从南方语境探讨鱼尾点的技术选择:比较综述

IF 1.6 Q1 ANTHROPOLOGY

PaleoAmerica Pub Date : 2022-01-02 DOI:10.1080/20555563.2021.2000090

D. Hermo, L. Miotti, E. Terranova

{"title":"从南方语境探讨鱼尾点的技术选择:比较综述","authors":"D. Hermo, L. Miotti, E. Terranova","doi":"10.1080/20555563.2021.2000090","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT In this paper, we seek to understand the variabilility in the technology of Fishtail points (FTPs). For this purpose, we consider three questions as a starting point: (a) How were FTPs made? (b) What were FTPs made for? and (c) Who made them? To answer these questions we analyze a sample from several archaeological sites in Argentinean Patagonia. We differentiate knapping stages and evaluate weapon systems using a wide set of variables to assign the lithic heads to specific weapons. Finally, we interpret the results, taking into account the provenance context of the sample. In agreement with previous results, we propose that there were at least two ways to manufacture FTP points, and these objects had acted probably in two different weapons systems. Furthermore, we propose that FTPs may be related to a multiplicity of actors, involving kids, apprentices, and experts, as well as different use contexts.","PeriodicalId":37319,"journal":{"name":"PaleoAmerica","volume":"8 1","pages":"79 - 94"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring Technological Choices in Fishtail Points from Southern Contexts: A Comparative Overview\",\"authors\":\"D. Hermo, L. Miotti, E. Terranova\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/20555563.2021.2000090\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT In this paper, we seek to understand the variabilility in the technology of Fishtail points (FTPs). For this purpose, we consider three questions as a starting point: (a) How were FTPs made? (b) What were FTPs made for? and (c) Who made them? To answer these questions we analyze a sample from several archaeological sites in Argentinean Patagonia. We differentiate knapping stages and evaluate weapon systems using a wide set of variables to assign the lithic heads to specific weapons. Finally, we interpret the results, taking into account the provenance context of the sample. In agreement with previous results, we propose that there were at least two ways to manufacture FTP points, and these objects had acted probably in two different weapons systems. Furthermore, we propose that FTPs may be related to a multiplicity of actors, involving kids, apprentices, and experts, as well as different use contexts.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37319,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PaleoAmerica\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"79 - 94\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PaleoAmerica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/20555563.2021.2000090\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ANTHROPOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PaleoAmerica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20555563.2021.2000090","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 4

摘要

摘要在本文中，我们试图理解鱼尾点技术的可变性。为此，我们考虑了三个问题作为出发点：（a）FTP是如何制定的？（b） FTP的用途是什么？（c）是谁制造的？为了回答这些问题，我们分析了阿根廷巴塔哥尼亚几个考古遗址的样本。我们区分粉碎阶段，并使用一组广泛的变量来评估武器系统，以将石器时代的头部分配给特定的武器。最后，我们对结果进行了解释，同时考虑了样本的来源背景。与之前的结果一致，我们提出至少有两种制造FTP点的方法，这些物体可能在两种不同的武器系统中起作用。此外，我们提出，FTP可能与多种参与者有关，包括儿童、学徒和专家，以及不同的使用环境。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Exploring Technological Choices in Fishtail Points from Southern Contexts: A Comparative Overview

ABSTRACT In this paper, we seek to understand the variabilility in the technology of Fishtail points (FTPs). For this purpose, we consider three questions as a starting point: (a) How were FTPs made? (b) What were FTPs made for? and (c) Who made them? To answer these questions we analyze a sample from several archaeological sites in Argentinean Patagonia. We differentiate knapping stages and evaluate weapon systems using a wide set of variables to assign the lithic heads to specific weapons. Finally, we interpret the results, taking into account the provenance context of the sample. In agreement with previous results, we propose that there were at least two ways to manufacture FTP points, and these objects had acted probably in two different weapons systems. Furthermore, we propose that FTPs may be related to a multiplicity of actors, involving kids, apprentices, and experts, as well as different use contexts.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

PaleoAmerica Earth and Planetary Sciences-Paleontology

CiteScore

3.70

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： PaleoAmerica disseminates new research results and ideas about early human dispersal and migrations, with a particular focus on the Americas. It fosters an interdisciplinary dialog between archaeologists, geneticists and other scientists investigating the dispersal of modern humans during the late Pleistocene. The journal has three goals: First and foremost, the journal is a vehicle for the presentation of new research results. Second, it includes editorials on special topics written by leaders in the field. Third, the journal solicits essays covering current debates in the field, the state of research in relevant disciplines, and summaries of new research findings in a particular region, for example Beringia, the Eastern Seaboard or the Southern Cone of South America. Although the journal’s focus is the peopling of the Americas, editorials and research essays also highlight the investigation of early human colonization of empty lands in other areas of the world. As techniques are developing so rapidly, work in other regions can be very relevant to the Americas, so the journal will publish research relating to other regions which has relevance to research on the Americas.