土耳其和美国的历史保护:跨文化比较

IF 0.3 4区 艺术学 0 ARCHITECTURE
Prostor Pub Date : 2022-06-28 DOI:10.31522/p.30.1(63).7
Gülşen Dişli
{"title":"土耳其和美国的历史保护:跨文化比较","authors":"Gülşen Dişli","doi":"10.31522/p.30.1(63).7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The research examines and compares the various roles of governmental and non-governmental organizations (NGOs) in Turkey and the United States, aiming to assess how they shaped the preservation field and their potential knowledge transfer values. The study was conducted in governmental archives, official websites of related organizations and through oral communication and literature surveys related to preservation foundations, NGOs, and waqfs in both countries - with different national, historic, religious, and cultural characteristics. The parameters used as cross-cultural comparison included primary actors and main legislations in preservation both in history and at present. The research has revealed that the waqf system in Turkey has a deep-rooted historic, religious, and socio-cultural context, and differs from the preservation foundations in the USA in many respects. Yet, the foundations established in and after the 20th century in Turkey and the preservation activities of foundations in both countries also share similar motives, stimuli, and objectives to preserve both natural/cultural heritage and cross-cultural comparisons suggest that they may learn from each other by knowledge transfer.","PeriodicalId":42738,"journal":{"name":"Prostor","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Historic Preservation in Turkey and the United States: a Cross-Cultural Comparison\",\"authors\":\"Gülşen Dişli\",\"doi\":\"10.31522/p.30.1(63).7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The research examines and compares the various roles of governmental and non-governmental organizations (NGOs) in Turkey and the United States, aiming to assess how they shaped the preservation field and their potential knowledge transfer values. The study was conducted in governmental archives, official websites of related organizations and through oral communication and literature surveys related to preservation foundations, NGOs, and waqfs in both countries - with different national, historic, religious, and cultural characteristics. The parameters used as cross-cultural comparison included primary actors and main legislations in preservation both in history and at present. The research has revealed that the waqf system in Turkey has a deep-rooted historic, religious, and socio-cultural context, and differs from the preservation foundations in the USA in many respects. Yet, the foundations established in and after the 20th century in Turkey and the preservation activities of foundations in both countries also share similar motives, stimuli, and objectives to preserve both natural/cultural heritage and cross-cultural comparisons suggest that they may learn from each other by knowledge transfer.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42738,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Prostor\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Prostor\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31522/p.30.1(63).7\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"艺术学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ARCHITECTURE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prostor","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31522/p.30.1(63).7","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ARCHITECTURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这项研究考察并比较了土耳其和美国政府和非政府组织的各种作用,旨在评估它们如何塑造保护领域及其潜在的知识转移价值。这项研究是在政府档案馆、相关组织的官方网站上进行的,并通过与两国具有不同民族、历史、宗教和文化特征的保护基金会、非政府组织和宗教基金会有关的口头交流和文献调查进行的。用作跨文化比较的参数包括历史和当前保护的主要参与者和主要立法。研究表明,土耳其的宗教基金制度有着根深蒂固的历史、宗教和社会文化背景,在许多方面与美国的保护基金会不同。然而,20世纪前后在土耳其建立的基金会和两国基金会的保护活动也有着相似的动机、刺激因素和目标,以保护自然/文化遗产和跨文化比较表明,它们可以通过知识转移相互学习。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Historic Preservation in Turkey and the United States: a Cross-Cultural Comparison
The research examines and compares the various roles of governmental and non-governmental organizations (NGOs) in Turkey and the United States, aiming to assess how they shaped the preservation field and their potential knowledge transfer values. The study was conducted in governmental archives, official websites of related organizations and through oral communication and literature surveys related to preservation foundations, NGOs, and waqfs in both countries - with different national, historic, religious, and cultural characteristics. The parameters used as cross-cultural comparison included primary actors and main legislations in preservation both in history and at present. The research has revealed that the waqf system in Turkey has a deep-rooted historic, religious, and socio-cultural context, and differs from the preservation foundations in the USA in many respects. Yet, the foundations established in and after the 20th century in Turkey and the preservation activities of foundations in both countries also share similar motives, stimuli, and objectives to preserve both natural/cultural heritage and cross-cultural comparisons suggest that they may learn from each other by knowledge transfer.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Prostor
Prostor ARCHITECTURE-
自引率
66.70%
发文量
10
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal PROSTOR publishes scientific papers from all branches of architecture and urban planning as well as texts from other fields of science (art history, archaeology, ethnology, sociology, geography, civil engineering, geodesy, forestry, design...) if their content relates to architectural issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信