构建同期行为的综合得分:四种方法的比较

IF 16.4 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Matthew Kramer, Paul J. Weldon
{"title":"构建同期行为的综合得分:四种方法的比较","authors":"Matthew Kramer,&nbsp;Paul J. Weldon","doi":"10.1111/eth.13382","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Composite scores, where the results of two or more measures are combined, are commonly used in many fields, including ethology. Composite scores can simplify the analysis and interpretation of data while capturing the salient features of the underlying latent variable(s) approximated by the score. Here we outline four approaches for constructing composite scores in ethological studies: ad hoc (AH) assignment, discriminant analysis (DA), principal components analysis (PCA), and partial least squares (PLS). We give examples of each using previously published data from a study of responses of lone star ticks (<i>Amblyomma americanum</i>) to several deterrent phytochemicals. In most cases, researchers construct AH composite scores by subjectively assigning weights and signs to the behavioral components; unity weighting constrains weights to −1 or 1 on standardized variables. Because the weights and signs of the coefficients are subjectively assigned, AH scores may generate a spurious result. DA can be used to construct composite behavioral scores when there are clearly defined treatments or preference tests using distinct stimuli. The DA score created consists of orthogonal variables that capture the variability in the behavioral measures most closely aligned with the differences among treatment or stimuli variables. This approach assumes that subjects discriminate treatment or stimuli differences, but may not manifest clear overt behavior that they are able to do so; it reduces dimensionality, usually to a single axis, representing the underlying latent variable of interest. The PCA approach is similar to DA except that the composite score is created independently of treatment or stimuli variables. Thus, this method can be used to investigate possible relationships between a composite score and any relevant independent variable, perhaps measured asynchronously with the behaviors. PLS is a multivariate method related to DA and PCA and is also used to create latent orthogonal variables. However, these new variables are constructed to maximize correlation with one or more <i>continuous</i> independent variables. Creation of a composite score requires the researcher to consider not only the method used to create it, but, at an earlier stage in the research, which behaviors should be components and how best to measure them.</p>","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Constructing composite scores for contemporaneous behaviors: A comparison of four approaches\",\"authors\":\"Matthew Kramer,&nbsp;Paul J. Weldon\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/eth.13382\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Composite scores, where the results of two or more measures are combined, are commonly used in many fields, including ethology. Composite scores can simplify the analysis and interpretation of data while capturing the salient features of the underlying latent variable(s) approximated by the score. Here we outline four approaches for constructing composite scores in ethological studies: ad hoc (AH) assignment, discriminant analysis (DA), principal components analysis (PCA), and partial least squares (PLS). We give examples of each using previously published data from a study of responses of lone star ticks (<i>Amblyomma americanum</i>) to several deterrent phytochemicals. In most cases, researchers construct AH composite scores by subjectively assigning weights and signs to the behavioral components; unity weighting constrains weights to −1 or 1 on standardized variables. Because the weights and signs of the coefficients are subjectively assigned, AH scores may generate a spurious result. DA can be used to construct composite behavioral scores when there are clearly defined treatments or preference tests using distinct stimuli. The DA score created consists of orthogonal variables that capture the variability in the behavioral measures most closely aligned with the differences among treatment or stimuli variables. This approach assumes that subjects discriminate treatment or stimuli differences, but may not manifest clear overt behavior that they are able to do so; it reduces dimensionality, usually to a single axis, representing the underlying latent variable of interest. The PCA approach is similar to DA except that the composite score is created independently of treatment or stimuli variables. Thus, this method can be used to investigate possible relationships between a composite score and any relevant independent variable, perhaps measured asynchronously with the behaviors. PLS is a multivariate method related to DA and PCA and is also used to create latent orthogonal variables. However, these new variables are constructed to maximize correlation with one or more <i>continuous</i> independent variables. Creation of a composite score requires the researcher to consider not only the method used to create it, but, at an earlier stage in the research, which behaviors should be components and how best to measure them.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":1,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":16.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/eth.13382\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/eth.13382","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

综合分数是将两种或两种以上的测量结果结合起来,在许多领域都很常用,包括动物行为学。综合分数可以简化数据的分析和解释,同时捕捉到由分数近似的潜在变量的显著特征。在这里,我们概述了在行为学研究中构建复合分数的四种方法:特设(AH)分配,判别分析(DA),主成分分析(PCA)和偏最小二乘(PLS)。我们使用先前发表的一项关于孤星蜱(Amblyomma americanum)对几种威慑植物化学物质的反应的研究数据给出了每个例子。在大多数情况下,研究人员通过主观地为行为成分分配权重和符号来构建AH综合分数;统一加权将标准化变量的权重限制为−1或1。由于系数的权重和符号是主观分配的,因此AH分数可能产生虚假的结果。当有明确定义的治疗或使用不同刺激的偏好测试时,数据分析可用于构建复合行为评分。创建的DA评分由正交变量组成,这些变量捕获了与治疗或刺激变量之间的差异最密切相关的行为测量中的可变性。这种方法假设受试者区分对待或刺激的差异,但可能不会表现出明确的公开行为,表明他们能够这样做;它将维度降低,通常为单个轴,表示感兴趣的潜在变量。PCA方法类似于DA,除了复合评分是独立于治疗或刺激变量创建的。因此,此方法可用于调查复合分数与任何相关自变量之间的可能关系,这些自变量可能与行为异步测量。PLS是一种与DA和PCA相关的多变量方法,也用于创建潜在正交变量。然而,这些新变量的构造是为了最大化与一个或多个连续自变量的相关性。创建一个综合分数不仅需要研究人员考虑用于创建它的方法,而且在研究的早期阶段,哪些行为应该是组成部分,以及如何最好地衡量它们。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Constructing composite scores for contemporaneous behaviors: A comparison of four approaches

Constructing composite scores for contemporaneous behaviors: A comparison of four approaches

Composite scores, where the results of two or more measures are combined, are commonly used in many fields, including ethology. Composite scores can simplify the analysis and interpretation of data while capturing the salient features of the underlying latent variable(s) approximated by the score. Here we outline four approaches for constructing composite scores in ethological studies: ad hoc (AH) assignment, discriminant analysis (DA), principal components analysis (PCA), and partial least squares (PLS). We give examples of each using previously published data from a study of responses of lone star ticks (Amblyomma americanum) to several deterrent phytochemicals. In most cases, researchers construct AH composite scores by subjectively assigning weights and signs to the behavioral components; unity weighting constrains weights to −1 or 1 on standardized variables. Because the weights and signs of the coefficients are subjectively assigned, AH scores may generate a spurious result. DA can be used to construct composite behavioral scores when there are clearly defined treatments or preference tests using distinct stimuli. The DA score created consists of orthogonal variables that capture the variability in the behavioral measures most closely aligned with the differences among treatment or stimuli variables. This approach assumes that subjects discriminate treatment or stimuli differences, but may not manifest clear overt behavior that they are able to do so; it reduces dimensionality, usually to a single axis, representing the underlying latent variable of interest. The PCA approach is similar to DA except that the composite score is created independently of treatment or stimuli variables. Thus, this method can be used to investigate possible relationships between a composite score and any relevant independent variable, perhaps measured asynchronously with the behaviors. PLS is a multivariate method related to DA and PCA and is also used to create latent orthogonal variables. However, these new variables are constructed to maximize correlation with one or more continuous independent variables. Creation of a composite score requires the researcher to consider not only the method used to create it, but, at an earlier stage in the research, which behaviors should be components and how best to measure them.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Accounts of Chemical Research
Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
31.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
312
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信