倒塌的纪念碑，不情愿的废墟:种族隔离建筑中过去的坚持

IF 0.4 3区历史学 Q1 HISTORY

South African Historical Journal Pub Date : 2022-01-02 DOI:10.1080/02582473.2022.2044375

D. Jethro

{"title":"倒塌的纪念碑，不情愿的废墟:种族隔离建筑中过去的坚持","authors":"D. Jethro","doi":"10.1080/02582473.2022.2044375","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"1. See, for example, the recent edited volume by M. Buthelezi, D. Skosana, and B. Vale, eds, Traditional Leaders in a Democracy: Resources, Respect and Resistance (Johannesburg: Mapungubwe Institute for Strategic Reflection, 2018). 2. See B. de Sousa Santos, ‘Law: AMap of Misreading; Toward a Postmodern Conception of Law’, Journal of Law and Society, 14, 3 (1987), 279–302. 3. R.W. Gordon, ‘Critical Legal Histories’, Stanford Law Review, 36 (1984), 57–125. 4. Gordon, ‘Critical Legal Histories’, 111. 5. S. Mnisi Weeks, Access to Justice and Human Security: Cultural Contradictions in Rural South Africa (London: Routledge, 2018). 6. B. Cousins and R. Hall, ‘Rural Land Tenure: The Potential and Limits of Rights-Based Approaches’, in M. Langford, B. Cousins, J. Dugard, and T. Madlingozi, eds, SocioEconomic Rights in South Africa: Symbols or Substance? (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2014), 159.","PeriodicalId":45116,"journal":{"name":"South African Historical Journal","volume":"74 1","pages":"200 - 203"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Falling Monuments, Reluctant Ruins: The Persistence of the Past in the Architecture of Apartheid\",\"authors\":\"D. Jethro\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/02582473.2022.2044375\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"1. See, for example, the recent edited volume by M. Buthelezi, D. Skosana, and B. Vale, eds, Traditional Leaders in a Democracy: Resources, Respect and Resistance (Johannesburg: Mapungubwe Institute for Strategic Reflection, 2018). 2. See B. de Sousa Santos, ‘Law: AMap of Misreading; Toward a Postmodern Conception of Law’, Journal of Law and Society, 14, 3 (1987), 279–302. 3. R.W. Gordon, ‘Critical Legal Histories’, Stanford Law Review, 36 (1984), 57–125. 4. Gordon, ‘Critical Legal Histories’, 111. 5. S. Mnisi Weeks, Access to Justice and Human Security: Cultural Contradictions in Rural South Africa (London: Routledge, 2018). 6. B. Cousins and R. Hall, ‘Rural Land Tenure: The Potential and Limits of Rights-Based Approaches’, in M. Langford, B. Cousins, J. Dugard, and T. Madlingozi, eds, SocioEconomic Rights in South Africa: Symbols or Substance? (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2014), 159.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45116,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"South African Historical Journal\",\"volume\":\"74 1\",\"pages\":\"200 - 203\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"South African Historical Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/02582473.2022.2044375\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"South African Historical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02582473.2022.2044375","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 3

摘要

1.例如，见M.Buthelezi、D.Skosana和B.Vale最近编辑的《民主中的传统领袖：资源、尊重和抵抗》（约翰内斯堡：马蓬古布韦战略反思研究所，2018）。2.见B.de Sousa Santos，《法律：误读的地图》；走向后现代法律观，《法律与社会杂志》，1987年第14、3期，第279-302页。3.R.W.Gordon，“批判性法律史”，《斯坦福法律评论》，第36期（1984年），第57–125页。4.戈登，《批判法律史》，111。5.S.Mnisi Weeks，《诉诸司法与人类安全：南非农村的文化矛盾》（伦敦：Routledge，2018）。6.B.Cousins和R.Hall，“农村土地保有权：基于权利的方法的潜力和局限性”，载于M.Langford、B.Cousin、J.Dugard和T.Madlingozi主编的《南非的社会经济权利：象征还是实质？（纽约：剑桥大学出版社，2014），159。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Falling Monuments, Reluctant Ruins: The Persistence of the Past in the Architecture of Apartheid

1. See, for example, the recent edited volume by M. Buthelezi, D. Skosana, and B. Vale, eds, Traditional Leaders in a Democracy: Resources, Respect and Resistance (Johannesburg: Mapungubwe Institute for Strategic Reflection, 2018). 2. See B. de Sousa Santos, ‘Law: AMap of Misreading; Toward a Postmodern Conception of Law’, Journal of Law and Society, 14, 3 (1987), 279–302. 3. R.W. Gordon, ‘Critical Legal Histories’, Stanford Law Review, 36 (1984), 57–125. 4. Gordon, ‘Critical Legal Histories’, 111. 5. S. Mnisi Weeks, Access to Justice and Human Security: Cultural Contradictions in Rural South Africa (London: Routledge, 2018). 6. B. Cousins and R. Hall, ‘Rural Land Tenure: The Potential and Limits of Rights-Based Approaches’, in M. Langford, B. Cousins, J. Dugard, and T. Madlingozi, eds, SocioEconomic Rights in South Africa: Symbols or Substance? (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2014), 159.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

South African Historical Journal Multiple-

CiteScore

0.70

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Over the past 40 years, the South African Historical Journal has become renowned and internationally regarded as a premier history journal published in South Africa, promoting significant historical scholarship on the country as well as the southern African region. The journal, which is linked to the Southern African Historical Society, has provided a high-quality medium for original thinking about South African history and has thus shaped - and continues to contribute towards defining - the historiography of the region.