专断的回归:佩科夫的《三位一体》、宾斯旺格的《地狱》、不受欢迎的可能性——以及一只当总统的鹦鹉

Q1 Arts and Humanities

The Journal of Ayn Rand Studies Pub Date : 2019-06-26 DOI:10.5325/JAYNRANDSTUD.19.1.0083

R. Campbell

{"title":"专断的回归:佩科夫的《三位一体》、宾斯旺格的《地狱》、不受欢迎的可能性——以及一只当总统的鹦鹉","authors":"R. Campbell","doi":"10.5325/JAYNRANDSTUD.19.1.0083","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT:Leonard Peikoff brought into Objectivist epistemology the doctrine that what is asserted arbitrarily (without adequate evidence) cannot be true or false. In 2008 the author gave a detailed critique of the doctrine; it has not received a published response. But there have been restatements by Harry Binswanger, Ben Bayer, and Gregory Salmieri. Their re-presentations do not refute any old arguments; their new arguments make the doctrine worse. The doctrine is being used to justify ignoring known possibilities, and to \"prove\" that the current president of the United States has a parrot's mind in a human body. Its public retraction is overdue.","PeriodicalId":35149,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Ayn Rand Studies","volume":"19 1","pages":"134 - 83"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Return of the Arbitrary: Peikoff's Trinity, Binswanger's Inferno, Unwanted Possibilities—and a Parrot for President\",\"authors\":\"R. Campbell\",\"doi\":\"10.5325/JAYNRANDSTUD.19.1.0083\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT:Leonard Peikoff brought into Objectivist epistemology the doctrine that what is asserted arbitrarily (without adequate evidence) cannot be true or false. In 2008 the author gave a detailed critique of the doctrine; it has not received a published response. But there have been restatements by Harry Binswanger, Ben Bayer, and Gregory Salmieri. Their re-presentations do not refute any old arguments; their new arguments make the doctrine worse. The doctrine is being used to justify ignoring known possibilities, and to \\\"prove\\\" that the current president of the United States has a parrot's mind in a human body. Its public retraction is overdue.\",\"PeriodicalId\":35149,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of Ayn Rand Studies\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"134 - 83\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-06-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of Ayn Rand Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5325/JAYNRANDSTUD.19.1.0083\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Ayn Rand Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5325/JAYNRANDSTUD.19.1.0083","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:伦纳德·佩科夫在客观主义认识论中引入了一种学说，即武断地断言(没有充分的证据)的东西不能是真或假。2008年，作者对该学说进行了详细的批评;它还没有收到公开的回应。但哈利·宾斯旺格、本·拜尔和格里高利·萨尔米耶里也重申了这一点。他们的再现并没有反驳任何旧的论点;他们的新论点使这一学说变得更糟。这一理论被用来为无视已知的可能性辩护，并“证明”现任美国总统在人体内拥有鹦鹉的大脑。它的公开撤回来得太迟了。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

The Return of the Arbitrary: Peikoff's Trinity, Binswanger's Inferno, Unwanted Possibilities—and a Parrot for President

ABSTRACT:Leonard Peikoff brought into Objectivist epistemology the doctrine that what is asserted arbitrarily (without adequate evidence) cannot be true or false. In 2008 the author gave a detailed critique of the doctrine; it has not received a published response. But there have been restatements by Harry Binswanger, Ben Bayer, and Gregory Salmieri. Their re-presentations do not refute any old arguments; their new arguments make the doctrine worse. The doctrine is being used to justify ignoring known possibilities, and to "prove" that the current president of the United States has a parrot's mind in a human body. Its public retraction is overdue.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

The Journal of Ayn Rand Studies Arts and Humanities-Literature and Literary Theory

CiteScore

0.50

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： The Journal of Ayn Rand Studies Foundation has entered into an electronic licensing relationship with EBSCO Publishing, the world"s most prolific aggregator of full-text journals, magazines, and other sources. The full text of The Journal of Ayn Rand Studies can be found on EBSCO Publishing"s databases. A nonpartisan journal devoted to the study of Ayn Rand and her times. The journal is not aligned with any advocacy group, institute, or person. It welcomes papers from every discipline and from a variety of interpretive and critical perspectives. It aims to foster scholarly dialogue through a respectful exchange of ideas. The journal is published semi-annually, in the fall and the spring.