当新闻是危机:半岛电视台和阿拉伯电视台对2017年海湾冲突的框架

IF 1.5 Q2 COMMUNICATION

Global Media and Communication Pub Date : 2020-06-19 DOI:10.1177/1742766520921880

Soukaina Ajaoud, M. Elmasry

{"title":"当新闻是危机:半岛电视台和阿拉伯电视台对2017年海湾冲突的框架","authors":"Soukaina Ajaoud, M. Elmasry","doi":"10.1177/1742766520921880","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The 2017 Gulf crisis raises important questions about what happens when news networks become part and parcel of a political conflict. This research employs content analysis to analyse how two flagship evening news programmes – Al-Hasad (The Harvest) on Al Jazeera and Panorama on Al Arabiya – framed the early phase of the 2017 Gulf crisis. The study provides an elucidation of how, specifically, editorial positions were made manifest and, importantly, what framing mechanisms were employed. Results suggest that Al Jazeera’s Al-Hasad took the position of a victim being attacked by an external oppressor, while Al Arabiya’s Panorama framed Qatar as a sponsor of terrorism.","PeriodicalId":45157,"journal":{"name":"Global Media and Communication","volume":"16 1","pages":"227 - 242"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1742766520921880","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"When news is the crisis: Al Jazeera and Al Arabiya framing of the 2017 Gulf conflict\",\"authors\":\"Soukaina Ajaoud, M. Elmasry\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/1742766520921880\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The 2017 Gulf crisis raises important questions about what happens when news networks become part and parcel of a political conflict. This research employs content analysis to analyse how two flagship evening news programmes – Al-Hasad (The Harvest) on Al Jazeera and Panorama on Al Arabiya – framed the early phase of the 2017 Gulf crisis. The study provides an elucidation of how, specifically, editorial positions were made manifest and, importantly, what framing mechanisms were employed. Results suggest that Al Jazeera’s Al-Hasad took the position of a victim being attacked by an external oppressor, while Al Arabiya’s Panorama framed Qatar as a sponsor of terrorism.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45157,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global Media and Communication\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"227 - 242\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-06-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1742766520921880\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global Media and Communication\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/1742766520921880\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"COMMUNICATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Media and Communication","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1742766520921880","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 6

摘要

2017年海湾危机引发了一个重要问题，即当新闻网络成为政治冲突的一部分时会发生什么。这项研究采用内容分析来分析两个旗舰晚间新闻节目—— Al Hasad （The Harvest）在半岛电视台和全景关于阿拉伯半岛——勾勒出2017年海湾危机的早期阶段。这项研究具体说明了编辑立场是如何表现出来的，重要的是，说明了采用了什么框架机制。结果表明，半岛电视台 Al Hasad 采取了被外部压迫者攻击的受害者的立场，而阿拉伯的全景诬陷卡塔尔为恐怖主义赞助者。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

When news is the crisis: Al Jazeera and Al Arabiya framing of the 2017 Gulf conflict

The 2017 Gulf crisis raises important questions about what happens when news networks become part and parcel of a political conflict. This research employs content analysis to analyse how two flagship evening news programmes – Al-Hasad (The Harvest) on Al Jazeera and Panorama on Al Arabiya – framed the early phase of the 2017 Gulf crisis. The study provides an elucidation of how, specifically, editorial positions were made manifest and, importantly, what framing mechanisms were employed. Results suggest that Al Jazeera’s Al-Hasad took the position of a victim being attacked by an external oppressor, while Al Arabiya’s Panorama framed Qatar as a sponsor of terrorism.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Global Media and Communication COMMUNICATION-

CiteScore

2.50

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Global Media and Communication is an international peer-reviewed journal launched in April 2005 as a key forum for articulating critical debates and developments in the continuously changing global media and communications environment. As a pioneering platform for the exchange of ideas and multiple perspectives, the journal addresses fresh and contentious research agendas and promotes an academic dialogue that is fully transnational and transdisciplinary in its scope. With a network of ten regional editors around the world, the journal offers a global source of material on international media and cultural processes. Special features include interviews, reviews of recent media developments and digests of policy documents and data reports from a variety of countries.