基于模糊mcdm的可再生能源技术优先排序方法

Q2 Social Sciences
M. Ebrahimi
{"title":"基于模糊mcdm的可再生能源技术优先排序方法","authors":"M. Ebrahimi","doi":"10.1504/IJETP.2018.10016625","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The main objective of this study is to build a decision model adapted to prioritise renewable energy technologies by applying fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) methods. A comprehensive set of criteria is presented based on sustainability due to its importance in the long-term, particularly in the field of energy which is a key element of sustainable development. They are classified into five categories such as technical, economic, environmental, social, and political criteria. This model is then operationalised in the scope of solar energy technologies in Iran. This paper examines and compares the results of fuzzy TOPSIS and fuzzy PROMETHEE based on a single decision maker. The results show that rather than the two technologies, others in both methods have moderate differences in ranking. However, technological decisions are preferred to be made based on FTOPSIS results because it is considered to be more realistic.","PeriodicalId":35754,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Energy Technology and Policy","volume":"14 1","pages":"369-389"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A fuzzy MCDM-based approach for renewable energy technologies prioritisation\",\"authors\":\"M. Ebrahimi\",\"doi\":\"10.1504/IJETP.2018.10016625\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The main objective of this study is to build a decision model adapted to prioritise renewable energy technologies by applying fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) methods. A comprehensive set of criteria is presented based on sustainability due to its importance in the long-term, particularly in the field of energy which is a key element of sustainable development. They are classified into five categories such as technical, economic, environmental, social, and political criteria. This model is then operationalised in the scope of solar energy technologies in Iran. This paper examines and compares the results of fuzzy TOPSIS and fuzzy PROMETHEE based on a single decision maker. The results show that rather than the two technologies, others in both methods have moderate differences in ranking. However, technological decisions are preferred to be made based on FTOPSIS results because it is considered to be more realistic.\",\"PeriodicalId\":35754,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Energy Technology and Policy\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"369-389\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-10-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Energy Technology and Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1504/IJETP.2018.10016625\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Energy Technology and Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1504/IJETP.2018.10016625","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的主要目的是运用模糊多准则决策(MCDM)方法,建立适合可再生能源技术优先级的决策模型。鉴于可持续性在长期的重要性,特别是在作为可持续发展关键因素的能源领域,提出了一套全面的标准。它们被分为技术、经济、环境、社会和政治等五类标准。然后,该模型在伊朗的太阳能技术范围内进行操作。本文对基于单一决策者的模糊TOPSIS和模糊PROMETHEE的结果进行了检验和比较。结果表明,除了这两种技术,两种方法中的其他技术在排名上存在适度差异。然而,技术决策更倾向于基于FTOPSIS结果,因为它被认为更现实。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A fuzzy MCDM-based approach for renewable energy technologies prioritisation
The main objective of this study is to build a decision model adapted to prioritise renewable energy technologies by applying fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) methods. A comprehensive set of criteria is presented based on sustainability due to its importance in the long-term, particularly in the field of energy which is a key element of sustainable development. They are classified into five categories such as technical, economic, environmental, social, and political criteria. This model is then operationalised in the scope of solar energy technologies in Iran. This paper examines and compares the results of fuzzy TOPSIS and fuzzy PROMETHEE based on a single decision maker. The results show that rather than the two technologies, others in both methods have moderate differences in ranking. However, technological decisions are preferred to be made based on FTOPSIS results because it is considered to be more realistic.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Energy Technology and Policy
International Journal of Energy Technology and Policy Social Sciences-Geography, Planning and Development
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
期刊介绍: The IJETP is a vehicle to provide a refereed and authoritative source of information in the field of energy technology and policy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信