解决阿氏扁尾蠊(Steironotus arenarius Tschudi)的模糊身份,1845年和Tropidurus Tschudi Roux,1907年(角鲨目:Tropiduridae)

Pub Date : 2021-01-11 DOI:10.2994/SAJH-D-19-00094.1
A. Carvalho
{"title":"解决阿氏扁尾蠊(Steironotus arenarius Tschudi)的模糊身份,1845年和Tropidurus Tschudi Roux,1907年(角鲨目:Tropiduridae)","authors":"A. Carvalho","doi":"10.2994/SAJH-D-19-00094.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract. The taxonomic history of Steironotus arenarius Tschudi, 1845 is one of the most problematic among all tropidurids. The species was originally described supposedly based on four specimens collected in Peru and deposited by J.J. von Tschudi at the Musée d'Histoire Naturelle de Neuchâtel, Switzerland. However, the syntypes were not re-examined until Roux (1907: Rev. Suisse Zool. 15:293–303) performed a revision of Tschudi's Peruvian collection. Fritts (1974: Mem. San Diego Soc. Nat. Hist. 7:1–89) revised the taxonomy of Stenocercus and endorsed Roux's allocation of Steironotus arenarius in Tropidurus Wied, 1825, although he never analyzed Tschudi's types. Ortiz (1989: Bull. Soc. Neuchâtel. Sci. Nat. 112:47–64) was the first contemporary systematist to re-analyze Tschudi's specimens for his catalogue of the lizard types of the Musée d'Histoire Naturelle de Neuchâtel. His compilation attempted to clarify the number, location, and identity of the types of Steironotus arenarius found at the Musée d'Histoire Naturelle de Neuchâtel and Naturhistorisches Museum Basel. Subsequent authors overlooked or opted for not following Ortiz and endorsed the allocation of Steironotus arenarius in Tropidurus. Although Ortiz was the only one to re-analyze the types of Steironotus arenarius after Roux, he never provided full morphological descriptions or detailed comparative notes to support his taxonomic conclusions. Herein, I clarify the taxonomic history of Steironotus arenarius Tschudi, 1845 and Tropidurus tschudii Roux, 1907, and confirm that Tschudi's syntypic series is a composite of two genera, i.e., Microlophus Duméril and Bibron, 1837 and Stenocercus Duméril and Bibron, 1837. I ultimately designate a new lectotype for Steironotus arenarius Tschudi, 1845 and provide recommendations for correcting uncorroborated taxonomic arrangements, bringing stability to tropidurid taxonomy.","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-01-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Resolving the Obscure Identity of Steironotus arenarius Tschudi, 1845 and Tropidurus tschudii Roux, 1907 (Squamata: Tropiduridae)\",\"authors\":\"A. Carvalho\",\"doi\":\"10.2994/SAJH-D-19-00094.1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract. The taxonomic history of Steironotus arenarius Tschudi, 1845 is one of the most problematic among all tropidurids. The species was originally described supposedly based on four specimens collected in Peru and deposited by J.J. von Tschudi at the Musée d'Histoire Naturelle de Neuchâtel, Switzerland. However, the syntypes were not re-examined until Roux (1907: Rev. Suisse Zool. 15:293–303) performed a revision of Tschudi's Peruvian collection. Fritts (1974: Mem. San Diego Soc. Nat. Hist. 7:1–89) revised the taxonomy of Stenocercus and endorsed Roux's allocation of Steironotus arenarius in Tropidurus Wied, 1825, although he never analyzed Tschudi's types. Ortiz (1989: Bull. Soc. Neuchâtel. Sci. Nat. 112:47–64) was the first contemporary systematist to re-analyze Tschudi's specimens for his catalogue of the lizard types of the Musée d'Histoire Naturelle de Neuchâtel. His compilation attempted to clarify the number, location, and identity of the types of Steironotus arenarius found at the Musée d'Histoire Naturelle de Neuchâtel and Naturhistorisches Museum Basel. Subsequent authors overlooked or opted for not following Ortiz and endorsed the allocation of Steironotus arenarius in Tropidurus. Although Ortiz was the only one to re-analyze the