多囊卵巢综合征患者Amh对Icsi周期妊娠率的影响

Ahmed Abd El-Hay
{"title":"多囊卵巢综合征患者Amh对Icsi周期妊娠率的影响","authors":"Ahmed Abd El-Hay","doi":"10.31579/2642-9756/068","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Surgical site infections (SSIs) pose considerable morbidity and account for up to 20% of all nosocomial infections in surgical patients Aim of the Work: to determine the efficacy & safety of irrigation of subcutaneous tissue by Gentamicin for caesarean section Incision in reducing the risk of post-caesarean wound complications among obese women compared with placebo. Patients and Methods: This prospective randomized clinical trial study was conducted on total 132 obese patients who underwent elective cesarean section at Ain Shams University Maternity hospitals. This study was conducted on obese women undergoing caesarean section at Ain Shams University Maternity Hospital with the following inclusion and exclusion criteria. Patients were distributed randomly into 2 groups using a computer based program: Group (A) N = 66: CS with Irrigation of subcutaneous tissue by placebo (200 ml of saline 0.9 %). Group (B) N = 66: CS with irrigation of subcutaneous tissue by Gentamicin solution (1mg/kg gentamicin in 200 ml of saline 0.9%). Results: The results of this study revealed that the rate of SSI was less in gentamycin (3%) (n=2/66) than control group (4.5%) (n=3/66) with no statistical significance between them. Postoperative hospital stay and readmission rate due to SSI for the gentamycin group were also shorter but not statistically different in compared to the control group. Applying local gentamycin antibiotic irrigation during wound closure after cesarean section in obese patients is not recommended. NO role of local gentamycin irrigation in subcutaneous tissue in prevention of wound surgical site infection. Conclusion: as evident from the current study, in obese women undergoing elective CS, wound irrigation with Gentamicin is not superior to wound irrigation with placebo (saline 0.9) regarding efficacy & safety.","PeriodicalId":93058,"journal":{"name":"Women health care and issues","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of Amh in Patients with Polycystic Ovarian Syndrome on Pregnancy Rate in Icsi Cycle\",\"authors\":\"Ahmed Abd El-Hay\",\"doi\":\"10.31579/2642-9756/068\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Surgical site infections (SSIs) pose considerable morbidity and account for up to 20% of all nosocomial infections in surgical patients Aim of the Work: to determine the efficacy & safety of irrigation of subcutaneous tissue by Gentamicin for caesarean section Incision in reducing the risk of post-caesarean wound complications among obese women compared with placebo. Patients and Methods: This prospective randomized clinical trial study was conducted on total 132 obese patients who underwent elective cesarean section at Ain Shams University Maternity hospitals. This study was conducted on obese women undergoing caesarean section at Ain Shams University Maternity Hospital with the following inclusion and exclusion criteria. Patients were distributed randomly into 2 groups using a computer based program: Group (A) N = 66: CS with Irrigation of subcutaneous tissue by placebo (200 ml of saline 0.9 %). Group (B) N = 66: CS with irrigation of subcutaneous tissue by Gentamicin solution (1mg/kg gentamicin in 200 ml of saline 0.9%). Results: The results of this study revealed that the rate of SSI was less in gentamycin (3%) (n=2/66) than control group (4.5%) (n=3/66) with no statistical significance between them. Postoperative hospital stay and readmission rate due to SSI for the gentamycin group were also shorter but not statistically different in compared to the control group. Applying local gentamycin antibiotic irrigation during wound closure after cesarean section in obese patients is not recommended. NO role of local gentamycin irrigation in subcutaneous tissue in prevention of wound surgical site infection. Conclusion: as evident from the current study, in obese women undergoing elective CS, wound irrigation with Gentamicin is not superior to wound irrigation with placebo (saline 0.9) regarding efficacy & safety.\",\"PeriodicalId\":93058,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Women health care and issues\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-05-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Women health care and issues\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31579/2642-9756/068\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Women health care and issues","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31579/2642-9756/068","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:手术部位感染(SSIs)具有相当高的发病率,占手术患者所有医院感染的20%。本工作的目的:确定庆大霉素皮下组织冲洗用于剖腹产切口的有效性和安全性。与安慰剂相比,切口在降低肥胖妇女剖宫产后伤口并发症风险方面的作用。患者和方法:这项前瞻性随机临床试验研究对在艾因沙姆斯大学妇产医院接受选择性剖宫产手术的132名肥胖患者进行了研究。这项研究是针对在艾因沙姆斯大学妇产医院接受剖腹产手术的肥胖女性进行的,纳入和排除标准如下。使用基于计算机的程序将患者随机分为两组:组(a)N=66:CS,用安慰剂(200 ml 0.9%生理盐水)冲洗皮下组织。结果:庆大霉素组SSI发生率为3%(N=2/66),低于对照组4.5%(N=3/66),二者无统计学意义。与对照组相比,庆大霉素组的术后住院时间和SSI导致的再入院率也较短,但没有统计学差异。不建议在肥胖患者剖宫产术后伤口闭合时应用局部庆大霉素抗生素冲洗。皮下组织局部庆大霉素冲洗在预防伤口手术部位感染中的作用。结论:从目前的研究中可以明显看出,在接受选择性CS的肥胖女性中,在疗效和安全性方面,庆大霉素伤口冲洗并不优于安慰剂(生理盐水0.9)伤口冲洗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effect of Amh in Patients with Polycystic Ovarian Syndrome on Pregnancy Rate in Icsi Cycle
Background: Surgical site infections (SSIs) pose considerable morbidity and account for up to 20% of all nosocomial infections in surgical patients Aim of the Work: to determine the efficacy & safety of irrigation of subcutaneous tissue by Gentamicin for caesarean section Incision in reducing the risk of post-caesarean wound complications among obese women compared with placebo. Patients and Methods: This prospective randomized clinical trial study was conducted on total 132 obese patients who underwent elective cesarean section at Ain Shams University Maternity hospitals. This study was conducted on obese women undergoing caesarean section at Ain Shams University Maternity Hospital with the following inclusion and exclusion criteria. Patients were distributed randomly into 2 groups using a computer based program: Group (A) N = 66: CS with Irrigation of subcutaneous tissue by placebo (200 ml of saline 0.9 %). Group (B) N = 66: CS with irrigation of subcutaneous tissue by Gentamicin solution (1mg/kg gentamicin in 200 ml of saline 0.9%). Results: The results of this study revealed that the rate of SSI was less in gentamycin (3%) (n=2/66) than control group (4.5%) (n=3/66) with no statistical significance between them. Postoperative hospital stay and readmission rate due to SSI for the gentamycin group were also shorter but not statistically different in compared to the control group. Applying local gentamycin antibiotic irrigation during wound closure after cesarean section in obese patients is not recommended. NO role of local gentamycin irrigation in subcutaneous tissue in prevention of wound surgical site infection. Conclusion: as evident from the current study, in obese women undergoing elective CS, wound irrigation with Gentamicin is not superior to wound irrigation with placebo (saline 0.9) regarding efficacy & safety.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信