两种人工智能，或者如何不混淆对象和主体

IF 1 4区综合性期刊 Q3 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES

Interdisciplinary Science Reviews Pub Date : 2023-01-02 DOI:10.1080/03080188.2022.2158258

A. Blackwell

{"title":"两种人工智能，或者如何不混淆对象和主体","authors":"A. Blackwell","doi":"10.1080/03080188.2022.2158258","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The following essay is a stylistic experiment for Interdisciplinary Science Reviews, re ﬂ ecting on a personal research agenda and trajectory, in relation to the disciplines that the author has engaged with. Interdisciplinary enquiry often arises from the idiosyncratic experiences and decisions of an individual serendipitously following curiosity, alongside the practical contingencies that shape anybody ’ s career. Such a re ﬂ ection, if spanning multiple disciplines through the perspective of one person, cannot possibly be comprehensive, and will certainly expose the gaps in knowledge and loss of rigour that could have been corrected within a single discipline. The intention in presenting such a personal agenda is not to be de ﬁ nitive, but rather to open up discussion by pulling on the loose threads at the edges of discipline. The primary goal of the experiment is to unsettle established disciplinary perspectives, even where the same questions could have been addressed more authorita-tively in another ﬁ eld. 1","PeriodicalId":50352,"journal":{"name":"Interdisciplinary Science Reviews","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The two kinds of artificial intelligence, or how not to confuse objects and subjects\",\"authors\":\"A. Blackwell\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/03080188.2022.2158258\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The following essay is a stylistic experiment for Interdisciplinary Science Reviews, re ﬂ ecting on a personal research agenda and trajectory, in relation to the disciplines that the author has engaged with. Interdisciplinary enquiry often arises from the idiosyncratic experiences and decisions of an individual serendipitously following curiosity, alongside the practical contingencies that shape anybody ’ s career. Such a re ﬂ ection, if spanning multiple disciplines through the perspective of one person, cannot possibly be comprehensive, and will certainly expose the gaps in knowledge and loss of rigour that could have been corrected within a single discipline. The intention in presenting such a personal agenda is not to be de ﬁ nitive, but rather to open up discussion by pulling on the loose threads at the edges of discipline. The primary goal of the experiment is to unsettle established disciplinary perspectives, even where the same questions could have been addressed more authorita-tively in another ﬁ eld. 1\",\"PeriodicalId\":50352,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Interdisciplinary Science Reviews\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Interdisciplinary Science Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"103\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/03080188.2022.2158258\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"综合性期刊\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interdisciplinary Science Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/03080188.2022.2158258","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

以下文章是《跨学科科学评论》的文体实验，反映了作者所从事学科的个人研究议程和轨迹。跨学科的探究往往源于一个人偶然遵循好奇心的特殊经历和决定，以及塑造任何人职业生涯的实际突发事件。如果从一个人的角度跨越多个学科，这种反思就不可能是全面的，而且肯定会暴露出本可以在一个学科内纠正的知识差距和严谨性的丧失。提出这样一个个人议程的目的不是要明确，而是通过抓住学科边缘的松散线索来展开讨论。该实验的主要目标是扰乱既定的学科观点，即使同样的问题本可以在另一个领域得到更权威的解决。1.

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

The two kinds of artificial intelligence, or how not to confuse objects and subjects

The following essay is a stylistic experiment for Interdisciplinary Science Reviews, re ﬂ ecting on a personal research agenda and trajectory, in relation to the disciplines that the author has engaged with. Interdisciplinary enquiry often arises from the idiosyncratic experiences and decisions of an individual serendipitously following curiosity, alongside the practical contingencies that shape anybody ’ s career. Such a re ﬂ ection, if spanning multiple disciplines through the perspective of one person, cannot possibly be comprehensive, and will certainly expose the gaps in knowledge and loss of rigour that could have been corrected within a single discipline. The intention in presenting such a personal agenda is not to be de ﬁ nitive, but rather to open up discussion by pulling on the loose threads at the edges of discipline. The primary goal of the experiment is to unsettle established disciplinary perspectives, even where the same questions could have been addressed more authorita-tively in another ﬁ eld. 1

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Interdisciplinary Science Reviews 综合性期刊-综合性期刊

CiteScore

2.30

自引率

9.10%

发文量

审稿时长

>12 weeks

期刊介绍： Interdisciplinary Science Reviews is a quarterly journal that aims to explore the social, philosophical and historical interrelations of the natural sciences, engineering, mathematics, medicine and technology with the social sciences, humanities and arts.