中国的服务贸易优惠待遇:沉睡的巨龙即将醒来吗?

IF 1.1 4区 社会学 Q3 ECONOMICS
G. Gari
{"title":"中国的服务贸易优惠待遇:沉睡的巨龙即将醒来吗?","authors":"G. Gari","doi":"10.54648/trad2020038","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article examines China’s specific commitments and rules on trade in services included in its Preferential Trade Agreements. The findings reveal that so far such agreements include only modest improvements compared with General Agreement on Trade in Services (GATS). At the same time, the article argues that structural changes in China’s economy and a conducive policy environment are likely to stretch China’s preferential treatment on trade in services in years to come. However, the article warns that the dragon will remain particularly cautious to undertake new commitments that could limit its policy space to maintain its socialist market economy system, including disciplines on state owned enterprises, subsidies, competition and monopolies and exclusive service suppliers, data flows and regulatory coherence.","PeriodicalId":46019,"journal":{"name":"Journal of World Trade","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"China’s Preferential Treatment on Trade in Services: Is the Sleeping Dragon About to Wake Up?\",\"authors\":\"G. Gari\",\"doi\":\"10.54648/trad2020038\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article examines China’s specific commitments and rules on trade in services included in its Preferential Trade Agreements. The findings reveal that so far such agreements include only modest improvements compared with General Agreement on Trade in Services (GATS). At the same time, the article argues that structural changes in China’s economy and a conducive policy environment are likely to stretch China’s preferential treatment on trade in services in years to come. However, the article warns that the dragon will remain particularly cautious to undertake new commitments that could limit its policy space to maintain its socialist market economy system, including disciplines on state owned enterprises, subsidies, competition and monopolies and exclusive service suppliers, data flows and regulatory coherence.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46019,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of World Trade\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of World Trade\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.54648/trad2020038\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of World Trade","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54648/trad2020038","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

本文考察了中国在优惠贸易协定中关于服务贸易的具体承诺和规则。调查结果显示,到目前为止,与服务贸易总协定(GATS)相比,这类协定的改善幅度不大。与此同时,文章认为,中国经济的结构性变化和有利的政策环境可能会在未来几年延长中国在服务贸易方面的优惠待遇。然而,文章警告称,中国在做出可能限制其维持社会主义市场经济体制的政策空间的新承诺时将格外谨慎,包括对国有企业、补贴、竞争、垄断和排他性服务供应商、数据流动和监管一致性的约束。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
China’s Preferential Treatment on Trade in Services: Is the Sleeping Dragon About to Wake Up?
This article examines China’s specific commitments and rules on trade in services included in its Preferential Trade Agreements. The findings reveal that so far such agreements include only modest improvements compared with General Agreement on Trade in Services (GATS). At the same time, the article argues that structural changes in China’s economy and a conducive policy environment are likely to stretch China’s preferential treatment on trade in services in years to come. However, the article warns that the dragon will remain particularly cautious to undertake new commitments that could limit its policy space to maintain its socialist market economy system, including disciplines on state owned enterprises, subsidies, competition and monopolies and exclusive service suppliers, data flows and regulatory coherence.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
12.50%
发文量
35
期刊介绍: Far and away the most thought-provoking and informative journal in its field, the Journal of World Trade sets the agenda for both scholarship and policy initiatives in this most critical area of international relations. It is the only journal which deals authoritatively with the most crucial issues affecting world trade today.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信