某医院集团区域医学影像中心资源共享模式的自我认同整体绩效效应研究

J. He, Fang Du, H. Chiu
{"title":"某医院集团区域医学影像中心资源共享模式的自我认同整体绩效效应研究","authors":"J. He, Fang Du, H. Chiu","doi":"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1000-6672.2019.09.016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective \nTo learn the evaluation of the regional medical imaging resources sharing center by medical staff of a regional hospital group in Shenzhen city. \n \n \nMethods \nThe group established a regional medical imaging resources sharing center in January 2016. One year later, a cross-sectional study was made on its medical staff using questionnaires. Such statistical methods as descriptive statistics and analytic hierarchy process among others were used to learn the self-identified overall effects for such a shared model. \n \n \nResults \nThe questionnaire was responded by 24 medical imaging clinicians, 23 medical imaging technicians and 152 clinical doctors respectively. The comprehensive evaluation weight coefficient of the medical staff to the shared model was 0.692 2, whereas that to the distributed(conventional)model was 0.307 8. With regard to the shared model, 84.3%(43/51)of the clinical doctors held the imaging transmission as faster. 55.3%(84/152), 54.2%(13/24) and 53.6%(12/23) of the clinical doctors, imaging clinicians and technicians held the imaging quality as better than before. Respectively 95.8%(23/24)and 91.3%(21/23)of the imaging clinicians and technicians held their ability to read images or competence as improved. 54.2%(13/24)and 52.2%(12/23)of the imaging clinicians and technicians respectively held the cost performance of income as decreased. \n \n \nConclusions \nCompared with the conventional management model, the medical staff tend to embrace the shared management model, but they complained greater stress, and less satisfaction. \n \n \nKey words: \nMedical image; Shared model; Self-identical overall effects; Questionnaires","PeriodicalId":56974,"journal":{"name":"中华医院管理杂志","volume":"35 1","pages":"778-781"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Study on the self-identified overall performance effect of the resources sharing model at a regional medical imaging center under a hospital group\",\"authors\":\"J. He, Fang Du, H. Chiu\",\"doi\":\"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1000-6672.2019.09.016\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective \\nTo learn the evaluation of the regional medical imaging resources sharing center by medical staff of a regional hospital group in Shenzhen city. \\n \\n \\nMethods \\nThe group established a regional medical imaging resources sharing center in January 2016. One year later, a cross-sectional study was made on its medical staff using questionnaires. Such statistical methods as descriptive statistics and analytic hierarchy process among others were used to learn the self-identified overall effects for such a shared model. \\n \\n \\nResults \\nThe questionnaire was responded by 24 medical imaging clinicians, 23 medical imaging technicians and 152 clinical doctors respectively. The comprehensive evaluation weight coefficient of the medical staff to the shared model was 0.692 2, whereas that to the distributed(conventional)model was 0.307 8. With regard to the shared model, 84.3%(43/51)of the clinical doctors held the imaging transmission as faster. 55.3%(84/152), 54.2%(13/24) and 53.6%(12/23) of the clinical doctors, imaging clinicians and technicians held the imaging quality as better than before. Respectively 95.8%(23/24)and 91.3%(21/23)of the imaging clinicians and technicians held their ability to read images or competence as improved. 54.2%(13/24)and 52.2%(12/23)of the imaging clinicians and technicians respectively held the cost performance of income as decreased. \\n \\n \\nConclusions \\nCompared with the conventional management model, the medical staff tend to embrace the shared management model, but they complained greater stress, and less satisfaction. \\n \\n \\nKey words: \\nMedical image; Shared model; Self-identical overall effects; Questionnaires\",\"PeriodicalId\":56974,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"中华医院管理杂志\",\"volume\":\"35 1\",\"pages\":\"778-781\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-09-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"中华医院管理杂志\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1000-6672.2019.09.016\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中华医院管理杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1000-6672.2019.09.016","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的了解深圳市某区域医院集团医务人员对区域医学影像资源共享中心的评价。方法集团于2016年1月建立区域医学影像资源共享中心。一年后,使用问卷对其医务人员进行了一项横断面研究。描述性统计和层次分析法等统计方法被用来学习这种共享模型的自我识别的总体效果。结果24名医学影像临床医生、23名医学影像技术人员和152名临床医生对问卷进行了回复。医务人员对共享模型的综合评价权重系数为0.692 2,对分布式(常规)模型的综合评判权重系数为0.307 8。关于共享模型,84.3%(43/51)的临床医生认为图像传输更快。55.3%(84/152)、54.2%(13/24)和53.6%(12/23)的临床医生、影像临床医生和技术人员认为影像质量比以前好。95.8%(23/24)和91.3%(21/23)的影像临床医生和技术人员认为他们的图像读取能力或能力有所提高。54.2%(13/24)和52.2%(12/23)的影像临床医生和技术人员认为收入性价比下降。结论与传统的管理模式相比,医务人员倾向于采用共享管理模式,但他们抱怨压力更大,满意度更低。关键词:医学影像;共享模式;自我相同的整体效果;调查表
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Study on the self-identified overall performance effect of the resources sharing model at a regional medical imaging center under a hospital group
Objective To learn the evaluation of the regional medical imaging resources sharing center by medical staff of a regional hospital group in Shenzhen city. Methods The group established a regional medical imaging resources sharing center in January 2016. One year later, a cross-sectional study was made on its medical staff using questionnaires. Such statistical methods as descriptive statistics and analytic hierarchy process among others were used to learn the self-identified overall effects for such a shared model. Results The questionnaire was responded by 24 medical imaging clinicians, 23 medical imaging technicians and 152 clinical doctors respectively. The comprehensive evaluation weight coefficient of the medical staff to the shared model was 0.692 2, whereas that to the distributed(conventional)model was 0.307 8. With regard to the shared model, 84.3%(43/51)of the clinical doctors held the imaging transmission as faster. 55.3%(84/152), 54.2%(13/24) and 53.6%(12/23) of the clinical doctors, imaging clinicians and technicians held the imaging quality as better than before. Respectively 95.8%(23/24)and 91.3%(21/23)of the imaging clinicians and technicians held their ability to read images or competence as improved. 54.2%(13/24)and 52.2%(12/23)of the imaging clinicians and technicians respectively held the cost performance of income as decreased. Conclusions Compared with the conventional management model, the medical staff tend to embrace the shared management model, but they complained greater stress, and less satisfaction. Key words: Medical image; Shared model; Self-identical overall effects; Questionnaires
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9658
期刊介绍:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信