建立处理优先级:来自2017年美国知识库实践研究的建议

Q3 Social Sciences

Journal of Archival Organization Pub Date : 2018-04-03 DOI:10.1080/15332748.2019.1609309

Amy Cooper Cary, Pam Hackbart-Dean

{"title":"建立处理优先级:来自2017年美国知识库实践研究的建议","authors":"Amy Cooper Cary, Pam Hackbart-Dean","doi":"10.1080/15332748.2019.1609309","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Building upon archival scholarship and previous solutions addressing backlog collections, this study seeks to identify a comprehensive, integrated, and effective strategy to establish and maintain processing priorities. This study is based on supporting research, which includes the results of a survey of archivists and the findings of five focus group discussions about processing priorities. Using these findings, the authors (a) consider whether this focus on an old problem has motivated archivists to find innovative solutions; (b) determine whether archivists are using these tools; (c) consider whether and how archivists have changed processing priority practices and policies; and (d) seek to clarify current metrics to establish overall processing priorities.","PeriodicalId":35382,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Archival Organization","volume":"15 1","pages":"34 - 57"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/15332748.2019.1609309","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Establishing Processing Priorities: Recommendations from a 2017 Study of Practices in US Repositories\",\"authors\":\"Amy Cooper Cary, Pam Hackbart-Dean\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/15332748.2019.1609309\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Building upon archival scholarship and previous solutions addressing backlog collections, this study seeks to identify a comprehensive, integrated, and effective strategy to establish and maintain processing priorities. This study is based on supporting research, which includes the results of a survey of archivists and the findings of five focus group discussions about processing priorities. Using these findings, the authors (a) consider whether this focus on an old problem has motivated archivists to find innovative solutions; (b) determine whether archivists are using these tools; (c) consider whether and how archivists have changed processing priority practices and policies; and (d) seek to clarify current metrics to establish overall processing priorities.\",\"PeriodicalId\":35382,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Archival Organization\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"34 - 57\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-04-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/15332748.2019.1609309\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Archival Organization\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/15332748.2019.1609309\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Archival Organization","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15332748.2019.1609309","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:本研究以档案学术研究和先前解决积压藏品的解决方案为基础，旨在确定一种全面、综合和有效的策略，以建立和维持处理优先级。这项研究基于支持性研究，其中包括对档案管理员的调查结果和五个关于处理优先级的焦点小组讨论的结果。利用这些发现，作者(a)考虑对老问题的关注是否促使档案工作者寻找创新的解决方案;(b)确定档案管理员是否正在使用这些工具;(c)考虑档案管理员是否以及如何改变处理优先的做法和政策;(d)寻求澄清当前的指标，以确定总体处理优先级。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Establishing Processing Priorities: Recommendations from a 2017 Study of Practices in US Repositories

Abstract Building upon archival scholarship and previous solutions addressing backlog collections, this study seeks to identify a comprehensive, integrated, and effective strategy to establish and maintain processing priorities. This study is based on supporting research, which includes the results of a survey of archivists and the findings of five focus group discussions about processing priorities. Using these findings, the authors (a) consider whether this focus on an old problem has motivated archivists to find innovative solutions; (b) determine whether archivists are using these tools; (c) consider whether and how archivists have changed processing priority practices and policies; and (d) seek to clarify current metrics to establish overall processing priorities.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Journal of Archival Organization Social Sciences-Library and Information Sciences

CiteScore

0.60

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： The Journal of Archival Organization is an international journal encompassing all aspects of the arrangement, description, and provision of access to all forms of archival materials. Articles on processing techniques and procedures, preparation of finding aids, and cataloging of archival and manuscript collections in accordance with MARC, AACR2, and other rules, standards, and cataloging conventions are only part of what you"ll find in this refereed/peer-reviewed publication. The journal places emphasis on emerging technologies, applications, and standards that range from Encoded Archival Description (EAD) and methods of organizing archival collections for access on the World Wide Web to issues connected with the digitization and display of archival materials.