{"title":"对皮埃尔·乌赞“超量子关联”的充分澄清:一个必要的澄清","authors":"N. Courtemanche, C. Crépeau","doi":"10.4236/jqis.2021.112005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the paper “Super-Quantum Correlations: A Necessary Clarification” by Uzan [1], it is suggested that stronger than quantum (or supra-quantum) correlations are not possible. The main point of Uzan’s argumentation is the belief that the intuitive definition of No-Signalling (NS) is different from the statistical definition of No-Signalling (NSstat), and that situations exist where NSstat is respected while NS isn’t. In this paper we show why these definitions are one and the same, and where the example from the original paper breaks down. We provide a broader context to help the reader understand intuitively the situation.","PeriodicalId":58996,"journal":{"name":"量子信息科学期刊(英文)","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Sufficient Clarification of “Super-Quantum Correlations: A Necessary Clarification” by Pierre Uzan\",\"authors\":\"N. Courtemanche, C. Crépeau\",\"doi\":\"10.4236/jqis.2021.112005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In the paper “Super-Quantum Correlations: A Necessary Clarification” by Uzan [1], it is suggested that stronger than quantum (or supra-quantum) correlations are not possible. The main point of Uzan’s argumentation is the belief that the intuitive definition of No-Signalling (NS) is different from the statistical definition of No-Signalling (NSstat), and that situations exist where NSstat is respected while NS isn’t. In this paper we show why these definitions are one and the same, and where the example from the original paper breaks down. We provide a broader context to help the reader understand intuitively the situation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":58996,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"量子信息科学期刊(英文)\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"量子信息科学期刊(英文)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1089\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4236/jqis.2021.112005\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"量子信息科学期刊(英文)","FirstCategoryId":"1089","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4236/jqis.2021.112005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
A Sufficient Clarification of “Super-Quantum Correlations: A Necessary Clarification” by Pierre Uzan
In the paper “Super-Quantum Correlations: A Necessary Clarification” by Uzan [1], it is suggested that stronger than quantum (or supra-quantum) correlations are not possible. The main point of Uzan’s argumentation is the belief that the intuitive definition of No-Signalling (NS) is different from the statistical definition of No-Signalling (NSstat), and that situations exist where NSstat is respected while NS isn’t. In this paper we show why these definitions are one and the same, and where the example from the original paper breaks down. We provide a broader context to help the reader understand intuitively the situation.