马尔杜克与YHWH的存在与缺失

IF 0.1 3区 哲学 0 RELIGION
Inchol Yang
{"title":"马尔杜克与YHWH的存在与缺失","authors":"Inchol Yang","doi":"10.1080/09018328.2021.1976517","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT In the inscription of the Assyrian King Esarhaddon (680-669 BCE), the Babylonian god Marduk voluntarily left his city Babylon because of his fury at the iniquities of his people. It is Marduk’s fury that caused the devastation of Babylon. In fact, Esarhaddon’s father, Sennacherib destroyed Babylon and usurped the statue of Marduk to his capital Assur in 689 BCE. After the death of Sennacherib, his youngest son Esarhaddon not only planned to rebuild the temple of Babylon, Esagila, but also to return Marduk to Babylon. His rebuilding project suggests that Marduk changed his mind and decided to return Babylon. This sequence resembles Ezekiel’s theological structure of the divine presence and absence. Although previous studies of the Esarhaddon inscription shed light on the understanding of the theological background of Ezekiel’s literary structure, they overlooked the fact that Ezekiel uses hidden transcripts, the concept which James C. Scott introduced, to resist the Babylonian Empire.","PeriodicalId":42456,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of the Old Testament","volume":"35 1","pages":"187 - 200"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Presence and Absence of Marduk and YHWH\",\"authors\":\"Inchol Yang\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/09018328.2021.1976517\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT In the inscription of the Assyrian King Esarhaddon (680-669 BCE), the Babylonian god Marduk voluntarily left his city Babylon because of his fury at the iniquities of his people. It is Marduk’s fury that caused the devastation of Babylon. In fact, Esarhaddon’s father, Sennacherib destroyed Babylon and usurped the statue of Marduk to his capital Assur in 689 BCE. After the death of Sennacherib, his youngest son Esarhaddon not only planned to rebuild the temple of Babylon, Esagila, but also to return Marduk to Babylon. His rebuilding project suggests that Marduk changed his mind and decided to return Babylon. This sequence resembles Ezekiel’s theological structure of the divine presence and absence. Although previous studies of the Esarhaddon inscription shed light on the understanding of the theological background of Ezekiel’s literary structure, they overlooked the fact that Ezekiel uses hidden transcripts, the concept which James C. Scott introduced, to resist the Babylonian Empire.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42456,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scandinavian Journal of the Old Testament\",\"volume\":\"35 1\",\"pages\":\"187 - 200\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scandinavian Journal of the Old Testament\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/09018328.2021.1976517\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"RELIGION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of the Old Testament","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09018328.2021.1976517","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要在亚述国王埃萨哈登(公元前680年至公元前669年)的铭文中,巴比伦神马尔杜克因对人民的罪孽感到愤怒而自愿离开了他的城市巴比伦。正是马尔杜克的愤怒造成了巴比伦的毁灭。事实上,Esarhaddon的父亲Sennacherib在公元前689年摧毁了巴比伦,并篡夺了马尔杜克的雕像。Sennacherib死后,他的小儿子Esarhaddon不仅计划重建巴比伦神庙Esagila,还计划将Marduk归还巴比伦。他的重建计划表明马尔杜克改变了主意,决定归还巴比伦。这个序列类似于以西结关于神的存在和不存在的神学结构。尽管先前对埃萨哈登铭文的研究揭示了对以西结文学结构的神学背景的理解,但他们忽略了这样一个事实,即以西结使用隐藏的抄本,即詹姆斯·C·斯科特引入的概念,来抵抗巴比伦帝国。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Presence and Absence of Marduk and YHWH
ABSTRACT In the inscription of the Assyrian King Esarhaddon (680-669 BCE), the Babylonian god Marduk voluntarily left his city Babylon because of his fury at the iniquities of his people. It is Marduk’s fury that caused the devastation of Babylon. In fact, Esarhaddon’s father, Sennacherib destroyed Babylon and usurped the statue of Marduk to his capital Assur in 689 BCE. After the death of Sennacherib, his youngest son Esarhaddon not only planned to rebuild the temple of Babylon, Esagila, but also to return Marduk to Babylon. His rebuilding project suggests that Marduk changed his mind and decided to return Babylon. This sequence resembles Ezekiel’s theological structure of the divine presence and absence. Although previous studies of the Esarhaddon inscription shed light on the understanding of the theological background of Ezekiel’s literary structure, they overlooked the fact that Ezekiel uses hidden transcripts, the concept which James C. Scott introduced, to resist the Babylonian Empire.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
50.00%
发文量
21
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信