《牛津音乐理论批判概念手册》书评,由亚历山大·雷丁和史蒂文·Rings编辑(牛津大学出版社,2019年)

IF 0.4 2区 艺术学 0 MUSIC
Antares Boyle, Rebecca Leydon, P. Sherrill, Jeffrey Swinkin
{"title":"《牛津音乐理论批判概念手册》书评,由亚历山大·雷丁和史蒂文·Rings编辑(牛津大学出版社,2019年)","authors":"Antares Boyle, Rebecca Leydon, P. Sherrill, Jeffrey Swinkin","doi":"10.30535/MTO.27.1.9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"[1.1] In their introduction to The Oxford Handbook of Critical Concepts in Music Theory, editors Alexander Rehding and Steven Rings explain that the word “critical” signals two guiding principles for the collection. First, the selected terms are foundational—“theorists cannot do without them.” Second, despite their fundamental nature, the authors approach them “not as se led knowledge but as sites for critical scrutiny” (xv). The authors in the first section, “Starting Points,” take up this cause with gusto, invoking historical narratives, mathematical equations, and emergent perceptual phenomena to illustrate the complexities of seemingly simple concepts. In this sense, the essays are delightfully varied, bold, and rich. They are also uniformly well wri en (several authors have an enviable talent for wordplay) and beautifully typeset.(1) Below, I a empt to do some justice to each of the seven essays, although space will only allow a full summary of a few, before concluding with some general thoughts on the section.","PeriodicalId":44918,"journal":{"name":"Music Theory Online","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Review of The Oxford Handbook of Critical Concepts in Music Theory, edited by Alexander Rehding and Steven Rings (Oxford University Press, 2019)\",\"authors\":\"Antares Boyle, Rebecca Leydon, P. Sherrill, Jeffrey Swinkin\",\"doi\":\"10.30535/MTO.27.1.9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"[1.1] In their introduction to The Oxford Handbook of Critical Concepts in Music Theory, editors Alexander Rehding and Steven Rings explain that the word “critical” signals two guiding principles for the collection. First, the selected terms are foundational—“theorists cannot do without them.” Second, despite their fundamental nature, the authors approach them “not as se led knowledge but as sites for critical scrutiny” (xv). The authors in the first section, “Starting Points,” take up this cause with gusto, invoking historical narratives, mathematical equations, and emergent perceptual phenomena to illustrate the complexities of seemingly simple concepts. In this sense, the essays are delightfully varied, bold, and rich. They are also uniformly well wri en (several authors have an enviable talent for wordplay) and beautifully typeset.(1) Below, I a empt to do some justice to each of the seven essays, although space will only allow a full summary of a few, before concluding with some general thoughts on the section.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44918,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Music Theory Online\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Music Theory Online\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.30535/MTO.27.1.9\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"艺术学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"MUSIC\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Music Theory Online","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30535/MTO.27.1.9","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"MUSIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

[1.1]编辑Alexander Rehding和Steven Rings在《牛津音乐理论批判概念手册》的引言中解释说,“批判”一词标志着该系列的两个指导原则。首先,所选术语是基础性的——“理论家离不开它们。”其次,尽管它们具有基本性质,但作者将它们“不是以自身为导向的知识,而是作为批判性审查的场所”(xv)。在第一节“起点”中,作者们兴致勃勃地探讨了这一事业,援引历史叙事、数学方程和涌现的感知现象来说明看似简单的概念的复杂性。从这个意义上说,散文是令人愉快的变化,大胆和丰富。它们同样都写得很好(几位作家在文字游戏方面有着令人羡慕的天赋),字体也很漂亮。(1) 下面,我将对七篇文章中的每一篇都做一些公正的处理,尽管篇幅只允许对其中几篇进行完整的总结,然后对本节进行一些总体思考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Review of The Oxford Handbook of Critical Concepts in Music Theory, edited by Alexander Rehding and Steven Rings (Oxford University Press, 2019)
[1.1] In their introduction to The Oxford Handbook of Critical Concepts in Music Theory, editors Alexander Rehding and Steven Rings explain that the word “critical” signals two guiding principles for the collection. First, the selected terms are foundational—“theorists cannot do without them.” Second, despite their fundamental nature, the authors approach them “not as se led knowledge but as sites for critical scrutiny” (xv). The authors in the first section, “Starting Points,” take up this cause with gusto, invoking historical narratives, mathematical equations, and emergent perceptual phenomena to illustrate the complexities of seemingly simple concepts. In this sense, the essays are delightfully varied, bold, and rich. They are also uniformly well wri en (several authors have an enviable talent for wordplay) and beautifully typeset.(1) Below, I a empt to do some justice to each of the seven essays, although space will only allow a full summary of a few, before concluding with some general thoughts on the section.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
25.00%
发文量
26
审稿时长
42 weeks
期刊介绍: Music Theory Online is a journal of criticism, commentary, research and scholarship in music theory, music analysis, and related disciplines. The refereed open-access electronic journal of the Society for Music Theory, MTO has been in continuous publication since 1993. New issues are published four times per year and include articles, reviews, commentaries, and analytical essays. In addition, MTO publishes a list of job opportunities and abstracts of recently completed dissertations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信