解决问题的刑事司法:英格兰和威尔士的发展

IF 0.6 Q2 Social Sciences
J. Ward
{"title":"解决问题的刑事司法:英格兰和威尔士的发展","authors":"J. Ward","doi":"10.18352/ULR.472","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Problem-solving criminal justice is the court-based approach developed in efforts to tackle social, health and lifestyle problems linked to repeat patterns of criminal offending. Typically, these cover drug and alcohol dependence issues, mental disorder and youth and early independence vulnerabilities. This paper presents a critical analysis of three specific forms of problem-solving practiced in the English and Welsh court system – youth sentence review panels, the Family Drug and Alcohol courts and adult drugs courts. Empirical research is used to discuss the effectiveness and outcomes of these court approaches and argues realistic expectations in terms of what is considered ‘success’ for those attempting to become drug free, or establish conventional pathways and desist from crime, is essential. The barriers and obstacles preventing a more extensive application of problem-solving criminal justice is also discussed, drawing on points connected to sentencing parameters, ‘political will’ and legal cultural impediments. It is suggested if problem-solving justice is to become more widely established in local and geographical areas of need, alterations are needed to the way court innovation is enabled. Specifically, closer working relations between the professional judiciary and the large body of volunteer ‘lay’ magistrates who preside over much lower criminal court judging in England and Wales is necessary.","PeriodicalId":44535,"journal":{"name":"Utrecht Law Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Problem-Solving Criminal Justice: Developments in England and Wales\",\"authors\":\"J. Ward\",\"doi\":\"10.18352/ULR.472\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Problem-solving criminal justice is the court-based approach developed in efforts to tackle social, health and lifestyle problems linked to repeat patterns of criminal offending. Typically, these cover drug and alcohol dependence issues, mental disorder and youth and early independence vulnerabilities. This paper presents a critical analysis of three specific forms of problem-solving practiced in the English and Welsh court system – youth sentence review panels, the Family Drug and Alcohol courts and adult drugs courts. Empirical research is used to discuss the effectiveness and outcomes of these court approaches and argues realistic expectations in terms of what is considered ‘success’ for those attempting to become drug free, or establish conventional pathways and desist from crime, is essential. The barriers and obstacles preventing a more extensive application of problem-solving criminal justice is also discussed, drawing on points connected to sentencing parameters, ‘political will’ and legal cultural impediments. It is suggested if problem-solving justice is to become more widely established in local and geographical areas of need, alterations are needed to the way court innovation is enabled. Specifically, closer working relations between the professional judiciary and the large body of volunteer ‘lay’ magistrates who preside over much lower criminal court judging in England and Wales is necessary.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44535,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Utrecht Law Review\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-01-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Utrecht Law Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18352/ULR.472\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Utrecht Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18352/ULR.472","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

解决问题的刑事司法是在努力解决与重复犯罪模式有关的社会、健康和生活方式问题时制定的以法院为基础的办法。通常,这些问题包括药物和酒精依赖问题、精神障碍以及青年和早期独立的脆弱性。本文对英国和威尔士法院系统——青年判决审查小组、家庭毒品和酒精法庭和成人毒品法庭——实践的三种具体解决问题形式进行了批判性分析。实证研究用于讨论这些法院方法的有效性和结果,并认为对于那些试图摆脱毒品或建立传统途径并停止犯罪的人来说,什么是“成功”的现实期望是必不可少的。还讨论了阻碍更广泛地应用解决问题的刑事司法的障碍和障碍,并借鉴了与量刑参数、“政治意愿”和法律文化障碍有关的要点。有人建议,如果要使解决问题的司法在有需要的地方和地理区域得到更广泛的建立,就需要改变法院创新的方式。具体来说,在英格兰和威尔士,专业司法机构与大批志愿“外行”治安法官之间建立更密切的工作关系是必要的,这些地方法官主持低级刑事法院的审判。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Problem-Solving Criminal Justice: Developments in England and Wales
Problem-solving criminal justice is the court-based approach developed in efforts to tackle social, health and lifestyle problems linked to repeat patterns of criminal offending. Typically, these cover drug and alcohol dependence issues, mental disorder and youth and early independence vulnerabilities. This paper presents a critical analysis of three specific forms of problem-solving practiced in the English and Welsh court system – youth sentence review panels, the Family Drug and Alcohol courts and adult drugs courts. Empirical research is used to discuss the effectiveness and outcomes of these court approaches and argues realistic expectations in terms of what is considered ‘success’ for those attempting to become drug free, or establish conventional pathways and desist from crime, is essential. The barriers and obstacles preventing a more extensive application of problem-solving criminal justice is also discussed, drawing on points connected to sentencing parameters, ‘political will’ and legal cultural impediments. It is suggested if problem-solving justice is to become more widely established in local and geographical areas of need, alterations are needed to the way court innovation is enabled. Specifically, closer working relations between the professional judiciary and the large body of volunteer ‘lay’ magistrates who preside over much lower criminal court judging in England and Wales is necessary.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
审稿时长
17 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信