质疑1623年的恩典法令：区分正统派和异教徒的内部

IF 0.4 4区历史学 Q1 HISTORY

Culture & History Digital Journal Pub Date : 2017-11-29 DOI:10.3989/CHDJ.2017.015

J. Fowler

{"title":"质疑1623年的恩典法令：区分正统派和异教徒的内部","authors":"J. Fowler","doi":"10.3989/CHDJ.2017.015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The 1623 Edict of Grace released by the Spanish Inquisition in Seville to address the heresy of alumbradismo was a contested affair. Among the voices raised against this condemnation and equation of interior religious practice as heretical alumbradismo was that of Juan Dionisio Fernandez Portocarrero. This essay examines how the heresy of alumbradismo came to delineate the bounds of orthodox interiority and demonstrate how this boundary remained contested even a century after the construction of the heresy as an inquisitorial category.","PeriodicalId":51942,"journal":{"name":"Culture & History Digital Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2017-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Questioning the 1623 Edict of Grace: Differentiating Between Orthodox and Heterodox Interiority\",\"authors\":\"J. Fowler\",\"doi\":\"10.3989/CHDJ.2017.015\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The 1623 Edict of Grace released by the Spanish Inquisition in Seville to address the heresy of alumbradismo was a contested affair. Among the voices raised against this condemnation and equation of interior religious practice as heretical alumbradismo was that of Juan Dionisio Fernandez Portocarrero. This essay examines how the heresy of alumbradismo came to delineate the bounds of orthodox interiority and demonstrate how this boundary remained contested even a century after the construction of the heresy as an inquisitorial category.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51942,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Culture & History Digital Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-11-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Culture & History Digital Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3989/CHDJ.2017.015\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Culture & History Digital Journal","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3989/CHDJ.2017.015","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 2

摘要

1623年，塞维利亚的西班牙宗教裁判所发布了《恩典诏书》，以解决校友异端问题，这是一件有争议的事情。胡安·迪奥尼西奥·费尔南德斯·波托卡雷罗（Juan Dionisio Fernandez Portocarrero）是反对这种谴责和将内部宗教实践等同为异端校友的声音之一。本文考察了校友会的异端是如何划定正统内部性的界限的，并证明了在异端作为一个审问类别被构建一个世纪后，这一界限是如何仍然存在争议的。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Questioning the 1623 Edict of Grace: Differentiating Between Orthodox and Heterodox Interiority

The 1623 Edict of Grace released by the Spanish Inquisition in Seville to address the heresy of alumbradismo was a contested affair. Among the voices raised against this condemnation and equation of interior religious practice as heretical alumbradismo was that of Juan Dionisio Fernandez Portocarrero. This essay examines how the heresy of alumbradismo came to delineate the bounds of orthodox interiority and demonstrate how this boundary remained contested even a century after the construction of the heresy as an inquisitorial category.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Culture & History Digital Journal Multiple-

CiteScore

0.60

自引率

0.00%

发文量

审稿时长

48 weeks

期刊介绍： Culture & History Digital Journal features original scientific articles and review articles, aimed to contribute to the methodological debate among historians and other scholars specialized in the fields of Human and Social Sciences, at an international level. Using an interdisciplinary and transversal approach, this Journal poses a renovation of the studies on the past, relating them and dialoguing with the present, breaking the traditional forms of thinking based on chronology, diachronic analysis, and the classical facts and forms of thinking based exclusively on textual and documental analysis. By doing so, this Journal aims to promote not only new subjects of History, but also new forms of addressing its knowledge.