区域电网负荷驱动下能源效率与需求响应的相互作用

IF 13 Q1 ENERGY & FUELS
Brian F. Gerke , Cong Zhang , Samanvitha Murthy , Andrew J. Satchwell , Elaina Present , Henry Horsey , Eric Wilson , Andrew Parker , Andrew Speake , Rajendra Adhikari , Mary Ann Piette
{"title":"区域电网负荷驱动下能源效率与需求响应的相互作用","authors":"Brian F. Gerke ,&nbsp;Cong Zhang ,&nbsp;Samanvitha Murthy ,&nbsp;Andrew J. Satchwell ,&nbsp;Elaina Present ,&nbsp;Henry Horsey ,&nbsp;Eric Wilson ,&nbsp;Andrew Parker ,&nbsp;Andrew Speake ,&nbsp;Rajendra Adhikari ,&nbsp;Mary Ann Piette","doi":"10.1016/j.adapen.2022.100092","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Energy efficiency (EE) has long been recognized as a source of value to the electricity grid. Especially with increasing penetration of variable renewable generation, demand response (DR) can also provide system value and support the evolving needs of the grid. Yet there has been little study to date of interactions between EE and DR that may complicate their grid impacts. In this study we perform bottom-up modelling of the interactive effects between EE and DR in buildings for three representative regions of the United States electricity grid. Leveraging new simulation tools that enable detailed modelling of the building stock, we synthesize system-level demand profiles for several scenarios representing different portfolios of EE measures. In each scenario, we couple the underlying building models with a database of DR-enabling technologies to estimate building-level DR capabilities and compute a system-level supply curve for DR. We assess the resulting EE and DR interactive effects based on an existing conceptual framework. The results show a complex relationship between EE and DR, with interactive effects whose size and direction can vary widely depending on the grid system, type of DR, and the framework level being considered. Most often, the overall effect is competition between EE and DR, but significant complementarity can also occur, especially when the EE portfolio includes controls measures. Our results suggest that EE and DR programs developed without considering interactive effects may erode the benefits of both resources, whereas a more integrated approach may yield increased benefits.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":34615,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Applied Energy","volume":"6 ","pages":"Article 100092"},"PeriodicalIF":13.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666792422000105/pdfft?md5=7d55e039169bc7072e502d6a845249f9&pid=1-s2.0-S2666792422000105-main.pdf","citationCount":"13","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Load-driven interactions between energy efficiency and demand response on regional grid scales\",\"authors\":\"Brian F. Gerke ,&nbsp;Cong Zhang ,&nbsp;Samanvitha Murthy ,&nbsp;Andrew J. Satchwell ,&nbsp;Elaina Present ,&nbsp;Henry Horsey ,&nbsp;Eric Wilson ,&nbsp;Andrew Parker ,&nbsp;Andrew Speake ,&nbsp;Rajendra Adhikari ,&nbsp;Mary Ann Piette\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.adapen.2022.100092\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Energy efficiency (EE) has long been recognized as a source of value to the electricity grid. Especially with increasing penetration of variable renewable generation, demand response (DR) can also provide system value and support the evolving needs of the grid. Yet there has been little study to date of interactions between EE and DR that may complicate their grid impacts. In this study we perform bottom-up modelling of the interactive effects between EE and DR in buildings for three representative regions of the United States electricity grid. Leveraging new simulation tools that enable detailed modelling of the building stock, we synthesize system-level demand profiles for several scenarios representing different portfolios of EE measures. In each scenario, we couple the underlying building models with a database of DR-enabling technologies to estimate building-level DR capabilities and compute a system-level supply curve for DR. We assess the resulting EE and DR interactive effects based on an existing conceptual framework. The results show a complex relationship between EE and DR, with interactive effects whose size and direction can vary widely depending on the grid system, type of DR, and the framework level being considered. Most often, the overall effect is competition between EE and DR, but significant complementarity can also occur, especially when the EE portfolio includes controls measures. Our results suggest that EE and DR programs developed without considering interactive effects may erode the benefits of both resources, whereas a more integrated approach may yield increased benefits.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":34615,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in Applied Energy\",\"volume\":\"6 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100092\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":13.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666792422000105/pdfft?md5=7d55e039169bc7072e502d6a845249f9&pid=1-s2.0-S2666792422000105-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"13\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in Applied Energy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666792422000105\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Applied Energy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666792422000105","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

摘要

能源效率(EE)长期以来一直被认为是电网的价值来源。特别是随着可变可再生能源发电的日益普及,需求响应(DR)也可以提供系统价值并支持电网不断变化的需求。然而,到目前为止,很少有研究表明情感表达和DR之间的相互作用可能会使它们对电网的影响复杂化。在这项研究中,我们对美国电网的三个代表性地区的建筑物中EE和DR之间的相互作用进行了自下而上的建模。利用能够对建筑存量进行详细建模的新仿真工具,我们综合了代表不同能效措施组合的几个场景的系统级需求概况。在每个场景中,我们将底层建筑模型与容灾支持技术数据库相结合,以估计建筑级容灾能力,并计算容灾的系统级供应曲线。我们基于现有的概念框架评估由此产生的EE和DR交互效果。结果表明,EE和DR之间存在复杂的关系,其交互效应的大小和方向可能因网格系统、DR类型和所考虑的框架级别而有很大差异。大多数情况下,总体效果是EE和DR之间的竞争,但也可能出现显著的互补性,特别是当EE组合包括控制措施时。我们的研究结果表明,在没有考虑相互作用的情况下制定的情感表达和DR计划可能会削弱这两种资源的效益,而更综合的方法可能会产生更高的效益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Load-driven interactions between energy efficiency and demand response on regional grid scales

Load-driven interactions between energy efficiency and demand response on regional grid scales

Energy efficiency (EE) has long been recognized as a source of value to the electricity grid. Especially with increasing penetration of variable renewable generation, demand response (DR) can also provide system value and support the evolving needs of the grid. Yet there has been little study to date of interactions between EE and DR that may complicate their grid impacts. In this study we perform bottom-up modelling of the interactive effects between EE and DR in buildings for three representative regions of the United States electricity grid. Leveraging new simulation tools that enable detailed modelling of the building stock, we synthesize system-level demand profiles for several scenarios representing different portfolios of EE measures. In each scenario, we couple the underlying building models with a database of DR-enabling technologies to estimate building-level DR capabilities and compute a system-level supply curve for DR. We assess the resulting EE and DR interactive effects based on an existing conceptual framework. The results show a complex relationship between EE and DR, with interactive effects whose size and direction can vary widely depending on the grid system, type of DR, and the framework level being considered. Most often, the overall effect is competition between EE and DR, but significant complementarity can also occur, especially when the EE portfolio includes controls measures. Our results suggest that EE and DR programs developed without considering interactive effects may erode the benefits of both resources, whereas a more integrated approach may yield increased benefits.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Advances in Applied Energy
Advances in Applied Energy Energy-General Energy
CiteScore
23.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
36
审稿时长
21 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信