“可持续性减半”的未来:对Frank Adloff和Sighard Neckel研究项目的批评

IF 1.9 4区 社会学 Q2 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE
K. Brand
{"title":"“可持续性减半”的未来:对Frank Adloff和Sighard Neckel研究项目的批评","authors":"K. Brand","doi":"10.1177/05390184211005964","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"One of the central problems of social-theoretical sustainability studies is their high degree of arbitrariness. To increase the transparency of these studies, this article outlines a frame of reference for a systematic comparison of theoretical sustainability approaches that intends to clarify their thematic focus, theoretical premises, implicit assumptions and blind spots. This frame of reference will then be applied to the research program ‘Futures of Sustainability: Modernization, Transformation, Control’ directed by Frank Adloff and Sighard Neckel at the University of Hamburg.","PeriodicalId":47697,"journal":{"name":"Social Science Information Sur Les Sciences Sociales","volume":"60 1","pages":"272 - 284"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/05390184211005964","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Futures of a ‘halved sustainability’: Critical comments on Frank Adloff and Sighard Neckel’s research program\",\"authors\":\"K. Brand\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/05390184211005964\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"One of the central problems of social-theoretical sustainability studies is their high degree of arbitrariness. To increase the transparency of these studies, this article outlines a frame of reference for a systematic comparison of theoretical sustainability approaches that intends to clarify their thematic focus, theoretical premises, implicit assumptions and blind spots. This frame of reference will then be applied to the research program ‘Futures of Sustainability: Modernization, Transformation, Control’ directed by Frank Adloff and Sighard Neckel at the University of Hamburg.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47697,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Social Science Information Sur Les Sciences Sociales\",\"volume\":\"60 1\",\"pages\":\"272 - 284\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-05-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/05390184211005964\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Social Science Information Sur Les Sciences Sociales\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/05390184211005964\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Science Information Sur Les Sciences Sociales","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/05390184211005964","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

社会理论可持续性研究的核心问题之一是其高度的随意性。为了提高这些研究的透明度,本文概述了一个系统比较理论可持续性方法的参考框架,旨在澄清其主题焦点、理论前提、隐含假设和盲点。这一参考框架随后将应用于汉堡大学的Frank Adloff和Sighard Neckel指导的研究项目“可持续发展的未来:现代化、转型和控制”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Futures of a ‘halved sustainability’: Critical comments on Frank Adloff and Sighard Neckel’s research program
One of the central problems of social-theoretical sustainability studies is their high degree of arbitrariness. To increase the transparency of these studies, this article outlines a frame of reference for a systematic comparison of theoretical sustainability approaches that intends to clarify their thematic focus, theoretical premises, implicit assumptions and blind spots. This frame of reference will then be applied to the research program ‘Futures of Sustainability: Modernization, Transformation, Control’ directed by Frank Adloff and Sighard Neckel at the University of Hamburg.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
期刊介绍: Social Science Information is an international peer reviewed journal that publishes the highest quality original research in the social sciences at large with special focus on theoretical debates, methodology and comparative and (particularly) cross-cultural research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信