忘记富布赖特:阿肯色大学反对种族主义的公共记忆

IF 1.1 1区文学 Q3 COMMUNICATION

Communication and Critical-Cultural Studies Pub Date : 2023-01-02 DOI:10.1080/14791420.2023.2169313

T. Dionne, J. Hatfield, Nabiha Khetani, Joel Metcalf

{"title":"忘记富布赖特:阿肯色大学反对种族主义的公共记忆","authors":"T. Dionne, J. Hatfield, Nabiha Khetani, Joel Metcalf","doi":"10.1080/14791420.2023.2169313","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT In summer 2020 at the University of Arkansas, a Black-led protest movement known as #BlackatUARK challenged the presence of a statue to William J. Fulbright due to his racist voting record. Despite the Arkansas state legislature quickly passing a law that made the removal of the memorial illegal, contributors to #BlackatUARK demonstrated how to forget Fulbright by recontextualizing his memory as continuous with a broader history of anti-Blackness on campus. We argue that efforts to forget Fulbright are skillful techniques of anti-racist communication that can be understood as (1) deep ecological worldmaking, (2) wake work, and (3) dissonant history generation.","PeriodicalId":46339,"journal":{"name":"Communication and Critical-Cultural Studies","volume":"20 1","pages":"16 - 23"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Forgetting Fulbright: opposing racist public memory at the University of Arkansas\",\"authors\":\"T. Dionne, J. Hatfield, Nabiha Khetani, Joel Metcalf\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14791420.2023.2169313\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT In summer 2020 at the University of Arkansas, a Black-led protest movement known as #BlackatUARK challenged the presence of a statue to William J. Fulbright due to his racist voting record. Despite the Arkansas state legislature quickly passing a law that made the removal of the memorial illegal, contributors to #BlackatUARK demonstrated how to forget Fulbright by recontextualizing his memory as continuous with a broader history of anti-Blackness on campus. We argue that efforts to forget Fulbright are skillful techniques of anti-racist communication that can be understood as (1) deep ecological worldmaking, (2) wake work, and (3) dissonant history generation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46339,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Communication and Critical-Cultural Studies\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"16 - 23\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Communication and Critical-Cultural Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14791420.2023.2169313\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"COMMUNICATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Communication and Critical-Cultural Studies","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14791420.2023.2169313","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要2020年夏天，在阿肯色大学，一场名为#BlackatUARK的黑人领导的抗议运动因威廉·J·富布赖特的种族主义投票记录而对其雕像的存在提出质疑。尽管阿肯色州议会很快通过了一项法律，将拆除纪念馆定为非法，但#BlackatUARK的贡献者展示了如何忘记富布赖特，将他的记忆重新文本化，使其与校园内更广泛的反黑人历史相联系。我们认为，忘记富布赖特的努力是反种族主义沟通的巧妙技巧，可以理解为（1）深层生态世界创造，（2）唤醒工作，以及（3）不和谐的历史生成。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Forgetting Fulbright: opposing racist public memory at the University of Arkansas

ABSTRACT In summer 2020 at the University of Arkansas, a Black-led protest movement known as #BlackatUARK challenged the presence of a statue to William J. Fulbright due to his racist voting record. Despite the Arkansas state legislature quickly passing a law that made the removal of the memorial illegal, contributors to #BlackatUARK demonstrated how to forget Fulbright by recontextualizing his memory as continuous with a broader history of anti-Blackness on campus. We argue that efforts to forget Fulbright are skillful techniques of anti-racist communication that can be understood as (1) deep ecological worldmaking, (2) wake work, and (3) dissonant history generation.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Communication and Critical-Cultural Studies Multiple-

CiteScore

3.10

自引率

10.50%

发文量

期刊介绍： Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies (CC/CS) is a peer-reviewed publication of the National Communication Association. CC/CS publishes original scholarship that situates culture as a site of struggle and communication as an enactment and discipline of power. The journal features critical inquiry that cuts across academic and theoretical boundaries. CC/CS welcomes a variety of methods including textual, discourse, and rhetorical analyses alongside auto/ethnographic, narrative, and poetic inquiry.