探索护理人员使用专科姑息治疗远程医疗服务的意向

IF 0.9 Q4 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
H. S. James, A. Smith, E. Thomas, C. Snoswell, L. Caffery, H. Haydon
{"title":"探索护理人员使用专科姑息治疗远程医疗服务的意向","authors":"H. S. James, A. Smith, E. Thomas, C. Snoswell, L. Caffery, H. Haydon","doi":"10.1080/09699260.2020.1852657","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A large proportion of expected deaths do not occur at home, despite often being the dying person’s preference. Paramedics play an integral role in hospital admissions when someone is close to death. As illness worsens, paramedics are often called and ascertain whether hospitalisation is appropriate. In a 12-month period, Ambulance Victoria (Australia) recorded 4348 palliative related callouts, 70% resulting in hospitalisation. Paramedics throughout the world recognise the need for extra palliative care training or support. One solution is a specialist palliative care support telehealth service from palliative specialists (usually in tertiary hospitals) to paramedics on call-outs to people with life-limiting illnesses. However, to maximise uptake and sustainability, it is prudent to examine factors that influence acceptance of such a service. In the current study, 112 paramedics employed by the Queensland Ambulance Service completed an online survey examining their Intention to Use the Specialist Palliative Care telehealth service as a function of the Technology Acceptance Model constructs (Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use and Attitudes toward technology) and Palliative Care Self-Efficacy. After controlling for age, a hierarchical multiple regression analysis demonstrated the predictive utility of Perceived Usefulness and Attitudes. Palliative Care Self-efficacy did not add any significant variance to the model. This research highlights the importance of addressing paramedics’ perceptions regarding the telehealth service and its usefulness when implementing a similar service model.","PeriodicalId":45106,"journal":{"name":"PROGRESS IN PALLIATIVE CARE","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/09699260.2020.1852657","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring paramedics’ intention to use a specialist palliative care telehealth service\",\"authors\":\"H. S. James, A. Smith, E. Thomas, C. Snoswell, L. Caffery, H. Haydon\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/09699260.2020.1852657\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A large proportion of expected deaths do not occur at home, despite often being the dying person’s preference. Paramedics play an integral role in hospital admissions when someone is close to death. As illness worsens, paramedics are often called and ascertain whether hospitalisation is appropriate. In a 12-month period, Ambulance Victoria (Australia) recorded 4348 palliative related callouts, 70% resulting in hospitalisation. Paramedics throughout the world recognise the need for extra palliative care training or support. One solution is a specialist palliative care support telehealth service from palliative specialists (usually in tertiary hospitals) to paramedics on call-outs to people with life-limiting illnesses. However, to maximise uptake and sustainability, it is prudent to examine factors that influence acceptance of such a service. In the current study, 112 paramedics employed by the Queensland Ambulance Service completed an online survey examining their Intention to Use the Specialist Palliative Care telehealth service as a function of the Technology Acceptance Model constructs (Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use and Attitudes toward technology) and Palliative Care Self-Efficacy. After controlling for age, a hierarchical multiple regression analysis demonstrated the predictive utility of Perceived Usefulness and Attitudes. Palliative Care Self-efficacy did not add any significant variance to the model. This research highlights the importance of addressing paramedics’ perceptions regarding the telehealth service and its usefulness when implementing a similar service model.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45106,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PROGRESS IN PALLIATIVE CARE\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-03-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/09699260.2020.1852657\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PROGRESS IN PALLIATIVE CARE\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/09699260.2020.1852657\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PROGRESS IN PALLIATIVE CARE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09699260.2020.1852657","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

很大一部分预期死亡不会发生在家里,尽管这通常是垂死者的偏好。当有人濒临死亡时,医护人员在入院时发挥着不可或缺的作用。随着病情的恶化,医护人员经常接到电话,确定住院是否合适。在12个月的时间里,维多利亚救护车(澳大利亚)记录了4348起与姑息治疗相关的呼叫,其中70%导致住院。全世界的医护人员都认识到需要额外的姑息治疗培训或支持。一种解决方案是提供专业的姑息治疗支持远程医疗服务,从姑息治疗专家(通常在三级医院)到护理人员,随时为患有限制生命疾病的人提供服务。然而,为了最大限度地提高接受率和可持续性,谨慎的做法是检查影响接受此类服务的因素。在目前的研究中,昆士兰救护车服务中心雇佣的112名护理人员完成了一项在线调查,根据技术接受模型结构(感知有用性、感知易用性和对技术的态度)和姑息治疗自我效能,考察了他们使用专业姑息治疗远程医疗服务的意愿。在控制了年龄后,分层多元回归分析证明了感知有用性和态度的预测效用。姑息治疗自我效能没有给模型增加任何显著的方差。这项研究强调了解决护理人员对远程医疗服务的看法及其在实施类似服务模式时的有用性的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Exploring paramedics’ intention to use a specialist palliative care telehealth service
A large proportion of expected deaths do not occur at home, despite often being the dying person’s preference. Paramedics play an integral role in hospital admissions when someone is close to death. As illness worsens, paramedics are often called and ascertain whether hospitalisation is appropriate. In a 12-month period, Ambulance Victoria (Australia) recorded 4348 palliative related callouts, 70% resulting in hospitalisation. Paramedics throughout the world recognise the need for extra palliative care training or support. One solution is a specialist palliative care support telehealth service from palliative specialists (usually in tertiary hospitals) to paramedics on call-outs to people with life-limiting illnesses. However, to maximise uptake and sustainability, it is prudent to examine factors that influence acceptance of such a service. In the current study, 112 paramedics employed by the Queensland Ambulance Service completed an online survey examining their Intention to Use the Specialist Palliative Care telehealth service as a function of the Technology Acceptance Model constructs (Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use and Attitudes toward technology) and Palliative Care Self-Efficacy. After controlling for age, a hierarchical multiple regression analysis demonstrated the predictive utility of Perceived Usefulness and Attitudes. Palliative Care Self-efficacy did not add any significant variance to the model. This research highlights the importance of addressing paramedics’ perceptions regarding the telehealth service and its usefulness when implementing a similar service model.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
PROGRESS IN PALLIATIVE CARE
PROGRESS IN PALLIATIVE CARE PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
11.80%
发文量
24
期刊介绍: Progress in Palliative Care is a peer reviewed, multidisciplinary journal with an international perspective. It provides a central point of reference for all members of the palliative care community: medical consultants, nurses, hospital support teams, home care teams, hospice directors and administrators, pain centre staff, social workers, chaplains, counsellors, information staff, paramedical staff and self-help groups. The emphasis of the journal is on the rapid exchange of information amongst those working in palliative care. Progress in Palliative Care embraces all aspects of the management of the problems of end-stage disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信