Spenser的Panthea和Lucian的:Elizabeth、Gloriana和The Faerie Queene的Encomium协议

IF 0.6 2区 文学 0 LITERATURE, BRITISH ISLES
Kenneth Borris
{"title":"Spenser的Panthea和Lucian的:Elizabeth、Gloriana和The Faerie Queene的Encomium协议","authors":"Kenneth Borris","doi":"10.1086/709865","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Spenser and his friend Gabriel Harvey enjoyed reading Lucian, and at that time this ancient writer’s two dialogues celebrating Panthea were prominent exemplars of encomium for an exalted woman. Although the name Panthea also appears in The Faerie Queene, explicitly linked with Cleopolis and Gloriana, its Lucianic implications there have been hitherto unnoticed. Spenser thereby strategically invites comparison of his epic’s panegyrical enterprise with Lucian’s in those dialogues, as well as with their assessments of appropriate encomiastic expression that avoids mere flattery. Hence The Faerie Queene incorporates means of evaluating its own celebratory project, limits its praise of Elizabeth I, and ensures that its homage to her is definitively provisional. This new perspective on Spenser’s major text clarifies the significance of its fundamental conceit, Elizabeth’s idealization as Gloriana, illuminates the distinction between these two queens, and confirms the advisory and critical functions of Spenserian encomium. So as to ensure that England’s Queen remains open to instructive critique and that his own depiction of faery’s indicates a far higher standard, the poet significantly distances his actual Queen from her “true glorious type” manifested in Gloriana (I.pr.4). [K.B.]","PeriodicalId":44199,"journal":{"name":"ENGLISH LITERARY RENAISSANCE","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1086/709865","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Spenser’s Panthea and Lucian’s: Elizabeth, Gloriana, and The Faerie Queene’s Protocols of Encomium\",\"authors\":\"Kenneth Borris\",\"doi\":\"10.1086/709865\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Spenser and his friend Gabriel Harvey enjoyed reading Lucian, and at that time this ancient writer’s two dialogues celebrating Panthea were prominent exemplars of encomium for an exalted woman. Although the name Panthea also appears in The Faerie Queene, explicitly linked with Cleopolis and Gloriana, its Lucianic implications there have been hitherto unnoticed. Spenser thereby strategically invites comparison of his epic’s panegyrical enterprise with Lucian’s in those dialogues, as well as with their assessments of appropriate encomiastic expression that avoids mere flattery. Hence The Faerie Queene incorporates means of evaluating its own celebratory project, limits its praise of Elizabeth I, and ensures that its homage to her is definitively provisional. This new perspective on Spenser’s major text clarifies the significance of its fundamental conceit, Elizabeth’s idealization as Gloriana, illuminates the distinction between these two queens, and confirms the advisory and critical functions of Spenserian encomium. So as to ensure that England’s Queen remains open to instructive critique and that his own depiction of faery’s indicates a far higher standard, the poet significantly distances his actual Queen from her “true glorious type” manifested in Gloriana (I.pr.4). [K.B.]\",\"PeriodicalId\":44199,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ENGLISH LITERARY RENAISSANCE\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-08-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1086/709865\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ENGLISH LITERARY RENAISSANCE\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1086/709865\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LITERATURE, BRITISH ISLES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ENGLISH LITERARY RENAISSANCE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/709865","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE, BRITISH ISLES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

斯宾塞和他的朋友加布里埃尔·哈维喜欢读《卢西恩》,当时这位古代作家为庆祝《万神殿》而写的两段对话是对一位崇高女性的赞美。尽管Panthea这个名字也出现在《精灵奎恩》中,明确地与克利奥波利斯和格洛里亚娜联系在一起,但它在那里的Lucianic含义迄今尚未被注意到。因此,斯宾塞在这些对话中战略性地邀请人们将他的史诗般的史诗般的事业与卢西恩的事业进行比较,并与他们对避免仅仅是奉承的恰当鼓励性表达的评估进行比较。因此,The Faerie Queene采用了评估自己的庆祝项目的方法,限制了对伊丽莎白一世的赞扬,并确保对她的致敬是暂时的。这种对斯宾塞主要文本的新视角阐明了其基本自负的意义,即伊丽莎白理想化为格洛丽亚娜,阐明了这两位女王之间的区别,并证实了斯宾塞赞美诗的咨询和批评功能。为了确保英国女王仍然接受有启发性的批评,以及他自己对精灵的描绘表明了一个更高的标准,这位诗人将他真正的女王与她在《格洛丽亚娜》(I.pr.4)中表现出的“真正的光辉类型”拉开了很大的距离。[K.B.]
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Spenser’s Panthea and Lucian’s: Elizabeth, Gloriana, and The Faerie Queene’s Protocols of Encomium
Spenser and his friend Gabriel Harvey enjoyed reading Lucian, and at that time this ancient writer’s two dialogues celebrating Panthea were prominent exemplars of encomium for an exalted woman. Although the name Panthea also appears in The Faerie Queene, explicitly linked with Cleopolis and Gloriana, its Lucianic implications there have been hitherto unnoticed. Spenser thereby strategically invites comparison of his epic’s panegyrical enterprise with Lucian’s in those dialogues, as well as with their assessments of appropriate encomiastic expression that avoids mere flattery. Hence The Faerie Queene incorporates means of evaluating its own celebratory project, limits its praise of Elizabeth I, and ensures that its homage to her is definitively provisional. This new perspective on Spenser’s major text clarifies the significance of its fundamental conceit, Elizabeth’s idealization as Gloriana, illuminates the distinction between these two queens, and confirms the advisory and critical functions of Spenserian encomium. So as to ensure that England’s Queen remains open to instructive critique and that his own depiction of faery’s indicates a far higher standard, the poet significantly distances his actual Queen from her “true glorious type” manifested in Gloriana (I.pr.4). [K.B.]
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
28
期刊介绍: English Literary Renaissance is a journal devoted to current criticism and scholarship of Tudor and early Stuart English literature, 1485-1665, including Shakespeare, Spenser, Donne, and Milton. It is unique in featuring the publication of rare texts and newly discovered manuscripts of the period and current annotated bibliographies of work in the field. It is illustrated with contemporary woodcuts and engravings of Renaissance England and Europe.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信