亲生物制度：在经济与自然之间建立新的团结

IF 2.1 3区社会学 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY

Daedalus Pub Date : 2023-02-01 DOI:10.1162/daed_a_01964

Natasha N. Iskander, N. Lowe

{"title":"亲生物制度：在经济与自然之间建立新的团结","authors":"Natasha N. Iskander, N. Lowe","doi":"10.1162/daed_a_01964","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Climate change and economic insecurity are the two most pressing challenges for modern humanity, and they are intimately linked: climate warming intensifies existing structural inequities, just as economic disparities worsen climate-induced suffering. Yet precisely because this economy-nature interrelationship is institutionalized, there exists an opening for alternative institutional configurations to take root. In this essay, we make the case for that institutional remaking to be biophilic, meaning it supports rather than undermines life and livelihood. This is not speculative thinking: biophilic institutions already exist in the here and now. Their existence provides an opportunity to learn how to remake institutions founded on solidarities of shared aliveness and a shared alliance with life that advance the premise that nature and the economy are not just intertwined but indistinguishable.","PeriodicalId":47980,"journal":{"name":"Daedalus","volume":"152 1","pages":"81-93"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Biophilic Institutions: Building New Solidarities between the Economy & Nature\",\"authors\":\"Natasha N. Iskander, N. Lowe\",\"doi\":\"10.1162/daed_a_01964\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Climate change and economic insecurity are the two most pressing challenges for modern humanity, and they are intimately linked: climate warming intensifies existing structural inequities, just as economic disparities worsen climate-induced suffering. Yet precisely because this economy-nature interrelationship is institutionalized, there exists an opening for alternative institutional configurations to take root. In this essay, we make the case for that institutional remaking to be biophilic, meaning it supports rather than undermines life and livelihood. This is not speculative thinking: biophilic institutions already exist in the here and now. Their existence provides an opportunity to learn how to remake institutions founded on solidarities of shared aliveness and a shared alliance with life that advance the premise that nature and the economy are not just intertwined but indistinguishable.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47980,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Daedalus\",\"volume\":\"152 1\",\"pages\":\"81-93\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Daedalus\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1162/daed_a_01964\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Daedalus","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1162/daed_a_01964","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 2

摘要

气候变化和经济不安全是现代人类面临的两个最紧迫的挑战，它们密切相关:气候变暖加剧了现有的结构性不平等，正如经济差距加剧了气候导致的痛苦。然而，正是因为这种经济与自然的相互关系是制度化的，所以存在着一种可供选择的制度配置扎根的机会。在这篇文章中，我们提出了这种制度重塑是亲生物的，这意味着它支持而不是破坏生活和生计。这不是推测性的思考:亲生物机构已经存在于此时此地。它们的存在提供了一个学习如何重建建立在共享活力和与生命共同联盟的团结基础上的制度的机会，这种团结推进了自然和经济不仅交织在一起而且不可区分的前提。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Biophilic Institutions: Building New Solidarities between the Economy & Nature

Abstract Climate change and economic insecurity are the two most pressing challenges for modern humanity, and they are intimately linked: climate warming intensifies existing structural inequities, just as economic disparities worsen climate-induced suffering. Yet precisely because this economy-nature interrelationship is institutionalized, there exists an opening for alternative institutional configurations to take root. In this essay, we make the case for that institutional remaking to be biophilic, meaning it supports rather than undermines life and livelihood. This is not speculative thinking: biophilic institutions already exist in the here and now. Their existence provides an opportunity to learn how to remake institutions founded on solidarities of shared aliveness and a shared alliance with life that advance the premise that nature and the economy are not just intertwined but indistinguishable.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Daedalus Multiple-

CiteScore

3.50

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Daedalus was founded in 1955 as the Journal of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences. It draws on the enormous intellectual capacity of the American Academy, whose members are among the nation"s most prominent thinkers in the arts, sciences, and humanities. Each issue addresses a theme with authoritative essays on topics such as judicial independence, reflecting on the humanities, the global nuclear future, the challenge of mass incarceration, the future of news, the economy, the military, and race.