公用事业、企业还是社区?达卡水和卫生部门改革的领土政治经济

IF 2 2区 经济学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Andri Heidler, S. K. Luies, Abul Kamal, Mahbub Ul-Alam, C. Lüthi, O. Crevoisier
{"title":"公用事业、企业还是社区?达卡水和卫生部门改革的领土政治经济","authors":"Andri Heidler, S. K. Luies, Abul Kamal, Mahbub Ul-Alam, C. Lüthi, O. Crevoisier","doi":"10.1177/09562478221149915","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Citywide inclusive sanitation (CWIS) is becoming the dominant paradigm for achieving safe sanitation for all by 2030. Its technical benefits have been explored, but the bargaining over financial and organizational changes CWIS entails have not yet been adequately addressed. Our case study explains the stalled rollout of CWIS in Dhaka, Bangladesh. We analyse policy pathways over the past 30 years through a combined territorial political economy and power perspective to understand their effects on equality. We highlight how donors link the introduction of CWIS to the organization of sanitation through a market; how the utility uses CWIS as an opportunity to avoid costly responsibilities in non-sewered sanitation; and how service co-production through community-based solutions is neglected. CWIS has successfully overcome the dogmatic technological focus in the sanitation system, but for citywide sanitation to be scaled inclusively, the dogmatic focus in the organization and financing of the sanitation sector must also be overcome.","PeriodicalId":48038,"journal":{"name":"Environment and Urbanization","volume":"35 1","pages":"156 - 177"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"On whose terms: utilities, enterprises or communities? The territorial political economy of water and sanitation sector reforms in Dhaka\",\"authors\":\"Andri Heidler, S. K. Luies, Abul Kamal, Mahbub Ul-Alam, C. Lüthi, O. Crevoisier\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/09562478221149915\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Citywide inclusive sanitation (CWIS) is becoming the dominant paradigm for achieving safe sanitation for all by 2030. Its technical benefits have been explored, but the bargaining over financial and organizational changes CWIS entails have not yet been adequately addressed. Our case study explains the stalled rollout of CWIS in Dhaka, Bangladesh. We analyse policy pathways over the past 30 years through a combined territorial political economy and power perspective to understand their effects on equality. We highlight how donors link the introduction of CWIS to the organization of sanitation through a market; how the utility uses CWIS as an opportunity to avoid costly responsibilities in non-sewered sanitation; and how service co-production through community-based solutions is neglected. CWIS has successfully overcome the dogmatic technological focus in the sanitation system, but for citywide sanitation to be scaled inclusively, the dogmatic focus in the organization and financing of the sanitation sector must also be overcome.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48038,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environment and Urbanization\",\"volume\":\"35 1\",\"pages\":\"156 - 177\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environment and Urbanization\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/09562478221149915\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environment and Urbanization","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09562478221149915","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

全市包容性卫生(CWIS)正在成为到2030年实现人人享有安全卫生设施的主要范例。它在技术上的好处已经被探索过了,但是在财务和组织方面的变化还没有得到充分的解决。我们的案例研究解释了在孟加拉国达卡推行CWIS的停滞。我们通过结合地域政治经济学和权力视角分析了过去30年的政策路径,以了解它们对平等的影响。我们强调捐助方如何通过市场将国家卫生信息系统的引入与卫生组织联系起来;公用事业如何利用CWIS作为一个机会,避免在无下水道卫生设施方面承担昂贵的责任;以及如何通过基于社区的解决方案进行服务合作生产被忽视。CWIS已经成功地克服了卫生系统中教条的技术重点,但要在全市范围内扩大卫生设施,还必须克服卫生部门在组织和融资方面的教条重点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
On whose terms: utilities, enterprises or communities? The territorial political economy of water and sanitation sector reforms in Dhaka
Citywide inclusive sanitation (CWIS) is becoming the dominant paradigm for achieving safe sanitation for all by 2030. Its technical benefits have been explored, but the bargaining over financial and organizational changes CWIS entails have not yet been adequately addressed. Our case study explains the stalled rollout of CWIS in Dhaka, Bangladesh. We analyse policy pathways over the past 30 years through a combined territorial political economy and power perspective to understand their effects on equality. We highlight how donors link the introduction of CWIS to the organization of sanitation through a market; how the utility uses CWIS as an opportunity to avoid costly responsibilities in non-sewered sanitation; and how service co-production through community-based solutions is neglected. CWIS has successfully overcome the dogmatic technological focus in the sanitation system, but for citywide sanitation to be scaled inclusively, the dogmatic focus in the organization and financing of the sanitation sector must also be overcome.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
2.70%
发文量
32
期刊介绍: Environment and Urbanization aims to provide an effective means for the exchange of research findings, ideas and information in the fields of human settlements and environment among researchers, activists and non-governmental organizations (NGOs) in low- and middle-income nations and between these and researchers, international agency staff, students and teachers in high-income nations. Most of the papers it publishes are written by authors from Africa, Asia and Latin America. Papers may be submitted in French, Spanish or Portuguese, as well as English - and if accepted for publication, the journal arranges for their translation into English. The journal is also unusual in the proportion of its papers that are written by practitioners.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信