互补途径是欧洲人权法院推理中的“合法进入途径的真实有效途径”

IF 1.5 3区社会学 Q2 DEMOGRAPHY

European Journal of Migration and Law Pub Date : 2023-05-29 DOI:10.1163/15718166-12340150

Emiliya Bratanova van Harten

{"title":"互补途径是欧洲人权法院推理中的“合法进入途径的真实有效途径”","authors":"Emiliya Bratanova van Harten","doi":"10.1163/15718166-12340150","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nComplementary pathways are often viewed as an entirely political matter. While there is no legal obligation for states to introduce such, this article shows that their presence or absence has a bearing on how the ECtHR assesses compliance with the prohibition of collective expulsion of aliens. This concrete interaction between complementary pathways and human rights law has been introduced through the requirement of “genuine and effective access to means of legal entry” in the case law of the ECtHR. This article clarifies this requirement and assesses its general significance for the role of complementary pathways as a promotor of or a hindrance to human rights protection.","PeriodicalId":51819,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Migration and Law","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Complementary Pathways as “Genuine and Effective Access to Means of Legal Entry” in the Reasoning of the European Court of Human Rights\",\"authors\":\"Emiliya Bratanova van Harten\",\"doi\":\"10.1163/15718166-12340150\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nComplementary pathways are often viewed as an entirely political matter. While there is no legal obligation for states to introduce such, this article shows that their presence or absence has a bearing on how the ECtHR assesses compliance with the prohibition of collective expulsion of aliens. This concrete interaction between complementary pathways and human rights law has been introduced through the requirement of “genuine and effective access to means of legal entry” in the case law of the ECtHR. This article clarifies this requirement and assesses its general significance for the role of complementary pathways as a promotor of or a hindrance to human rights protection.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51819,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Migration and Law\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Migration and Law\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1163/15718166-12340150\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"DEMOGRAPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Migration and Law","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/15718166-12340150","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DEMOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 2

摘要

互补途径通常被视为完全是政治问题。虽然各国没有法律义务采取这种措施，但本条表明，这些措施的存在与否影响到欧洲人权委员会如何评估对禁止集体驱逐外国人的遵守情况。这种互补途径与人权法之间的具体相互作用是通过欧洲人权法院判例法中“真正和有效地获得合法进入途径”的要求而引入的。本文澄清了这一要求，并评估了其对于促进或阻碍人权保护的互补途径的作用的一般意义。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Complementary Pathways as “Genuine and Effective Access to Means of Legal Entry” in the Reasoning of the European Court of Human Rights

Complementary pathways are often viewed as an entirely political matter. While there is no legal obligation for states to introduce such, this article shows that their presence or absence has a bearing on how the ECtHR assesses compliance with the prohibition of collective expulsion of aliens. This concrete interaction between complementary pathways and human rights law has been introduced through the requirement of “genuine and effective access to means of legal entry” in the case law of the ECtHR. This article clarifies this requirement and assesses its general significance for the role of complementary pathways as a promotor of or a hindrance to human rights protection.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

European Journal of Migration and Law Multiple-

CiteScore

2.70

自引率

10.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： The European Journal of Migration and Law is a quarterly journal on migration law and policy with specific emphasis on the European Union, the Council of Europe and migration activities within the Organisation for Security and Cooperation in Europe. This journal differs from other migration journals by focusing on both the law and policy within the field of migration, as opposed to examining immigration and migration policies from a wholly sociological perspective. The Journal is the initiative of the Centre for Migration Law of the University of Nijmegen, in co-operation with the Brussels-based Migration Policy Group.