理想类型的因果解释维度:马克斯·韦伯对当代社会学的方法论贡献
IF 4.1
2区 社会学
Q1 POLITICAL SCIENCE
引用次数: 0
摘要
本文从罗兰吉尔的非陈述观点出发，对马克斯·韦伯的理想类型进行解读和更新。根据后者，理论由理论模型和假设组成。由此，韦伯的理想类型不是由实质性命题构成的，而是由无法证伪的理论理想化构成的，然而，假设是从这些理想化中衍生出来的，可以证伪或证实。理想韦伯类型的认识论地位不是由描述性因果命题构成，而是由定义构成。通过这种方式，我们不仅获得了对韦伯认识论遗产的新解释，而且为其与当前科学哲学的对话开辟了道路。本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。
A dimensão causal-explicativa dos tipos ideais: a contribuição metodológica de Max Weber para a sociologia contemporânea
The article proposes a reading and updating of the ideal type of Max Weber from RolandGiere’s non-statement view. According to the latter, theories consist of theoretical models andhypotheses. From this, the ideal types of Weber do not consist of substantive propositions, butof theoretical idealizations that cannot be falsified, from which, however, hypotheses are derivedto be falsified or confirmed. The epistemological status of ideal Weber types does not consistof descriptive-causal propositions, but of definitions. In this way we achieve not only a newinterpretation of the weberian epistemological legacy, but also open the way for its interlocutionwith the current philosophy of science.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。
去求助
来源期刊
Politics & Society
Multiple-
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
4.20%
发文量
16
期刊介绍：
Politics & Society is a peer-reviewed journal. All submitted papers are read by a rotating editorial board member. If a paper is deemed potentially publishable, it is sent to another board member, who, if agreeing that it is potentially publishable, sends it to a third board member. If and only if all three agree, the paper is sent to the entire editorial board for consideration at board meetings. The editorial board meets three times a year, and the board members who are present (usually between 9 and 14) make decisions through a deliberative process that also considers written reports from absent members. Unlike many journals which rely on 1–3 individual blind referee reports and a single editor with final say, the peers who decide whether to accept submitted work are thus the full editorial board of the journal, comprised of scholars from various disciplines, who discuss papers openly, with author names known, at meetings. Editors are required to disclose potential conflicts of interest when evaluating manuscripts and to recuse themselves from voting if such a potential exists.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
