组织二元性：Scopus数据库文献计量分析的全球研究现状

Q3 Engineering

西安建筑科技大学学报(自然科学版) Pub Date : 2020-05-22 DOI:10.37896/jxat12.05/1552

Asad Amjad

{"title":"组织二元性：Scopus数据库文献计量分析的全球研究现状","authors":"Asad Amjad","doi":"10.37896/jxat12.05/1552","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This bibliometric analysis evaluates the global research conducted on organizational ambidexterity using the Scopus database as a source. The purpose of this paper is to further develop a complete understanding of organizational ambidexterity comprehension. This research is based on 393 studies published in Scopus journals between 1996-2019. This examination highlights that the organizational ambidexterity papers underwent an uphill drive since 2012 onwards, having more papers annually within 2015-2019. This study is based on bibliometric analysis based on the VOS viewer software, used to conduct various analysis such as the coauthorship and cooccurrence map analysis.Exploration and exploitation emerge as the two principal dimensions used frequently with organizational ambidexterity studies globally. Besides, small and medium-sized enterprises are the least studied among organizational ambidexterity studies.","PeriodicalId":35514,"journal":{"name":"西安建筑科技大学学报(自然科学版)","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Organizational Ambidexterity: The State of Global Research Using Bibliometric Analysis on Scopus Database\",\"authors\":\"Asad Amjad\",\"doi\":\"10.37896/jxat12.05/1552\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This bibliometric analysis evaluates the global research conducted on organizational ambidexterity using the Scopus database as a source. The purpose of this paper is to further develop a complete understanding of organizational ambidexterity comprehension. This research is based on 393 studies published in Scopus journals between 1996-2019. This examination highlights that the organizational ambidexterity papers underwent an uphill drive since 2012 onwards, having more papers annually within 2015-2019. This study is based on bibliometric analysis based on the VOS viewer software, used to conduct various analysis such as the coauthorship and cooccurrence map analysis.Exploration and exploitation emerge as the two principal dimensions used frequently with organizational ambidexterity studies globally. Besides, small and medium-sized enterprises are the least studied among organizational ambidexterity studies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":35514,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"西安建筑科技大学学报(自然科学版)\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-05-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"西安建筑科技大学学报(自然科学版)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1087\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.37896/jxat12.05/1552\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Engineering\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"西安建筑科技大学学报(自然科学版)","FirstCategoryId":"1087","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37896/jxat12.05/1552","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 3

摘要

本文献计量分析以Scopus数据库为来源，评估了全球对组织二元性的研究。本文的目的是进一步发展对组织二元性理解的完整理解。这项研究基于1996-2019年间发表在Scopus期刊上的393项研究。这项检查强调，自2012年以来，组织双元性论文经历了一段艰难的发展，2015-2019年每年都有更多的论文。本研究基于基于VOS查看器软件的文献计量分析，用于进行各种分析，如合著和共现地图分析。探索和开发是全球组织双元性研究中经常使用的两个主要维度。此外，在组织双元性研究中，中小企业的研究最少。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Organizational Ambidexterity: The State of Global Research Using Bibliometric Analysis on Scopus Database

This bibliometric analysis evaluates the global research conducted on organizational ambidexterity using the Scopus database as a source. The purpose of this paper is to further develop a complete understanding of organizational ambidexterity comprehension. This research is based on 393 studies published in Scopus journals between 1996-2019. This examination highlights that the organizational ambidexterity papers underwent an uphill drive since 2012 onwards, having more papers annually within 2015-2019. This study is based on bibliometric analysis based on the VOS viewer software, used to conduct various analysis such as the coauthorship and cooccurrence map analysis.Exploration and exploitation emerge as the two principal dimensions used frequently with organizational ambidexterity studies globally. Besides, small and medium-sized enterprises are the least studied among organizational ambidexterity studies.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

西安建筑科技大学学报(自然科学版) Engineering-Architecture

CiteScore

0.70

自引率

0.00%

发文量

4841

期刊介绍： Journal of Xi'an University of Architecture and Technology (Natural Science Edition) is referred to as the Natural Science Edition. It is publicly distributed at home and abroad, bimonthly, ISSN1006-7930, CN61-1295/TU. Founded in February 1957, it is a comprehensive academic journal focusing on academic papers on basic research and applied research in related disciplines such as architecture and civil engineering. The Natural Science Edition is one of the top 100 scientific and technological journals of Chinese universities and a high-quality journal of Shaanxi universities. It is a Chinese core journal (Peking University core), a Chinese science and technology core journal, a T2 journal in the classification catalog of high-quality scientific and technological journals in the field of architectural science, and an authoritative academic journal in China by the China Center for Science Evaluation (RCCSE).