肉类替代品:进化,结构技术,趋势和挑战

IF 5.3 2区 农林科学 Q1 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Muhammed Shijas Vallikkadan, Logesh Dhanapal, Sayantani Dutta, S. K. Sivakamasundari, J. A. Moses, C. Anandharamakrishnan
{"title":"肉类替代品:进化,结构技术,趋势和挑战","authors":"Muhammed Shijas Vallikkadan,&nbsp;Logesh Dhanapal,&nbsp;Sayantani Dutta,&nbsp;S. K. Sivakamasundari,&nbsp;J. A. Moses,&nbsp;C. Anandharamakrishnan","doi":"10.1007/s12393-023-09332-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The global meat substitute industry is estimated to be worth $8.1 billion by 2026. Prevailing health consciousness among consumers and their concern for the future environment has lifted the concept of meat alternatives from niche to the mainstream. Numerous research findings have emphasized the importance of meat alternatives or substitutes formulated from plant protein, animal cells, and insect-based sources, which emulate the nutritional composition and sensorial properties of animal meat. The current review discusses the necessity of meat substitutes, and their evolution, and bestows an outline of the ongoing research in this field. Novel protein sources such as vegetal proteins (cereal, pulses, oil seeds) and non-vegetal proteins (fungal, air protein, insect, myofibril) are reported to offer a viable alternative to animal meat. However, the functionalities of these proteins and the structuring technique influence the textural properties of the end products. Thus, the selection of a suitable technique is an important aspect in the formulation of the meat alternative. A thorough discussion of various structuring techniques for synthesizing matrixes and fibers with similar textural attributes to that of animal meat has been presented. Furthermore, limitations that confine consumers’ acceptance, the feasibility of scale-up, and the prerequisite for the regulatory framework for meat alternatives have also been pointed out. Overall, the ingredients and techniques of formulation of meat alternatives discussed in detail in this review can provide insight to the researchers and industries in formulating novel meat alternatives.\n</p></div>","PeriodicalId":565,"journal":{"name":"Food Engineering Reviews","volume":"15 2","pages":"329 - 359"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s12393-023-09332-8.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Meat Alternatives: Evolution, Structuring Techniques, Trends, and Challenges\",\"authors\":\"Muhammed Shijas Vallikkadan,&nbsp;Logesh Dhanapal,&nbsp;Sayantani Dutta,&nbsp;S. K. Sivakamasundari,&nbsp;J. A. Moses,&nbsp;C. Anandharamakrishnan\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12393-023-09332-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The global meat substitute industry is estimated to be worth $8.1 billion by 2026. Prevailing health consciousness among consumers and their concern for the future environment has lifted the concept of meat alternatives from niche to the mainstream. Numerous research findings have emphasized the importance of meat alternatives or substitutes formulated from plant protein, animal cells, and insect-based sources, which emulate the nutritional composition and sensorial properties of animal meat. The current review discusses the necessity of meat substitutes, and their evolution, and bestows an outline of the ongoing research in this field. Novel protein sources such as vegetal proteins (cereal, pulses, oil seeds) and non-vegetal proteins (fungal, air protein, insect, myofibril) are reported to offer a viable alternative to animal meat. However, the functionalities of these proteins and the structuring technique influence the textural properties of the end products. Thus, the selection of a suitable technique is an important aspect in the formulation of the meat alternative. A thorough discussion of various structuring techniques for synthesizing matrixes and fibers with similar textural attributes to that of animal meat has been presented. Furthermore, limitations that confine consumers’ acceptance, the feasibility of scale-up, and the prerequisite for the regulatory framework for meat alternatives have also been pointed out. Overall, the ingredients and techniques of formulation of meat alternatives discussed in detail in this review can provide insight to the researchers and industries in formulating novel meat alternatives.\\n</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":565,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Food Engineering Reviews\",\"volume\":\"15 2\",\"pages\":\"329 - 359\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s12393-023-09332-8.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Food Engineering Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12393-023-09332-8\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food Engineering Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12393-023-09332-8","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

据估计,到2026年,全球肉类替代品产业的价值将达到81亿美元。消费者普遍的健康意识和他们对未来环境的关注已经将肉类替代品的概念从利基提升到主流。许多研究结果都强调了肉类替代品或由植物蛋白、动物细胞和昆虫来源配制的替代品的重要性,这些替代品模仿动物肉类的营养成分和感官特性。本综述讨论了肉类替代品的必要性及其演变,并概述了该领域正在进行的研究。据报道,植物蛋白(谷物、豆类、油籽)和非植物蛋白(真菌、空气蛋白、昆虫、肌原纤维)等新型蛋白质来源为动物肉类提供了可行的替代品。然而,这些蛋白质的功能和结构技术会影响最终产物的结构特性。因此,选择合适的技术是肉类替代品配方中的一个重要方面。对各种结构技术进行了深入的讨论,以合成具有类似动物肉的纹理属性的基质和纤维。此外,还指出了限制消费者接受的限制,扩大规模的可行性以及肉类替代品监管框架的先决条件。总之,本文详细讨论了肉类替代品的成分和配方技术,可以为研究人员和行业制定新的肉类替代品提供见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Meat Alternatives: Evolution, Structuring Techniques, Trends, and Challenges

Meat Alternatives: Evolution, Structuring Techniques, Trends, and Challenges

The global meat substitute industry is estimated to be worth $8.1 billion by 2026. Prevailing health consciousness among consumers and their concern for the future environment has lifted the concept of meat alternatives from niche to the mainstream. Numerous research findings have emphasized the importance of meat alternatives or substitutes formulated from plant protein, animal cells, and insect-based sources, which emulate the nutritional composition and sensorial properties of animal meat. The current review discusses the necessity of meat substitutes, and their evolution, and bestows an outline of the ongoing research in this field. Novel protein sources such as vegetal proteins (cereal, pulses, oil seeds) and non-vegetal proteins (fungal, air protein, insect, myofibril) are reported to offer a viable alternative to animal meat. However, the functionalities of these proteins and the structuring technique influence the textural properties of the end products. Thus, the selection of a suitable technique is an important aspect in the formulation of the meat alternative. A thorough discussion of various structuring techniques for synthesizing matrixes and fibers with similar textural attributes to that of animal meat has been presented. Furthermore, limitations that confine consumers’ acceptance, the feasibility of scale-up, and the prerequisite for the regulatory framework for meat alternatives have also been pointed out. Overall, the ingredients and techniques of formulation of meat alternatives discussed in detail in this review can provide insight to the researchers and industries in formulating novel meat alternatives.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Food Engineering Reviews
Food Engineering Reviews FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY-
CiteScore
14.20
自引率
1.50%
发文量
27
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Food Engineering Reviews publishes articles encompassing all engineering aspects of today’s scientific food research. The journal focuses on both classic and modern food engineering topics, exploring essential factors such as the health, nutritional, and environmental aspects of food processing. Trends that will drive the discipline over time, from the lab to industrial implementation, are identified and discussed. The scope of topics addressed is broad, including transport phenomena in food processing; food process engineering; physical properties of foods; food nano-science and nano-engineering; food equipment design; food plant design; modeling food processes; microbial inactivation kinetics; preservation technologies; engineering aspects of food packaging; shelf-life, storage and distribution of foods; instrumentation, control and automation in food processing; food engineering, health and nutrition; energy and economic considerations in food engineering; sustainability; and food engineering education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信