非洲的自然资源、燃料出口和腐败政策

IF 0.4 Q4 SOCIOLOGY

Corvinus Journal of Sociology and Social Policy Pub Date : 2020-08-25 DOI:10.14267/cjssp.2020.1.6

Vincent Aghaegbunam Onodugo, D. Isijola

{"title":"非洲的自然资源、燃料出口和腐败政策","authors":"Vincent Aghaegbunam Onodugo, D. Isijola","doi":"10.14267/cjssp.2020.1.6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Theoretical explanations of corruption in Africa are inconclusive. Economic downturn and poverty are the effects of poor resource management in Africa. Yet, neopatrimonialism also stands as an alternative explanation. This survey separate these two theoretical alternatives of corruption in Africa. It examines 54 African countries using the corruption perception index of 2017. It found that fuel-exporting countries in Africa are more corrupt than non-fuel exporting countries with a large associated effect size (Cohen’s d =. 94). Fuel exporting countries were linked with resource-curse theory (poor resource management) and the extractive theory of corruption (neopatrimonialism) while non fuel exporting countries was linked up with only the extractive theory of corruption (neopatrimonialism). By implication, African nations involved in the exportation of fuel resource are 94% likely to be more corrupt than countries that do not export fuel.","PeriodicalId":42178,"journal":{"name":"Corvinus Journal of Sociology and Social Policy","volume":"11 1","pages":"103-125"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Natural resources, fuel exports and corruption policy in Africa\",\"authors\":\"Vincent Aghaegbunam Onodugo, D. Isijola\",\"doi\":\"10.14267/cjssp.2020.1.6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Theoretical explanations of corruption in Africa are inconclusive. Economic downturn and poverty are the effects of poor resource management in Africa. Yet, neopatrimonialism also stands as an alternative explanation. This survey separate these two theoretical alternatives of corruption in Africa. It examines 54 African countries using the corruption perception index of 2017. It found that fuel-exporting countries in Africa are more corrupt than non-fuel exporting countries with a large associated effect size (Cohen’s d =. 94). Fuel exporting countries were linked with resource-curse theory (poor resource management) and the extractive theory of corruption (neopatrimonialism) while non fuel exporting countries was linked up with only the extractive theory of corruption (neopatrimonialism). By implication, African nations involved in the exportation of fuel resource are 94% likely to be more corrupt than countries that do not export fuel.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42178,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Corvinus Journal of Sociology and Social Policy\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"103-125\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-08-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Corvinus Journal of Sociology and Social Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14267/cjssp.2020.1.6\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Corvinus Journal of Sociology and Social Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14267/cjssp.2020.1.6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

对非洲腐败现象的理论解释尚无定论。经济衰退和贫困是非洲资源管理不善的后果。然而，新世袭主义也可以作为另一种解释。这项调查将非洲腐败的这两种理论选择分开。它使用2017年的腐败感知指数对54个非洲国家进行了调查。研究发现，非洲的燃料出口国比非燃料出口国腐败程度更高，相关效应值较大(Cohen’s d =)。94)。燃料出口国与资源诅咒理论(资源管理不善)和贪腐榨取理论(新世俗制)联系在一起，而非燃料出口国只与贪腐榨取理论(新世俗制)联系在一起。由此可见，从事燃料资源出口的非洲国家比不从事燃料出口的国家腐败的可能性高94%。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Natural resources, fuel exports and corruption policy in Africa

Theoretical explanations of corruption in Africa are inconclusive. Economic downturn and poverty are the effects of poor resource management in Africa. Yet, neopatrimonialism also stands as an alternative explanation. This survey separate these two theoretical alternatives of corruption in Africa. It examines 54 African countries using the corruption perception index of 2017. It found that fuel-exporting countries in Africa are more corrupt than non-fuel exporting countries with a large associated effect size (Cohen’s d =. 94). Fuel exporting countries were linked with resource-curse theory (poor resource management) and the extractive theory of corruption (neopatrimonialism) while non fuel exporting countries was linked up with only the extractive theory of corruption (neopatrimonialism). By implication, African nations involved in the exportation of fuel resource are 94% likely to be more corrupt than countries that do not export fuel.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Corvinus Journal of Sociology and Social Policy SOCIOLOGY-

CiteScore

0.50

自引率

0.00%

发文量

审稿时长

24 weeks

期刊介绍： CJSSP is an edited and peer-reviewed journal, published in yearly volumes of two issues. It publishes original academic articles, research notes, and reviews from sociology, social policy and related fields in English. It invites contributions from the international community of social researchers. The journal covers a widerange of relevant social issues. It is open to new questions, unusual perspectives, explorations and explanations of social and economic behavior, local society, or supranational challenges. Strong preference is given to problem-oriented, theoretically grounded empirical researches, comparative findings, logical arguments and careful methodological solutions. CJSSP aims to respect publication ethics, thus has adopted current best practices to counter plagiarism. The submitted articles are analyzed during the review process, and papers subject to plagiarism are rejected. Also the authors are to comply with the referencing guidelines outlined in the relevant section. The journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge. With similar objectives we do not charge authors for the publication of their articles. Articles submission and processing is free of charge as well. Users can use and build upon the material published in the journal for non-commercial purposes.