types of Steironotus arenarius after Roux, he never provided full morphological descriptions or detailed comparative notes to support his taxonomic conclusions. Herein, I clarify the taxonomic history of Steironotus arenarius Tschudi, 1845 and Tropidurus tschudii Roux, 1907, and confirm that Tschudi's syntypic series is a composite of two genera, i.e., Microlophus Duméril and Bibron, 1837 and Stenocercus Duméril and Bibron, 1837. I ultimately designate a new lectotype for Steironotus arenarius Tschudi, 1845 and provide recommendations for correcting uncorroborated taxonomic arrangements, bringing stability to tropidurid taxonomy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":0,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2994/SAJH-D-19-00094.1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2994/SAJH-D-19-00094.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要阿氏锥藻(Steironotus arenarius Tschudi,1845)的分类史是所有热带动物中最有问题的一个。该物种最初被描述为基于在秘鲁收集的四个标本,这些标本由J.J.von Tschudi存放在瑞士新城堡自然历史博物馆。然而,直到Roux(1907年:Rev.Suisse Zool.15:293–303)对Tschudi的秘鲁收藏进行了修订,才对同型进行了重新检查。Fritts(1974年:圣地亚哥大学自然科学院院士,历史,7:1-89)修订了Stenocerus的分类法,并支持Roux在1825年的Tropidurus Wied中对Steironotus arenarius的分配,尽管他从未分析过Tschudi的类型。奥尔蒂斯(1989年:Bull.Soc.Neuchâtel.Sci.Nat.112:47-64)是第一位重新分析Tschudi标本的当代系统主义者,他为Neuchâtel自然历史博物馆的蜥蜴类型编目。他的汇编试图澄清在新城堡自然历史博物馆和巴塞尔自然历史博物馆发现的阿雷纳里乌斯类型的数量、位置和身份。随后的作者忽视或选择不追随奥尔蒂斯,并支持在Tropidurus分配Steironotus arenarius。尽管Ortiz是唯一一个在Roux之后重新分析阿氏Steironotus arenarius类型的人,但他从未提供完整的形态学描述或详细的比较注释来支持他的分类学结论。在此,我澄清了阿氏Steironotus arenarius Tschudi,1845和Tropidurus Tschudi-Roux,1907的分类历史,并证实Tschudi的同型系列是由两个属组成的,即Microlophus Duméril和Bibron,1837和Stenocercus Dumériel和Bibrown,1837。我最终为阿氏Steironotus arenarius Tschudi指定了一个新的选择型,1845年,并为纠正未经证实的分类安排提供了建议,为热带分类学带来了稳定性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享
查看原文
Resolving the Obscure Identity of Steironotus arenarius Tschudi, 1845 and Tropidurus tschudii Roux, 1907 (Squamata: Tropiduridae)
Abstract. The taxonomic history of Steironotus arenarius Tschudi, 1845 is one of the most problematic among all tropidurids. The species was originally described supposedly based on four specimens collected in Peru and deposited by J.J. von Tschudi at the Musée d'Histoire Naturelle de Neuchâtel, Switzerland. However, the syntypes were not re-examined until Roux (1907: Rev. Suisse Zool. 15:293–303) performed a revision of Tschudi's Peruvian collection. Fritts (1974: Mem. San Diego Soc. Nat. Hist. 7:1–89) revised the taxonomy of Stenocercus and endorsed Roux's allocation of Steironotus arenarius in Tropidurus Wied, 1825, although he never analyzed Tschudi's types. Ortiz (1989: Bull. Soc. Neuchâtel. Sci. Nat. 112:47–64) was the first contemporary systematist to re-analyze Tschudi's specimens for his catalogue of the lizard types of the Musée d'Histoire Naturelle de Neuchâtel. His compilation attempted to clarify the number, location, and identity of the types of Steironotus arenarius found at the Musée d'Histoire Naturelle de Neuchâtel and Naturhistorisches Museum Basel. Subsequent authors overlooked or opted for not following Ortiz and endorsed the allocation of Steironotus arenarius in Tropidurus. Although Ortiz was the only one to re-analyze the types of Steironotus arenarius after Roux, he never provided full morphological descriptions or detailed comparative notes to support his taxonomic conclusions. Herein, I clarify the taxonomic history of Steironotus arenarius Tschudi, 1845 and Tropidurus tschudii Roux, 1907, and confirm that Tschudi's syntypic series is a composite of two genera, i.e., Microlophus Duméril and Bibron, 1837 and Stenocercus Duméril and Bibron, 1837. I ultimately designate a new lectotype for Steironotus arenarius Tschudi, 1845 and provide recommendations for correcting uncorroborated taxonomic arrangements, bringing stability to tropidurid taxonomy.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信