为治疗目的而非自愿住院治疗;照顾他人的行为?精神分裂症患者的观点和经验

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q4 PSYCHIATRY
Sara Kærn Linstow, A. Urfer-Parnas
{"title":"为治疗目的而非自愿住院治疗;照顾他人的行为?精神分裂症患者的观点和经验","authors":"Sara Kærn Linstow, A. Urfer-Parnas","doi":"10.1080/17522439.2023.2191132","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Background Coercive methods in psychiatry are still a matter of debate, raising ethical challenges ranging from liberal to paternalistic approaches. Involuntary hospitalisation (IH) for treatment purpose is a major intervention not yet fully examined from patients’ perspectives. Aim To examine at discharge the views and experiences of patients diagnosed with schizophrenia involuntarily hospitalized in a psychotic state for treatment purpose. Method We examined nine patients with semi-structured interview concerning their views on IH in general, their own admission, and ways to prevent such situations. Results None of the patients considered their IH necessary in its entirety or viewed their condition as psychosis. They did not consider IH as an act of care and believed that community support could have prevented IH in their case. They stressed that psychiatric patients should be able to refuse treatment as somatic patients are. Discussion We discuss the patients’ experiences and negative view of IH, the concepts of psychosis and insight, possibilities of acute outpatient intervention and ethical issues.","PeriodicalId":46344,"journal":{"name":"Psychosis-Psychological Social and Integrative Approaches","volume":"15 1","pages":"123 - 133"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Involuntary hospitalization for treatment purpose; an act of caregiving? Perspectives and experiences of patients diagnosed with schizophrenia\",\"authors\":\"Sara Kærn Linstow, A. Urfer-Parnas\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17522439.2023.2191132\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Background Coercive methods in psychiatry are still a matter of debate, raising ethical challenges ranging from liberal to paternalistic approaches. Involuntary hospitalisation (IH) for treatment purpose is a major intervention not yet fully examined from patients’ perspectives. Aim To examine at discharge the views and experiences of patients diagnosed with schizophrenia involuntarily hospitalized in a psychotic state for treatment purpose. Method We examined nine patients with semi-structured interview concerning their views on IH in general, their own admission, and ways to prevent such situations. Results None of the patients considered their IH necessary in its entirety or viewed their condition as psychosis. They did not consider IH as an act of care and believed that community support could have prevented IH in their case. They stressed that psychiatric patients should be able to refuse treatment as somatic patients are. Discussion We discuss the patients’ experiences and negative view of IH, the concepts of psychosis and insight, possibilities of acute outpatient intervention and ethical issues.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46344,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychosis-Psychological Social and Integrative Approaches\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"123 - 133\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychosis-Psychological Social and Integrative Approaches\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17522439.2023.2191132\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychosis-Psychological Social and Integrative Approaches","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17522439.2023.2191132","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

精神病学中的强制方法仍然是一个有争议的问题,它提出了从自由主义到家长式方法的伦理挑战。以治疗为目的的非自愿住院(IH)是一项主要干预措施,但尚未从患者的角度进行充分审查。目的探讨精神分裂症非自愿精神状态住院患者出院时的看法和治疗体会。方法对9例患者进行半结构化访谈,了解他们对IH的一般看法、自己的入院情况以及预防这种情况的方法。结果没有患者认为他们的IH是完全必要的,也没有患者认为他们的病情是精神病。他们不认为艾滋病毒感染是一种护理行为,并认为社区支持本可以在他们的病例中预防艾滋病毒感染。他们强调说,精神病人应该能够像身体病人一样拒绝治疗。我们讨论了患者的经历和对IH的负面看法,精神病和洞察力的概念,急性门诊干预的可能性和伦理问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Involuntary hospitalization for treatment purpose; an act of caregiving? Perspectives and experiences of patients diagnosed with schizophrenia
ABSTRACT Background Coercive methods in psychiatry are still a matter of debate, raising ethical challenges ranging from liberal to paternalistic approaches. Involuntary hospitalisation (IH) for treatment purpose is a major intervention not yet fully examined from patients’ perspectives. Aim To examine at discharge the views and experiences of patients diagnosed with schizophrenia involuntarily hospitalized in a psychotic state for treatment purpose. Method We examined nine patients with semi-structured interview concerning their views on IH in general, their own admission, and ways to prevent such situations. Results None of the patients considered their IH necessary in its entirety or viewed their condition as psychosis. They did not consider IH as an act of care and believed that community support could have prevented IH in their case. They stressed that psychiatric patients should be able to refuse treatment as somatic patients are. Discussion We discuss the patients’ experiences and negative view of IH, the concepts of psychosis and insight, possibilities of acute outpatient intervention and ethical issues.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
8.30%
发文量
36
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信