公共利益在共享和kluseconomie1

Q4 Social Sciences

Mens en Maatschappij Pub Date : 2018-08-01 DOI:10.5117/MEM2018.3.002.FREN

K. Frenken, A. V. Waes, M. Smink, R. Est

{"title":"公共利益在共享和kluseconomie1","authors":"K. Frenken, A. V. Waes, M. Smink, R. Est","doi":"10.5117/MEM2018.3.002.FREN","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Public interests in the sharing and gig economyThe success of Airbnb and Uber has given rise to a public debate about the pros and cons of online sharing and gig platforms. This article reports on five case studies of platforms operating in car\n sharing (SnappCar), home sharing (Airbnb), home restaurants (Airdnd), ride hailing (UberPop) and cleaning (Helpling). The article then puts the sharing and gig economy into a historical perspective to highlight that the platforms build on pre-existing social practices. and presents a policy\n framework based on four basic policy options: enforce existing regulations, enact new regulations, deregulate, or tolerate.","PeriodicalId":35265,"journal":{"name":"Mens en Maatschappij","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.5117/MEM2018.3.002.FREN","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Publieke belangen in de deel- en kluseconomie1\",\"authors\":\"K. Frenken, A. V. Waes, M. Smink, R. Est\",\"doi\":\"10.5117/MEM2018.3.002.FREN\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Public interests in the sharing and gig economyThe success of Airbnb and Uber has given rise to a public debate about the pros and cons of online sharing and gig platforms. This article reports on five case studies of platforms operating in car\\n sharing (SnappCar), home sharing (Airbnb), home restaurants (Airdnd), ride hailing (UberPop) and cleaning (Helpling). The article then puts the sharing and gig economy into a historical perspective to highlight that the platforms build on pre-existing social practices. and presents a policy\\n framework based on four basic policy options: enforce existing regulations, enact new regulations, deregulate, or tolerate.\",\"PeriodicalId\":35265,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Mens en Maatschappij\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.5117/MEM2018.3.002.FREN\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Mens en Maatschappij\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5117/MEM2018.3.002.FREN\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mens en Maatschappij","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5117/MEM2018.3.002.FREN","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要共享和零工经济中的公共利益Airbnb和优步的成功引发了一场关于在线共享和零用工平台利弊的公开辩论。本文报告了五个在汽车共享（SnappCar）、家庭共享（Airbnb）、家庭餐厅（Airdnd）、叫车（UberPop）和清洁（Helpling）中运营的平台的案例研究。然后，文章将共享和零工经济放在一个历史的视角中，强调这些平台建立在预先存在的社会实践之上。并提出了一个基于四个基本政策选项的政策框架：执行现有法规、制定新法规、放松管制或容忍。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Publieke belangen in de deel- en kluseconomie1

Abstract Public interests in the sharing and gig economyThe success of Airbnb and Uber has given rise to a public debate about the pros and cons of online sharing and gig platforms. This article reports on five case studies of platforms operating in car sharing (SnappCar), home sharing (Airbnb), home restaurants (Airdnd), ride hailing (UberPop) and cleaning (Helpling). The article then puts the sharing and gig economy into a historical perspective to highlight that the platforms build on pre-existing social practices. and presents a policy framework based on four basic policy options: enforce existing regulations, enact new regulations, deregulate, or tolerate.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Mens en Maatschappij Social Sciences-Social Sciences (all)

CiteScore

0.20

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Mens en Maatschappij is een Nederlandstalig tijdschrift voor sociale wetenschappen. Het biedt het beste en breedste begrip van de actuele ontwikkelingen binnen de sociale wetenschappen en sociologie. De redactie selecteert artikelen op wetenschappelijke kwaliteit en actualiteit. Alle artikelen worden onderworpen aan een peer-reviewproces. Het tijdschrift is geen spreekbuis van een bepaalde richting of stroming, maar staat open voor elke bijdrage op wetenschappelijk niveau. Naast de reguliere nummers verschijnt ieder jaar een themanummer.