制作KIN:原始度，孔隙度和机构

IF 0.7 Q3 ANTHROPOLOGY

Museum Anthropology Pub Date : 2022-02-21 DOI:10.1111/muan.12246

Joshua A. Bell

{"title":"制作KIN:原始度，孔隙度和机构","authors":"Joshua A. Bell","doi":"10.1111/muan.12246","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>This afterword to the special issue “Materiality, Belonging, and the Activation of Difference” begins and ends with Kim TallBear's notion of kin-making as a frame for understanding the relations between objects, peoples, places, heritage regimes, and museums that allows us to keep different ontological perspectives in view. More specifically, “making kin” allows us to unsettle still-dominant settler-colonial violence with an idiom of mutual obligation.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":43404,"journal":{"name":"Museum Anthropology","volume":"45 1","pages":"72-79"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"MAKING KIN: Rawness, Porosity, and the Agencies\",\"authors\":\"Joshua A. Bell\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/muan.12246\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <p>This afterword to the special issue “Materiality, Belonging, and the Activation of Difference” begins and ends with Kim TallBear's notion of kin-making as a frame for understanding the relations between objects, peoples, places, heritage regimes, and museums that allows us to keep different ontological perspectives in view. More specifically, “making kin” allows us to unsettle still-dominant settler-colonial violence with an idiom of mutual obligation.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":43404,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Museum Anthropology\",\"volume\":\"45 1\",\"pages\":\"72-79\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-02-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Museum Anthropology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/muan.12246\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ANTHROPOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Museum Anthropology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/muan.12246","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 2

摘要

这是特刊“物质性、归属感和差异的激活”的后记，以Kim TallBear的亲属关系概念作为理解物体、民族、地点、遗产制度和博物馆之间关系的框架开始和结束，使我们能够保持不同的本体论观点。更具体地说，“建立亲属关系”使我们能够用一种相互义务的成语来动摇仍然占主导地位的定居者-殖民地暴力。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

MAKING KIN: Rawness, Porosity, and the Agencies

This afterword to the special issue “Materiality, Belonging, and the Activation of Difference” begins and ends with Kim TallBear's notion of kin-making as a frame for understanding the relations between objects, peoples, places, heritage regimes, and museums that allows us to keep different ontological perspectives in view. More specifically, “making kin” allows us to unsettle still-dominant settler-colonial violence with an idiom of mutual obligation.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Museum Anthropology ANTHROPOLOGY-

CiteScore

0.80

自引率

75.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Museum Anthropology seeks to be a leading voice for scholarly research on the collection, interpretation, and representation of the material world. Through critical articles, provocative commentaries, and thoughtful reviews, this peer-reviewed journal aspires to cultivate vibrant dialogues that reflect the global and transdisciplinary work of museums. Situated at the intersection of practice and theory, Museum Anthropology advances our knowledge of the ways in which material objects are intertwined with living histories of cultural display, economics, socio-politics, law, memory, ethics, colonialism, conservation, and public education.