评估伊朗放射技师和CT技术人员关于计算机断层扫描参数的知识水平

Q1 Health Professions
Zahra Kazemi , Khadijeh Hajimiri , Faranak Saghatchi , Mikaeil Molazadeh , Hamed Rezaeejam
{"title":"评估伊朗放射技师和CT技术人员关于计算机断层扫描参数的知识水平","authors":"Zahra Kazemi ,&nbsp;Khadijeh Hajimiri ,&nbsp;Faranak Saghatchi ,&nbsp;Mikaeil Molazadeh ,&nbsp;Hamed Rezaeejam","doi":"10.1016/j.radmp.2023.01.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To evaluate the knowledge of CT technologists and radiographers concerning CT parameters, in order to keep CT users be aware of all CT parameters and their impact on image quality and patient dose while keeping their knowledge up to date.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This cross-sectional descriptive-analytic study was conducted in Zanjan province, Iran, using a valid and reliable online questionnaire with 53 questions distributed to 153 radiology personnel. Each questionnaire included questions about demographic characteristics and CT parameters, including kVp, mAs, image noise, slice thickness, pitch and automatic tube current modulation (ATCM), and the effects of these parameters on image quality and radiation dose.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A response rate of 61.0% (94/153) was achieved. This study enrolled 30 radiographers and 64 CT technologists. There was no significant difference in the mean scores of the two groups (52.16 <span><math><mrow><mo>±</mo></mrow></math></span> 9.90 <em>vs.</em> 56.09 <span><math><mrow><mo>±</mo></mrow></math></span> 12.00, <em>t</em> ​= ​−1.545, <em>P</em> ​= ​0.126). CT personnel had the highest and lowest knowledge scores in image reconstruction (<em>t</em> ​= ​−28.33, <em>P</em> ​= ​0.001) and mAs (<em>t</em> ​= ​4.27, <em>P</em> ​= ​0.590), respectively, whereas radiographers had the highest and lowest knowledge scores in the fields of image noise (<em>t</em> ​= ​9.85, <em>P</em> ​= ​0.015) and kVp (<em>t</em> ​= ​−12.73, <em>P</em> ​= ​0.007), respectively.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The total knowledge scores of CT technologists and radiographers for various scan parameters affecting image quality and dose were insufficient. Thus, it is recommended that regular retraining courses be held to enhance and update technologists’ knowledge.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":34051,"journal":{"name":"Radiation Medicine and Protection","volume":"4 1","pages":"Pages 60-64"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment of the knowledge level of radiographers and CT technologists regarding computed tomography parameters in Iran\",\"authors\":\"Zahra Kazemi ,&nbsp;Khadijeh Hajimiri ,&nbsp;Faranak Saghatchi ,&nbsp;Mikaeil Molazadeh ,&nbsp;Hamed Rezaeejam\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.radmp.2023.01.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To evaluate the knowledge of CT technologists and radiographers concerning CT parameters, in order to keep CT users be aware of all CT parameters and their impact on image quality and patient dose while keeping their knowledge up to date.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This cross-sectional descriptive-analytic study was conducted in Zanjan province, Iran, using a valid and reliable online questionnaire with 53 questions distributed to 153 radiology personnel. Each questionnaire included questions about demographic characteristics and CT parameters, including kVp, mAs, image noise, slice thickness, pitch and automatic tube current modulation (ATCM), and the effects of these parameters on image quality and radiation dose.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A response rate of 61.0% (94/153) was achieved. This study enrolled 30 radiographers and 64 CT technologists. There was no significant difference in the mean scores of the two groups (52.16 <span><math><mrow><mo>±</mo></mrow></math></span> 9.90 <em>vs.</em> 56.09 <span><math><mrow><mo>±</mo></mrow></math></span> 12.00, <em>t</em> ​= ​−1.545, <em>P</em> ​= ​0.126). CT personnel had the highest and lowest knowledge scores in image reconstruction (<em>t</em> ​= ​−28.33, <em>P</em> ​= ​0.001) and mAs (<em>t</em> ​= ​4.27, <em>P</em> ​= ​0.590), respectively, whereas radiographers had the highest and lowest knowledge scores in the fields of image noise (<em>t</em> ​= ​9.85, <em>P</em> ​= ​0.015) and kVp (<em>t</em> ​= ​−12.73, <em>P</em> ​= ​0.007), respectively.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The total knowledge scores of CT technologists and radiographers for various scan parameters affecting image quality and dose were insufficient. Thus, it is recommended that regular retraining courses be held to enhance and update technologists’ knowledge.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":34051,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Radiation Medicine and Protection\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"Pages 60-64\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Radiation Medicine and Protection\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666555723000023\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Health Professions\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiation Medicine and Protection","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666555723000023","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

目的评估CT技师和放射技师对CT参数的知识,使CT用户了解所有CT参数及其对图像质量和患者剂量的影响,同时保持其知识的与时俱进。方法本横断面描述性分析研究在伊朗赞詹省进行,采用有效可靠的在线调查问卷,向153名放射学人员分发了53个问题。问卷包括人口学特征和CT参数,包括kVp、mAs、图像噪声、切片厚度、节距和自动管电流调制(ATCM),以及这些参数对图像质量和辐射剂量的影响。结果有效率为61.0%(94/153)。这项研究招募了30名放射技师和64名CT技师。两组患者的平均评分比较,差异无统计学意义(52.16±9.90∶56.09±12.00,t =−1.545,P = 0.126)。CT人员在图像重建(t = - 28.33, P = 0.001)和mAs (t = 4.27, P = 0.590)知识得分最高和最低,而放射技师在图像噪声(t = 9.85, P = 0.015)和kVp (t = - 12.73, P = 0.007)知识得分最高和最低。结论CT技师和放射技师对影响图像质量和剂量的各项扫描参数的总知识得分不足。因此,建议定期举办再培训课程,以提高和更新技术人员的知识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessment of the knowledge level of radiographers and CT technologists regarding computed tomography parameters in Iran

Objective

To evaluate the knowledge of CT technologists and radiographers concerning CT parameters, in order to keep CT users be aware of all CT parameters and their impact on image quality and patient dose while keeping their knowledge up to date.

Methods

This cross-sectional descriptive-analytic study was conducted in Zanjan province, Iran, using a valid and reliable online questionnaire with 53 questions distributed to 153 radiology personnel. Each questionnaire included questions about demographic characteristics and CT parameters, including kVp, mAs, image noise, slice thickness, pitch and automatic tube current modulation (ATCM), and the effects of these parameters on image quality and radiation dose.

Results

A response rate of 61.0% (94/153) was achieved. This study enrolled 30 radiographers and 64 CT technologists. There was no significant difference in the mean scores of the two groups (52.16 ± 9.90 vs. 56.09 ± 12.00, t ​= ​−1.545, P ​= ​0.126). CT personnel had the highest and lowest knowledge scores in image reconstruction (t ​= ​−28.33, P ​= ​0.001) and mAs (t ​= ​4.27, P ​= ​0.590), respectively, whereas radiographers had the highest and lowest knowledge scores in the fields of image noise (t ​= ​9.85, P ​= ​0.015) and kVp (t ​= ​−12.73, P ​= ​0.007), respectively.

Conclusions

The total knowledge scores of CT technologists and radiographers for various scan parameters affecting image quality and dose were insufficient. Thus, it is recommended that regular retraining courses be held to enhance and update technologists’ knowledge.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Radiation Medicine and Protection
Radiation Medicine and Protection Health Professions-Emergency Medical Services
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
103 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信