以下独立的行动结果,而负相关性可以解释以上独立的行动后果。反相关反应可能是侧支敏感性的数学证明,它可以实现以上独立的动作活动。不恰当地使用协同作用的生物学概念可能会导致免疫生态学临床试验的高失败率,这表明需要更严格地将独立作用应用于癌症药物联合治疗的开发。《癌症生物学年度评论》第7卷预计最终在线出版日期为2023年4月。请参阅http://www.annualreviews.org/page/journal/pubdates用于修订估算。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Rationales for Combining Therapies to Treat Cancer: Independent Action, Response Correlation, and Collateral Sensitivity Versus Synergy
The principle of independent drug action proposes that responses to drug combinations result from responses to one or the other of two combining agents, but not both. Explorations of biological pathway interactions in signal transduction and immunobiology as synergy have not been connected to mathematical demonstrations of above–independent action activity, which would define pharmacologic synergy. We review independent action as the explanation for cancer drug combinations and find no evidence for pharmacologic synergy. Rather, a measure of correlation of response ( ρ) when positive can explain below–independent action results, and negative correlation can explain above–independent action results. Anticorrelated responses may be a mathematical demonstration of collateral sensitivity, which can achieve above–independent action activity. Inappropriate use of biological concepts of synergy may be contributing to high failure rates for immuno-oncology clinical trials, indicating a need for more rigorous applications of independent action to the development of cancer drug combination therapy. Expected final online publication date for the Annual Review of Cancer Biology, Volume 7 is April 2023. Please see http://www.annualreviews.org/page/journal/pubdates for revised estimates.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
14.50
自引率
1.30%
发文量
13
期刊介绍: The Annual Review of Cancer Biology offers comprehensive reviews on various topics within cancer research, covering pivotal and emerging areas in the field. As our understanding of cancer's fundamental mechanisms deepens and more findings transition into targeted clinical treatments, the journal is structured around three main themes: Cancer Cell Biology, Tumorigenesis and Cancer Progression, and Translational Cancer Science. The current volume of this journal has transitioned from gated to open access through Annual Reviews' Subscribe to Open program, ensuring all articles are published under a CC BY license.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信