{"title":"如何建设一个国家?犹太复国主义融资中的慈善和资本主义方法","authors":"Adam Hefetz","doi":"10.1080/13531042.2022.2213486","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT In this article, I identify two ideological currents within the Zionist movement, a philanthropic one and a capitalist one. Institutionally, the philanthropic current manifested through Keren Ha-Yesod and the capitalist one through the two Zionist banks, the Jewish Colonial Trust and the Anglo-Palestine Company. Despite the different ideologies and modes of operation associated with these financing institutions, the three of them were in fact tightly connected and at certain junctures dependent on each other for their survival. The economic context in which the financing institutions of Zionism operated determined their relative strength within their relationship, whereas ideology played a secondary role.","PeriodicalId":43363,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Israeli History","volume":"40 1","pages":"303 - 320"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How to build a country? Philanthropy and capitalist methods in the financing of Zionism\",\"authors\":\"Adam Hefetz\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13531042.2022.2213486\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT In this article, I identify two ideological currents within the Zionist movement, a philanthropic one and a capitalist one. Institutionally, the philanthropic current manifested through Keren Ha-Yesod and the capitalist one through the two Zionist banks, the Jewish Colonial Trust and the Anglo-Palestine Company. Despite the different ideologies and modes of operation associated with these financing institutions, the three of them were in fact tightly connected and at certain junctures dependent on each other for their survival. The economic context in which the financing institutions of Zionism operated determined their relative strength within their relationship, whereas ideology played a secondary role.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43363,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Israeli History\",\"volume\":\"40 1\",\"pages\":\"303 - 320\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Israeli History\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13531042.2022.2213486\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Israeli History","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13531042.2022.2213486","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
摘要在这篇文章中,我发现了犹太复国主义运动中的两股思潮,一股是慈善思潮,另一股是资本主义思潮。从制度上讲,慈善潮流通过Keren Ha Yesod表现出来,资本主义潮流通过两家犹太复国主义银行,犹太殖民信托和英国巴勒斯坦公司表现出来。尽管这些金融机构有着不同的意识形态和运作模式,但它们三者实际上是紧密相连的,在某些时刻相互依赖才能生存。犹太复国主义融资机构运作的经济背景决定了它们在关系中的相对实力,而意识形态起着次要作用。
How to build a country? Philanthropy and capitalist methods in the financing of Zionism
ABSTRACT In this article, I identify two ideological currents within the Zionist movement, a philanthropic one and a capitalist one. Institutionally, the philanthropic current manifested through Keren Ha-Yesod and the capitalist one through the two Zionist banks, the Jewish Colonial Trust and the Anglo-Palestine Company. Despite the different ideologies and modes of operation associated with these financing institutions, the three of them were in fact tightly connected and at certain junctures dependent on each other for their survival. The economic context in which the financing institutions of Zionism operated determined their relative strength within their relationship, whereas ideology played a secondary role.