游戏的不透明性：对评论员的回应

IF 1.2 3区哲学 Q3 ETHICS

Journal of the Philosophy of Sport Pub Date : 2021-09-02 DOI:10.1080/00948705.2021.1993870

C. T. Nguyen

{"title":"游戏的不透明性：对评论员的回应","authors":"C. T. Nguyen","doi":"10.1080/00948705.2021.1993870","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"First, let me thank all my wonderful commentators, and the editors at the Journal of the Philosophy of Sport for this extraordinary opportunity. I had harbored suspicions, as I worked away on Games: Agency as Art, that I was pouring my heart out into a hopelessly niche product, borne of my own private obsessions. I am so grateful to have this bounty of interest and commentary from so many walks of philosophy. It is quite tempting, in a situation like this, to try and defend myself from every jab and criticism, but the result would be miserably compressed and spiritually impoverished. Instead, I will cover a handful of key points in detail. Much of the commentary clusters around a few topics, indicating some intellectual centers of gravity for my readers’ concerns. I will focus on these clusters; I apologize to my commentators for all the other exchanges that will fall by the wayside. The three centers of gravity I take to be:","PeriodicalId":46532,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Philosophy of Sport","volume":"48 1","pages":"448 - 475"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The opacity of play: a reply to commentators\",\"authors\":\"C. T. Nguyen\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00948705.2021.1993870\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"First, let me thank all my wonderful commentators, and the editors at the Journal of the Philosophy of Sport for this extraordinary opportunity. I had harbored suspicions, as I worked away on Games: Agency as Art, that I was pouring my heart out into a hopelessly niche product, borne of my own private obsessions. I am so grateful to have this bounty of interest and commentary from so many walks of philosophy. It is quite tempting, in a situation like this, to try and defend myself from every jab and criticism, but the result would be miserably compressed and spiritually impoverished. Instead, I will cover a handful of key points in detail. Much of the commentary clusters around a few topics, indicating some intellectual centers of gravity for my readers’ concerns. I will focus on these clusters; I apologize to my commentators for all the other exchanges that will fall by the wayside. The three centers of gravity I take to be:\",\"PeriodicalId\":46532,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the Philosophy of Sport\",\"volume\":\"48 1\",\"pages\":\"448 - 475\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the Philosophy of Sport\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00948705.2021.1993870\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ETHICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Philosophy of Sport","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00948705.2021.1993870","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 2

摘要

首先，我要感谢所有出色的解说员，以及《体育哲学杂志》的编辑们给我这次难得的机会。当我致力于《Games: Agency as Art》时，我便开始怀疑自己是否将自己的全部精力投入到一款毫无希望的利基产品中。我非常感激能得到这么多哲学领域的兴趣和评论。在这种情况下，试图保护自己免受每一次抨击和批评是相当诱人的，但结果将是悲惨的压缩和精神贫乏。相反，我将详细介绍几个关键点。许多评论都集中在几个主题上，为我的读者所关注的问题指明了一些知识重心。我将重点讨论这些集群;我向我的评论员们道歉，因为所有其他的交流都将被搁置一边。我认为的三个重心是

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

The opacity of play: a reply to commentators

First, let me thank all my wonderful commentators, and the editors at the Journal of the Philosophy of Sport for this extraordinary opportunity. I had harbored suspicions, as I worked away on Games: Agency as Art, that I was pouring my heart out into a hopelessly niche product, borne of my own private obsessions. I am so grateful to have this bounty of interest and commentary from so many walks of philosophy. It is quite tempting, in a situation like this, to try and defend myself from every jab and criticism, but the result would be miserably compressed and spiritually impoverished. Instead, I will cover a handful of key points in detail. Much of the commentary clusters around a few topics, indicating some intellectual centers of gravity for my readers’ concerns. I will focus on these clusters; I apologize to my commentators for all the other exchanges that will fall by the wayside. The three centers of gravity I take to be:

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Journal of the Philosophy of Sport Multiple-

CiteScore

1.90

自引率

14.30%

发文量

期刊介绍： The Journal of the Philosophy of Sport (JPS) is the most respected medium for communicating contemporary philosophic thought with regard to sport. It contains stimulating articles, critical reviews of work completed, and philosophic discussions about the philosophy of sport. JPS is published twice a year for the International Association for the Philosophy of Sport; members receive it as part of their membership. To subscribe to either the print or e-version of JPS, press the Subscribe or Renew button at the top of this screen.