“开辟未知的道路”——对理查德·哈克吕特《霍尔大师之旅》和16世纪初英国大西洋企业发展的再评价

IF 0.6 2区 历史学 Q1 HISTORY
Joshua Ivinson
{"title":"“开辟未知的道路”——对理查德·哈克吕特《霍尔大师之旅》和16世纪初英国大西洋企业发展的再评价","authors":"Joshua Ivinson","doi":"10.1093/HISRES/HTAA031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This article overturns a century of scholarship concerning Master Hore’s infamous voyage to North America in 1536. Richard Hakluyt’s sensational account of this expedition provided the earliest narrative of an English experience of the New World, which has long been deemed to be corroborated by several High Court of Admiralty documents. However, it is demonstrated here that these sources do not corroborate each other, and that Hakluyt’s account is highly unreliable. More significantly, the existence of two previously unidentified commercial fishing ventures are discovered and analysed, thereby shedding new light on the pioneering mercantile forays of Englishmen across the Atlantic.","PeriodicalId":13059,"journal":{"name":"Historical Research","volume":"94 1","pages":"1-27"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1093/HISRES/HTAA031","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"’To cleere the course scarse knowne’: a re-evaluation of Richard Hakluyt’s ‘Voyage of Master Hore’ and the development of English Atlantic enterprise in the early sixteenth century\",\"authors\":\"Joshua Ivinson\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/HISRES/HTAA031\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n This article overturns a century of scholarship concerning Master Hore’s infamous voyage to North America in 1536. Richard Hakluyt’s sensational account of this expedition provided the earliest narrative of an English experience of the New World, which has long been deemed to be corroborated by several High Court of Admiralty documents. However, it is demonstrated here that these sources do not corroborate each other, and that Hakluyt’s account is highly unreliable. More significantly, the existence of two previously unidentified commercial fishing ventures are discovered and analysed, thereby shedding new light on the pioneering mercantile forays of Englishmen across the Atlantic.\",\"PeriodicalId\":13059,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Historical Research\",\"volume\":\"94 1\",\"pages\":\"1-27\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-03-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1093/HISRES/HTAA031\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Historical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1090\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/HISRES/HTAA031\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Historical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1090","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/HISRES/HTAA031","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

这篇文章推翻了一个世纪以来关于霍尔大师1536年臭名昭著的北美航行的学术研究。理查德·哈克卢伊特对这次探险的耸人听闻的描述提供了英国人对新大陆经历的最早叙述,长期以来一直被认为是由海军部高级法院的几份文件所证实的。然而,这里证明,这些来源不能相互证实,Hakluyt的叙述是非常不可靠的。更重要的是,人们发现并分析了两家此前未被确认的商业捕鱼企业,从而对英国人跨越大西洋的商业探险有了新的认识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
’To cleere the course scarse knowne’: a re-evaluation of Richard Hakluyt’s ‘Voyage of Master Hore’ and the development of English Atlantic enterprise in the early sixteenth century
This article overturns a century of scholarship concerning Master Hore’s infamous voyage to North America in 1536. Richard Hakluyt’s sensational account of this expedition provided the earliest narrative of an English experience of the New World, which has long been deemed to be corroborated by several High Court of Admiralty documents. However, it is demonstrated here that these sources do not corroborate each other, and that Hakluyt’s account is highly unreliable. More significantly, the existence of two previously unidentified commercial fishing ventures are discovered and analysed, thereby shedding new light on the pioneering mercantile forays of Englishmen across the Atlantic.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Since 1923, Historical Research has been a leading mainstream British historical journal. Its articles cover a wide geographical and temporal span: from the early middle ages to the twentieth century. It encourages the submission of articles from a broad variety of approaches, including social, political, urban, intellectual and cultural history.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信