合格的地中海连通性:拜占庭和七世纪的法兰克人

IF 0.7 1区 历史学 0 MEDIEVAL & RENAISSANCE STUDIES
Mischa Meier, Steffen Patzold
{"title":"合格的地中海连通性:拜占庭和七世纪的法兰克人","authors":"Mischa Meier,&nbsp;Steffen Patzold","doi":"10.1111/emed.12644","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In the last two decades, historians researching the seventh century <span>ce</span> have increasingly emphasized mobility, communications and connectivity across the Mediterranean world that supposedly included close contacts between the Franks and Byzantium. These studies, however, rely often on optimistic, maximum interpretations of the comparatively sparse source base, and have not always precisely distinguished between different forms of mobility and connectivity. This article argues that a closer examination of the actual cultural and political consequences of mobility and contact between Byzantium and Gaul is required, and that the possibility of discontinuity and disintegration should not be disregarded. In our reading of the sources, we deliberately adopt a sceptical, methodologically cautious minimal position: the textual sources can be interpreted as showing that, while individual, sporadic contacts across the Mediterranean continued to exist, there was no established, continuous practice of communications between Byzantium and Gaul.</p>","PeriodicalId":44508,"journal":{"name":"Early Medieval Europe","volume":"31 3","pages":"380-404"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/emed.12644","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Qualifying Mediterranean connectivity: Byzantium and the Franks during the seventh century\",\"authors\":\"Mischa Meier,&nbsp;Steffen Patzold\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/emed.12644\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>In the last two decades, historians researching the seventh century <span>ce</span> have increasingly emphasized mobility, communications and connectivity across the Mediterranean world that supposedly included close contacts between the Franks and Byzantium. These studies, however, rely often on optimistic, maximum interpretations of the comparatively sparse source base, and have not always precisely distinguished between different forms of mobility and connectivity. This article argues that a closer examination of the actual cultural and political consequences of mobility and contact between Byzantium and Gaul is required, and that the possibility of discontinuity and disintegration should not be disregarded. In our reading of the sources, we deliberately adopt a sceptical, methodologically cautious minimal position: the textual sources can be interpreted as showing that, while individual, sporadic contacts across the Mediterranean continued to exist, there was no established, continuous practice of communications between Byzantium and Gaul.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":44508,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Early Medieval Europe\",\"volume\":\"31 3\",\"pages\":\"380-404\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/emed.12644\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Early Medieval Europe\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/emed.12644\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDIEVAL & RENAISSANCE STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Early Medieval Europe","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/emed.12644","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"MEDIEVAL & RENAISSANCE STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在过去的二十年里,研究公元七世纪的历史学家越来越强调地中海世界的流动性、通信和连通性,据说其中包括法兰克人和拜占庭人之间的密切联系。然而,这些研究往往依赖于对相对稀疏的源基础的乐观、最大化的解释,并且并不总是准确区分不同形式的流动性和连通性。本文认为,需要更仔细地研究拜占庭和高卢之间流动和接触的实际文化和政治后果,不应忽视不连续和解体的可能性。在阅读这些来源时,我们故意采取了一种怀疑的、方法上谨慎的最低立场:文本来源可以被解释为表明,尽管地中海各地仍存在个别的、零星的接触,但拜占庭和高卢之间并没有建立起持续的沟通实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Qualifying Mediterranean connectivity: Byzantium and the Franks during the seventh century

In the last two decades, historians researching the seventh century ce have increasingly emphasized mobility, communications and connectivity across the Mediterranean world that supposedly included close contacts between the Franks and Byzantium. These studies, however, rely often on optimistic, maximum interpretations of the comparatively sparse source base, and have not always precisely distinguished between different forms of mobility and connectivity. This article argues that a closer examination of the actual cultural and political consequences of mobility and contact between Byzantium and Gaul is required, and that the possibility of discontinuity and disintegration should not be disregarded. In our reading of the sources, we deliberately adopt a sceptical, methodologically cautious minimal position: the textual sources can be interpreted as showing that, while individual, sporadic contacts across the Mediterranean continued to exist, there was no established, continuous practice of communications between Byzantium and Gaul.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Early Medieval Europe
Early Medieval Europe MEDIEVAL & RENAISSANCE STUDIES-
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
16.70%
发文量
75
期刊介绍: Early Medieval Europe provides an indispensable source of information and debate on the history of Europe from the later Roman Empire to the eleventh century. The journal is a thoroughly interdisciplinary forum, encouraging the discussion of archaeology, numismatics, palaeography, diplomatic, literature, onomastics, art history, linguistics and epigraphy, as well as more traditional historical approaches. It covers Europe in its entirety, including material on Iceland, Ireland, the British Isles, Scandinavia and Continental Europe (both west and east).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信