速度陷阱和罚单配额的终结:重新设计和改革交通摄像头以增加支持

IF 2.8 3区经济学 Q2 REGIONAL & URBAN PLANNING

Journal of Planning Education and Research Pub Date : 2022-11-22 DOI:10.1177/0739456x221138073

Kelcie M. Ralph, Jesus M. Barajas, Angela Johnson-Rodriguez, A. Delbosc, Carlyn Muir

{"title":"速度陷阱和罚单配额的终结:重新设计和改革交通摄像头以增加支持","authors":"Kelcie M. Ralph, Jesus M. Barajas, Angela Johnson-Rodriguez, A. Delbosc, Carlyn Muir","doi":"10.1177/0739456x221138073","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The U.S. public is skeptical of speed cameras because they are seen as revenue generators. Many cities do indeed raise funds via traffic tickets, although they are primarily issued by police officers, not cameras. Ironically, cameras are poor long-term sources of revenue and therefore can directly address revenue concerns. Our survey of the U.S. public shows concerns about revenue are associated with greater opposition to cameras and greater distrust of the government. We find that re-framing cameras as a tool to prevent revenue-oriented ticketing increases public support. Finally, we recommend several institutional changes to help gain and maintain support.","PeriodicalId":16793,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Planning Education and Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The End of Speed Traps and Ticket Quotas: Re-framing and Reforming Traffic Cameras to Increase Support\",\"authors\":\"Kelcie M. Ralph, Jesus M. Barajas, Angela Johnson-Rodriguez, A. Delbosc, Carlyn Muir\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/0739456x221138073\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The U.S. public is skeptical of speed cameras because they are seen as revenue generators. Many cities do indeed raise funds via traffic tickets, although they are primarily issued by police officers, not cameras. Ironically, cameras are poor long-term sources of revenue and therefore can directly address revenue concerns. Our survey of the U.S. public shows concerns about revenue are associated with greater opposition to cameras and greater distrust of the government. We find that re-framing cameras as a tool to prevent revenue-oriented ticketing increases public support. Finally, we recommend several institutional changes to help gain and maintain support.\",\"PeriodicalId\":16793,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Planning Education and Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Planning Education and Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456x221138073\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"REGIONAL & URBAN PLANNING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Planning Education and Research","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456x221138073","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"REGIONAL & URBAN PLANNING","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 2

摘要

美国公众对测速相机持怀疑态度，因为它们被视为收入来源。许多城市确实通过交通罚单筹集资金，尽管罚单主要由警察发放，而不是摄像头。具有讽刺意味的是，相机是糟糕的长期收入来源，因此可以直接解决收入问题。我们对美国公众的调查显示，对收入的担忧与对相机的更大反对和对政府的更大不信任有关。我们发现，将摄像机重新取景作为防止以收入为导向的票务的工具，会增加公众的支持。最后，我们建议进行一些体制改革，以帮助获得和保持支持。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

The End of Speed Traps and Ticket Quotas: Re-framing and Reforming Traffic Cameras to Increase Support

The U.S. public is skeptical of speed cameras because they are seen as revenue generators. Many cities do indeed raise funds via traffic tickets, although they are primarily issued by police officers, not cameras. Ironically, cameras are poor long-term sources of revenue and therefore can directly address revenue concerns. Our survey of the U.S. public shows concerns about revenue are associated with greater opposition to cameras and greater distrust of the government. We find that re-framing cameras as a tool to prevent revenue-oriented ticketing increases public support. Finally, we recommend several institutional changes to help gain and maintain support.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Journal of Planning Education and Research Multiple-

CiteScore

7.40

自引率

4.50%

发文量

期刊介绍： The Journal of Planning Education and Research (JPER) is a forum for planning educators and scholars (from both academia and practice) to present results from teaching and research that advance the profession and improve planning practice. JPER is the official journal of the Association of Collegiate Schools of Planning (ACSP) and the journal of record for North American planning scholarship. Aimed at scholars and educators in urban and regional planning, political science, policy analysis, urban geography, economics, and sociology, JPER presents the most vital contemporary trends and issues in planning theory, practice, and pedagogy.