关于现代政党的本土和学术概念。关于阿根廷社会党研究的思考

Q4 Arts and Humanities
Gonzalo Ezequiel Cabezas
{"title":"关于现代政党的本土和学术概念。关于阿根廷社会党研究的思考","authors":"Gonzalo Ezequiel Cabezas","doi":"10.35305/PROHISTORIA.VI.1239","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"espanolEste articulo analiza concepciones nativas y academicas sobre los partidos politicos modernos en Argentina. Por un lado, rastreamos las caracteristicas que segun la vision de los dirigentes socialistas de comienzos de siglo XX debia tener un partido para ser considerado moderno. Por otro, observamos como importantes figuras del campo academico, desde su pertenencia politica socialista, construyeron una mirada normativa de los partidos modernos que guardo ciertas similitudes con la concepcion nativa. Por ultimo, recuperamos los estudios sobre las practicas politicas como via para repensar la politica desde sus formas concretas y no desde visiones prescriptivas cuyos supuestos no se explicitan. EnglishThis article analyzes native and academic conceptions about modern political parties in Argentina. On one hand, we trace the characteristics that according the vision of the socialist leaders from the beginnings of the twentieth century had to have a party to be considered modern. On the other hand, we observe how important figures of the academic field, from their socialist political background, constructed a normative view of the modern parties that was similar to the native conception. Finally, we retrieve the studies about political practices as a way to rethink politics from concrete experiences rather than from prescriptive visions which assumptions are not explicit.","PeriodicalId":21160,"journal":{"name":"Prohistoria","volume":"26 1","pages":"53-75"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Concepciones nativas y académicas sobre los partidos políticos modernos. Reflexiones en torno al estudio del Partido Socialista argentino\",\"authors\":\"Gonzalo Ezequiel Cabezas\",\"doi\":\"10.35305/PROHISTORIA.VI.1239\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"espanolEste articulo analiza concepciones nativas y academicas sobre los partidos politicos modernos en Argentina. Por un lado, rastreamos las caracteristicas que segun la vision de los dirigentes socialistas de comienzos de siglo XX debia tener un partido para ser considerado moderno. Por otro, observamos como importantes figuras del campo academico, desde su pertenencia politica socialista, construyeron una mirada normativa de los partidos modernos que guardo ciertas similitudes con la concepcion nativa. Por ultimo, recuperamos los estudios sobre las practicas politicas como via para repensar la politica desde sus formas concretas y no desde visiones prescriptivas cuyos supuestos no se explicitan. EnglishThis article analyzes native and academic conceptions about modern political parties in Argentina. On one hand, we trace the characteristics that according the vision of the socialist leaders from the beginnings of the twentieth century had to have a party to be considered modern. On the other hand, we observe how important figures of the academic field, from their socialist political background, constructed a normative view of the modern parties that was similar to the native conception. Finally, we retrieve the studies about political practices as a way to rethink politics from concrete experiences rather than from prescriptive visions which assumptions are not explicit.\",\"PeriodicalId\":21160,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Prohistoria\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"53-75\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-11-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Prohistoria\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.35305/PROHISTORIA.VI.1239\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prohistoria","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35305/PROHISTORIA.VI.1239","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文分析了阿根廷现代政党的本土和学术概念。一方面,根据20世纪初社会主义领导人的观点,我们追踪了一个政党要被认为是现代政党的特征。另一方面,我们观察到学术界的重要人物,从他们的社会主义政治归属来看,他们对现代政党的规范性看法与本土观念有一定的相似之处。最后,我们恢复了对政治实践的研究,作为从其具体形式而不是从假设不明确的规定性观点重新思考政治的途径。这篇文章分析了阿根廷关于现代政党的本土和学术概念。一方面,我们追踪了根据社会主义领导人自20世纪初以来的愿景,政党必须被视为现代政党的特征。另一方面,我们观察到学术界的重要人物,从他们的社会主义政治背景来看,是如何建立起与本土概念相似的现代政党规范观的。最后,我们将关于政治实践的研究作为一种从具体经验而不是从假设不明确的规定性愿景中重新思考政治的方式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Concepciones nativas y académicas sobre los partidos políticos modernos. Reflexiones en torno al estudio del Partido Socialista argentino
espanolEste articulo analiza concepciones nativas y academicas sobre los partidos politicos modernos en Argentina. Por un lado, rastreamos las caracteristicas que segun la vision de los dirigentes socialistas de comienzos de siglo XX debia tener un partido para ser considerado moderno. Por otro, observamos como importantes figuras del campo academico, desde su pertenencia politica socialista, construyeron una mirada normativa de los partidos modernos que guardo ciertas similitudes con la concepcion nativa. Por ultimo, recuperamos los estudios sobre las practicas politicas como via para repensar la politica desde sus formas concretas y no desde visiones prescriptivas cuyos supuestos no se explicitan. EnglishThis article analyzes native and academic conceptions about modern political parties in Argentina. On one hand, we trace the characteristics that according the vision of the socialist leaders from the beginnings of the twentieth century had to have a party to be considered modern. On the other hand, we observe how important figures of the academic field, from their socialist political background, constructed a normative view of the modern parties that was similar to the native conception. Finally, we retrieve the studies about political practices as a way to rethink politics from concrete experiences rather than from prescriptive visions which assumptions are not explicit.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信