重新审视计算之争:对多尺度方法的呼唤

IF 0.8 Q3 POLITICAL SCIENCE
Fikret Adaman, P. Devine
{"title":"重新审视计算之争:对多尺度方法的呼唤","authors":"Fikret Adaman, P. Devine","doi":"10.1080/08935696.2022.2051374","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This essay provides a framework to develop policies that can both resist the capitalist system and formulate alternatives to it, by critically reviewing discussions of an ecosocialist society and its economic organization through revisiting the “calculation debate” that was started in the 1930s and is still ongoing. It underlines the importance of repoliticizing the economic sphere to reembed the economy in society rather than society being subordinated to the economy. To that aim, it emphasizes the gravity of (1) planning our future, (2) coordinating our decisions before we embark on any action, (3) relying on knowledge in different forms and formats as articulated at both the individual and societal level, and (4) generating real democracy via participatory and deliberative mechanisms. Finally, the essay critically assesses progressive responses to current economic, ecological, and health crises and, because local and macro initiatives are equally important and feed one another positively, advocates for adopting a multiscale approach.","PeriodicalId":45610,"journal":{"name":"Rethinking Marxism-A Journal of Economics Culture & Society","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Revisiting the Calculation Debate: A Call for a Multiscale Approach\",\"authors\":\"Fikret Adaman, P. Devine\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/08935696.2022.2051374\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This essay provides a framework to develop policies that can both resist the capitalist system and formulate alternatives to it, by critically reviewing discussions of an ecosocialist society and its economic organization through revisiting the “calculation debate” that was started in the 1930s and is still ongoing. It underlines the importance of repoliticizing the economic sphere to reembed the economy in society rather than society being subordinated to the economy. To that aim, it emphasizes the gravity of (1) planning our future, (2) coordinating our decisions before we embark on any action, (3) relying on knowledge in different forms and formats as articulated at both the individual and societal level, and (4) generating real democracy via participatory and deliberative mechanisms. Finally, the essay critically assesses progressive responses to current economic, ecological, and health crises and, because local and macro initiatives are equally important and feed one another positively, advocates for adopting a multiscale approach.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45610,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Rethinking Marxism-A Journal of Economics Culture & Society\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Rethinking Marxism-A Journal of Economics Culture & Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/08935696.2022.2051374\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"POLITICAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rethinking Marxism-A Journal of Economics Culture & Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08935696.2022.2051374","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

这篇文章提供了一个框架,通过批判性地回顾生态社会主义社会及其经济组织的讨论,通过重新审视始于20世纪30年代并仍在进行的“计算辩论”,来制定既能抵制资本主义制度又能制定替代方案的政策。它强调了将经济领域重新政治化以使经济重新融入社会的重要性,而不是使社会从属于经济。为此,它强调了以下几点的重要性:(1)规划我们的未来;(2)在我们开始任何行动之前协调我们的决定;(3)依靠个人和社会层面上阐述的不同形式和格式的知识;(4)通过参与和审议机制产生真正的民主。最后,本文批判性地评估了对当前经济、生态和健康危机的渐进应对措施,由于地方和宏观举措同等重要,相互促进,因此提倡采用多尺度方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Revisiting the Calculation Debate: A Call for a Multiscale Approach
This essay provides a framework to develop policies that can both resist the capitalist system and formulate alternatives to it, by critically reviewing discussions of an ecosocialist society and its economic organization through revisiting the “calculation debate” that was started in the 1930s and is still ongoing. It underlines the importance of repoliticizing the economic sphere to reembed the economy in society rather than society being subordinated to the economy. To that aim, it emphasizes the gravity of (1) planning our future, (2) coordinating our decisions before we embark on any action, (3) relying on knowledge in different forms and formats as articulated at both the individual and societal level, and (4) generating real democracy via participatory and deliberative mechanisms. Finally, the essay critically assesses progressive responses to current economic, ecological, and health crises and, because local and macro initiatives are equally important and feed one another positively, advocates for adopting a multiscale approach.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
20.00%
发文量
30
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信