情感与亲社会行为:决策模式与个体加工风格的作用

IF 16.4 1区化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY

Accounts of Chemical Research Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.1017/s1930297500008998

Manja Gärtner, D. Andersson, D. Västfjäll, G. Tinghög

{"title":"情感与亲社会行为:决策模式与个体加工风格的作用","authors":"Manja Gärtner, D. Andersson, D. Västfjäll, G. Tinghög","doi":"10.1017/s1930297500008998","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n We study the effects of experimental manipulation of decision mode\n (rational “brain” vs. affective “heart”) and individual difference in\n processing styles (intuition vs. deliberation) on prosocial behavior. In a\n survey experiment with a diverse sample of the Swedish population\n (n = 1,828), we elicited the individuals’\n processing style and we experimentally manipulated reliance on affect or\n reason, regardless of subjects’ preferred mode. Prosocial behavior was\n measured across a series of commonly used and incentivized games (prisoner’s\n dilemma game, public goods game, trust game, dictator game). Our results\n show that prosocial behavior increased for the affective (“heart”) decision\n mode. Further, individual differences in processing style did not predict\n prosocial behavior and did not interact with the experimental\n manipulation.","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Affect and prosocial behavior: The role of decision mode and individual\\n processing style\",\"authors\":\"Manja Gärtner, D. Andersson, D. Västfjäll, G. Tinghög\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/s1930297500008998\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n We study the effects of experimental manipulation of decision mode\\n (rational “brain” vs. affective “heart”) and individual difference in\\n processing styles (intuition vs. deliberation) on prosocial behavior. In a\\n survey experiment with a diverse sample of the Swedish population\\n (n = 1,828), we elicited the individuals’\\n processing style and we experimentally manipulated reliance on affect or\\n reason, regardless of subjects’ preferred mode. Prosocial behavior was\\n measured across a series of commonly used and incentivized games (prisoner’s\\n dilemma game, public goods game, trust game, dictator game). Our results\\n show that prosocial behavior increased for the affective (“heart”) decision\\n mode. Further, individual differences in processing style did not predict\\n prosocial behavior and did not interact with the experimental\\n manipulation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":1,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":16.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/s1930297500008998\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s1930297500008998","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 2

摘要

研究了决策模式(理性“脑”vs情感“心”)的实验操作和加工方式(直觉vs深思)的个体差异对亲社会行为的影响。在一项针对瑞典人口(n = 1828)的不同样本的调查实验中，我们引出了个人的处理风格，并通过实验操纵了对情感或理性的依赖，而不考虑受试者的偏好模式。亲社会行为是通过一系列常用的激励游戏(囚徒困境游戏、公共物品游戏、信任游戏、独裁者游戏)来衡量的。我们的研究结果表明，亲社会行为在情感(“心”)决策模式下增加。此外，加工风格的个体差异并不能预测亲社会行为，也与实验操作没有相互作用。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Affect and prosocial behavior: The role of decision mode and individual processing style

We study the effects of experimental manipulation of decision mode (rational “brain” vs. affective “heart”) and individual difference in processing styles (intuition vs. deliberation) on prosocial behavior. In a survey experiment with a diverse sample of the Swedish population (n = 1,828), we elicited the individuals’ processing style and we experimentally manipulated reliance on affect or reason, regardless of subjects’ preferred mode. Prosocial behavior was measured across a series of commonly used and incentivized games (prisoner’s dilemma game, public goods game, trust game, dictator game). Our results show that prosocial behavior increased for the affective (“heart”) decision mode. Further, individual differences in processing style did not predict prosocial behavior and did not interact with the experimental manipulation.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合

CiteScore

31.40

自引率

1.10%

发文量

312

审稿时长

2 months

期刊介绍： Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.