游离性健忘症超越记忆功能的证据

IF 0.9 4区 社会学 Q2 LAW
A. L. Manzanero, R. Palomo
{"title":"游离性健忘症超越记忆功能的证据","authors":"A. L. Manzanero, R. Palomo","doi":"10.5093/apj2019a14","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The reality of dissociative amnesia has been debated at length. From a clinical perspective, there is support for the existence \nof this phenomenon, with attempts to extrapolate it to legal contexts. However, there is little evidence to confirm it and, \nmoreover, dissociative amnesias or repressed memories would go against evidences about the functioning of memory. \nThe confusion between clinical psychology and forensic psychology, an inadequate definition of amnesia, the lack of \na complete knowledge regarding the mechanisms of memory, and the problems inherent to the research of traumatic \nmemories could explain the lack of agreement.","PeriodicalId":44109,"journal":{"name":"Anuario De Psicologia Juridica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dissociative Amnesia beyond the Evidence about the Functioning of Memory\",\"authors\":\"A. L. Manzanero, R. Palomo\",\"doi\":\"10.5093/apj2019a14\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The reality of dissociative amnesia has been debated at length. From a clinical perspective, there is support for the existence \\nof this phenomenon, with attempts to extrapolate it to legal contexts. However, there is little evidence to confirm it and, \\nmoreover, dissociative amnesias or repressed memories would go against evidences about the functioning of memory. \\nThe confusion between clinical psychology and forensic psychology, an inadequate definition of amnesia, the lack of \\na complete knowledge regarding the mechanisms of memory, and the problems inherent to the research of traumatic \\nmemories could explain the lack of agreement.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44109,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Anuario De Psicologia Juridica\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Anuario De Psicologia Juridica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5093/apj2019a14\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anuario De Psicologia Juridica","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5093/apj2019a14","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

解离性健忘症的真实性一直备受争议。从临床角度来看,有证据支持这种现象的存在,并试图将其推断到法律环境中。然而,几乎没有证据可以证实这一点,而且,分离性健忘症或被压抑的记忆将与记忆功能的证据相违背。临床心理学和法医心理学之间的混淆,对健忘症的定义不充分,对记忆机制缺乏完整的认识,以及创伤性记忆研究固有的问题,可以解释缺乏共识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Dissociative Amnesia beyond the Evidence about the Functioning of Memory
The reality of dissociative amnesia has been debated at length. From a clinical perspective, there is support for the existence of this phenomenon, with attempts to extrapolate it to legal contexts. However, there is little evidence to confirm it and, moreover, dissociative amnesias or repressed memories would go against evidences about the functioning of memory. The confusion between clinical psychology and forensic psychology, an inadequate definition of amnesia, the lack of a complete knowledge regarding the mechanisms of memory, and the problems inherent to the research of traumatic memories could explain the lack of agreement.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
11.10%
发文量
3
审稿时长
18 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信