“分类”与“类型学”概念的解释学

Ion Postu, Veronica Rusnac
{"title":"“分类”与“类型学”概念的解释学","authors":"Ion Postu, Veronica Rusnac","doi":"10.54481/sju.2022.1.04","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this article, the authors interpret the polyvalence of the notions of classification and typology, in order to highlight specific features and divergent elements. Some definitions are discussed and the dual nature of classification—as a process and as an outcome—is highlighted. Classification and typology are seen as conceptual operations, which are united by a single goal — the ordering of a given set of objects. The authors conclude that classification focuses on classes, and typology — on types, and that within classifications each element can be assigned to a single class, depending on the criterion chosen for differentiation, but within typology — the same element can be part of several types. In the context of the systematization of contemporary legal systems, the authors state that some of them cannot be attributed to any class, which goes against the logic of classification, instead, from the point of view of typology, there may be atypical legal systems, which they do not contain elements specific to any type.","PeriodicalId":52793,"journal":{"name":"Studii Juridice Universitare","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Hermeneutics of the Notions of “classification” and “typology”\",\"authors\":\"Ion Postu, Veronica Rusnac\",\"doi\":\"10.54481/sju.2022.1.04\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this article, the authors interpret the polyvalence of the notions of classification and typology, in order to highlight specific features and divergent elements. Some definitions are discussed and the dual nature of classification—as a process and as an outcome—is highlighted. Classification and typology are seen as conceptual operations, which are united by a single goal — the ordering of a given set of objects. The authors conclude that classification focuses on classes, and typology — on types, and that within classifications each element can be assigned to a single class, depending on the criterion chosen for differentiation, but within typology — the same element can be part of several types. In the context of the systematization of contemporary legal systems, the authors state that some of them cannot be attributed to any class, which goes against the logic of classification, instead, from the point of view of typology, there may be atypical legal systems, which they do not contain elements specific to any type.\",\"PeriodicalId\":52793,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Studii Juridice Universitare\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Studii Juridice Universitare\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.54481/sju.2022.1.04\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studii Juridice Universitare","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54481/sju.2022.1.04","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在这篇文章中,作者解释了分类和类型学概念的多元性,以突出特定的特征和不同的元素。讨论了一些定义,并强调了分类的双重性质——作为一个过程和一个结果。分类和类型学被视为概念操作,它们由一个单一的目标统一在一起——一组给定对象的排序。作者得出的结论是,分类侧重于类,类型学侧重于类型,在分类中,每个元素都可以分配给一个类,这取决于选择的区分标准,但在类型学中,同一元素可以是几个类型的一部分。在当代法律制度系统化的背景下,作者指出,其中一些法律制度不能归属于任何类别,这违背了分类逻辑,相反,从类型学的角度来看,可能存在非典型法律制度,它们不包含任何类型特有的要素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Hermeneutics of the Notions of “classification” and “typology”
In this article, the authors interpret the polyvalence of the notions of classification and typology, in order to highlight specific features and divergent elements. Some definitions are discussed and the dual nature of classification—as a process and as an outcome—is highlighted. Classification and typology are seen as conceptual operations, which are united by a single goal — the ordering of a given set of objects. The authors conclude that classification focuses on classes, and typology — on types, and that within classifications each element can be assigned to a single class, depending on the criterion chosen for differentiation, but within typology — the same element can be part of several types. In the context of the systematization of contemporary legal systems, the authors state that some of them cannot be attributed to any class, which goes against the logic of classification, instead, from the point of view of typology, there may be atypical legal systems, which they do not contain elements specific to any type.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信