腹腔镜附件手术的多模式疼痛管理:一项比较队列研究

Q4 Medicine
Angsumalin Wirat, H. Tintara, S. Nimmaanrat
{"title":"腹腔镜附件手术的多模式疼痛管理:一项比较队列研究","authors":"Angsumalin Wirat, H. Tintara, S. Nimmaanrat","doi":"10.14456/TJOG.2017.8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: To determine the morphine-sparing effect of multimodal pain management for laparoscopic surgery. Materials and Methods : A retrospective cohort study was carried out in 210 patients who underwent laparoscopic adnexal surgery from August 2008 to November 2013 at the Songklanagarind Hospital. The patients were divided into three groups (n = 70 each) according to analgesic management. Group I received parecoxib 40 mg intravenously 2 hours preoperatively with postoperative paracetamol/NSAIDs around the clock, Group II received parecoxib 40 mg intravenously 15-30 minutes preoperatively with postoperative paracetamol/NSAIDs as needed, and Group III received only postoperative paracetamol/NSAIDs as needed. Morphine or fentanyl was used during operation and morphine was used as needed for severe postoperative pain in all cases. Patients in each group were matched by the operation in the same time period. The consumption of analgesic agents during surgery and 24 hours postoperation, pain scores, and adverse events were evaluated. Results: Intraoperative morphine consumption was not different among the 3 groups. However, in the 24 hours postoperation, 40% of patients in Group I received morphine (mean 1.1 mg) compared to 68.6% in Group II (mean 6.1 mg) and 80% in Group III (mean 9.6 mg) (p < 0.01). Group I received more postoperative paracetamol/NSAIDs than both Group II and Group III (p < 0.01). Group I had 88.5% morphine-sparing effect compared to Group III and 82% compared to Group II. The pain scores were similar between the groups. Conclusions: Preemptive parecoxib and postoperative paracetamol/NSAIDs provide a significant morphine-sparing effect in laparoscopic adnexal surgery.","PeriodicalId":36742,"journal":{"name":"Thai Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology","volume":"25 1","pages":"44-51"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Multimodal Pain Management for Laparoscopic Adnexal Surgery: A comparative cohort study\",\"authors\":\"Angsumalin Wirat, H. Tintara, S. Nimmaanrat\",\"doi\":\"10.14456/TJOG.2017.8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objectives: To determine the morphine-sparing effect of multimodal pain management for laparoscopic surgery. Materials and Methods : A retrospective cohort study was carried out in 210 patients who underwent laparoscopic adnexal surgery from August 2008 to November 2013 at the Songklanagarind Hospital. The patients were divided into three groups (n = 70 each) according to analgesic management. Group I received parecoxib 40 mg intravenously 2 hours preoperatively with postoperative paracetamol/NSAIDs around the clock, Group II received parecoxib 40 mg intravenously 15-30 minutes preoperatively with postoperative paracetamol/NSAIDs as needed, and Group III received only postoperative paracetamol/NSAIDs as needed. Morphine or fentanyl was used during operation and morphine was used as needed for severe postoperative pain in all cases. Patients in each group were matched by the operation in the same time period. The consumption of analgesic agents during surgery and 24 hours postoperation, pain scores, and adverse events were evaluated. Results: Intraoperative morphine consumption was not different among the 3 groups. However, in the 24 hours postoperation, 40% of patients in Group I received morphine (mean 1.1 mg) compared to 68.6% in Group II (mean 6.1 mg) and 80% in Group III (mean 9.6 mg) (p < 0.01). Group I received more postoperative paracetamol/NSAIDs than both Group II and Group III (p < 0.01). Group I had 88.5% morphine-sparing effect compared to Group III and 82% compared to Group II. The pain scores were similar between the groups. Conclusions: Preemptive parecoxib and postoperative paracetamol/NSAIDs provide a significant morphine-sparing effect in laparoscopic adnexal surgery.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36742,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Thai Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"44-51\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-03-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Thai Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14456/TJOG.2017.8\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Thai Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14456/TJOG.2017.8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:确定腹腔镜手术中多模式疼痛管理的吗啡保留效果。材料和方法:对2008年8月至2013年11月在Songklanagarind医院接受腹腔镜附件手术的210名患者进行回顾性队列研究。根据镇痛管理将患者分为三组(每组70例)。第一组在术前2小时静脉注射帕来昔布40 mg,术后24小时静脉注射对乙酰氨基酚/NSAID,第二组在术后15-30分钟静脉注射帕来昔布40 g,术后根据需要注射对乙酰氨酚/NSAIDs,第三组根据需要仅在术后接受对乙酰氨基苯酚/NSAID。术中使用吗啡或芬太尼,所有病例术后严重疼痛均按需使用吗啡。每组患者在同一时间段内通过手术进行匹配。评估手术期间和术后24小时镇痛剂的消耗量、疼痛评分和不良事件。结果:三组患者术中吗啡用量差异无统计学意义。然而,在术后24小时内,第一组40%的患者接受了吗啡(平均1.1 mg),而第二组为68.6%(平均6.1 mg),第三组为80%(平均9.6 mg)(p<0.01)。第一组术后接受的对乙酰氨基酚/非甾体抗炎药比第二组和第三组都多(p<0.01)。与第三组相比,第一组吗啡保留率为88.5%,与第二组相比为82%。两组之间的疼痛评分相似。结论:在腹腔镜附件手术中,先发制人的帕来昔布和术后的扑热息痛/NSAID具有显著的吗啡保留效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Multimodal Pain Management for Laparoscopic Adnexal Surgery: A comparative cohort study
Objectives: To determine the morphine-sparing effect of multimodal pain management for laparoscopic surgery. Materials and Methods : A retrospective cohort study was carried out in 210 patients who underwent laparoscopic adnexal surgery from August 2008 to November 2013 at the Songklanagarind Hospital. The patients were divided into three groups (n = 70 each) according to analgesic management. Group I received parecoxib 40 mg intravenously 2 hours preoperatively with postoperative paracetamol/NSAIDs around the clock, Group II received parecoxib 40 mg intravenously 15-30 minutes preoperatively with postoperative paracetamol/NSAIDs as needed, and Group III received only postoperative paracetamol/NSAIDs as needed. Morphine or fentanyl was used during operation and morphine was used as needed for severe postoperative pain in all cases. Patients in each group were matched by the operation in the same time period. The consumption of analgesic agents during surgery and 24 hours postoperation, pain scores, and adverse events were evaluated. Results: Intraoperative morphine consumption was not different among the 3 groups. However, in the 24 hours postoperation, 40% of patients in Group I received morphine (mean 1.1 mg) compared to 68.6% in Group II (mean 6.1 mg) and 80% in Group III (mean 9.6 mg) (p < 0.01). Group I received more postoperative paracetamol/NSAIDs than both Group II and Group III (p < 0.01). Group I had 88.5% morphine-sparing effect compared to Group III and 82% compared to Group II. The pain scores were similar between the groups. Conclusions: Preemptive parecoxib and postoperative paracetamol/NSAIDs provide a significant morphine-sparing effect in laparoscopic adnexal surgery.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Thai Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
Thai Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Medicine-Obstetrics and Gynecology
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
3
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信