引入争论:政党作为制度的批判视角

Q3 Social Sciences
J. Hejny, Adam Hilton
{"title":"引入争论:政党作为制度的批判视角","authors":"J. Hejny, Adam Hilton","doi":"10.1080/07078552.2021.1949785","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Scholars working in the analytic traditions of Historical Institutionalism (HI) and American Political Development (APD) have increasingly turned their attention to the role of political parties in shaping politics across time and space. However, despite recent advances, historically-minded social scientists continue to juxtapose institutions and contentious forms of politics. We argue that such a dichotomy is unwarranted. Specifically, we assert that because of their place and function in the modern democratic polity, political parties are fundamentally and inextricably contentious institutions.","PeriodicalId":39831,"journal":{"name":"Studies in Political Economy","volume":"102 1","pages":"161 - 181"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bringing contention in: a critical perspective on political parties as institutions\",\"authors\":\"J. Hejny, Adam Hilton\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/07078552.2021.1949785\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Scholars working in the analytic traditions of Historical Institutionalism (HI) and American Political Development (APD) have increasingly turned their attention to the role of political parties in shaping politics across time and space. However, despite recent advances, historically-minded social scientists continue to juxtapose institutions and contentious forms of politics. We argue that such a dichotomy is unwarranted. Specifically, we assert that because of their place and function in the modern democratic polity, political parties are fundamentally and inextricably contentious institutions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":39831,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Studies in Political Economy\",\"volume\":\"102 1\",\"pages\":\"161 - 181\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-05-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Studies in Political Economy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/07078552.2021.1949785\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in Political Economy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/07078552.2021.1949785","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要致力于历史制度主义(HI)和美国政治发展(APD)分析传统的学者越来越多地将注意力转向政党在跨越时间和空间塑造政治中的作用。然而,尽管最近取得了进展,但具有历史意识的社会科学家继续将制度和有争议的政治形式并置。我们认为这种二分法是没有根据的。具体而言,我们断言,由于政党在现代民主政体中的地位和作用,政党从根本上来说是有争议的机构。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Bringing contention in: a critical perspective on political parties as institutions
Abstract Scholars working in the analytic traditions of Historical Institutionalism (HI) and American Political Development (APD) have increasingly turned their attention to the role of political parties in shaping politics across time and space. However, despite recent advances, historically-minded social scientists continue to juxtapose institutions and contentious forms of politics. We argue that such a dichotomy is unwarranted. Specifically, we assert that because of their place and function in the modern democratic polity, political parties are fundamentally and inextricably contentious institutions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Studies in Political Economy
Studies in Political Economy Social Sciences-Political Science and International Relations
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
期刊介绍: Studies in Political Economy is an interdisciplinary journal committed to the publication of original work in the various traditions of socialist political economy. Researchers and analysts within these traditions seek to understand how political, economic and cultural processes and struggles interact to shape and reshape the conditions of people"s lives.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信